You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

180 Proof

Comments

Nazis were genocidal oppressors and Jews et al were the oppressed and mostly slaughtered by Nazis. I'm consistent, BC – no matter how bestial the oppr...
October 27, 2023 at 23:59
Krauts!
October 27, 2023 at 23:48
Hypotheses (your tv example) are propositional; however, conceptual suppositions, or interpretations, are not propositional, Bob, insofar as matters o...
October 27, 2023 at 23:26
Of course not. The oppressor (group B) is more morally reprehensible than the oppressed (group A).
October 27, 2023 at 22:55
So ... acting without fear (i.e. "fearless") and acting despite fear (i.e. "brave") seems to correspond to self-deception and lucidity, respectively.
October 27, 2023 at 22:49
:up: :up:
October 27, 2023 at 04:42
Our descendants' lab-grown steaks sausages & chicken tenders will be too convenient and taste too good to fret about obsolete barbaric practices.
October 26, 2023 at 23:47
No. IMO, none will not care – even remember – once industrial meat has been completely replaced by lab-grown meat.
October 26, 2023 at 10:11
I was raised Catholic and educated for twelve years by Franciscans & Jesuits; most, if not all, of the "doctrines" I had "internalized" stopped making...
October 26, 2023 at 10:09
:up:
October 26, 2023 at 04:16
Your learned incorrigibility embarrasses you again, Wayfarer. Carry on ...
October 26, 2023 at 04:14
:up: More or less my own objection to the "p-zombie" construct.
October 26, 2023 at 04:09
As @"Janus" was first to point out, sir, you clearly do not understand what Spinoza says quite clearly in his Ethics. :kiss:
October 26, 2023 at 04:00
Such as – ? The prospective rewards seem to me more than worth the un/foreseeable risks.
October 26, 2023 at 03:46
I'm afraid, sir, nothing you've said here demonstrates you've read anything more than an online high schooler's notes lifted from Spinoza for Dummies....
October 26, 2023 at 03:43
There are also "books which explore the links between" and . Take Janus's recommendation, Wayf, and actually (re)read Spinoza on his own anti-transcen...
October 26, 2023 at 03:35
I consider Spinoza an ecstatic rationalist. :fire: And this means what? Not 'seeking union with a transcendent being/reality' (because Spinoza, in eff...
October 25, 2023 at 23:17
Spinoza says philosophy seeks understanding and that our freedom expands as our understanding deepens. Probably because the very young Spinoza wouldn'...
October 25, 2023 at 23:01
:100:
October 25, 2023 at 22:35
Again, you've lost me, Jack. Tell me what you may find problematic about the answers I gave to your question.
October 25, 2023 at 22:30
With respect to (subpersonal) "life" in general, except conatus (i.e. "to persist in being" ~Spinoza), there is not any "purpose". As for "human life"...
October 25, 2023 at 21:14
And your philosophical question / aporia is – ?
October 25, 2023 at 20:54
:up:
October 25, 2023 at 20:48
Simplistic, I know – Iran has used Hamas to open the slaughterhouse-trap door and Israel is raging through it like a bull bristling with US/NATO arms ...
October 25, 2023 at 20:43
:flower:
October 25, 2023 at 20:13
@"Jack Cummins" it's also not clear to me (Epicurean-Spinozist by day & absurdist bluesman by night ... mostly) what you're asking in the OP.
October 25, 2023 at 20:08
:up:
October 25, 2023 at 10:43
I know the notion is quite ancient but Nietzsche conceives of 're-experiencing – consciously re-living – one's exact same life eternally' as a psychol...
October 25, 2023 at 09:05
:100:
October 25, 2023 at 04:39
Demonstrating ...
October 25, 2023 at 04:37
Given the complexity of the human brain, comprehending it theoretically and thereby eliminating dysfunctions produced by the brain's organic defects p...
October 25, 2023 at 04:13
None of that amounts to a cultural "taboo" as the growing pervasiveness of various Western "New Age" subcultures since the 1950s shows. "Reincarnation...
October 25, 2023 at 03:26
Why do you believe it's "taboo"?
October 25, 2023 at 01:31
Maybe not. Why would we rationally want that?
October 25, 2023 at 00:44
:fire: :up:
October 25, 2023 at 00:34
:roll:
October 25, 2023 at 00:28
Apparently.
October 25, 2023 at 00:21
I am not (consciously) "anthropocentric" at all. I'm also not "misanthropic" at all. You're special pleading conflates difference of degree with (an u...
October 25, 2023 at 00:14
:clap: :cool:
October 24, 2023 at 21:46
Jenna Ellis, domino number 4 out 18 (3rd MAGA lawyer in five days) drops – https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2023/oct/24/jenna-ellis-plea-deal-trump...
October 24, 2023 at 21:27
FWIW, I found your meaning perfectly clear. :up: Reread the preceding two-thirds of the sentence in question in order to grok the last third. We "crea...
October 24, 2023 at 11:16
It was just fine without human beings during the 13.8 billion years prior to a quarter million years ago so I suspect – consistent with the mediocrity...
October 24, 2023 at 10:10
Maybe the following clarifies the point I tried to make here ... Your proposed "optimistic technopaganism", Bret, seems suitable for maximizing (A) & ...
October 24, 2023 at 05:58
So some impersonal entity, not me (i.e. not mine-ness), "gets reincarnated"? If that's the case, then I need not care about "the soul" and live as I l...
October 23, 2023 at 22:02
How collectivist of you ... :mask:
October 23, 2023 at 21:50
Some (@"Wayfarer") might say you're already on the "enlightened" path ...
October 23, 2023 at 21:44
Given that sound arguments cannot be raised on the following basis, does it ever make sense to 'speculatively interpret' (i.e. philosophically, or cat...
October 23, 2023 at 21:41
It seems horror (i.e. cruelty-betrayal, oppression, dispossession, murder) breeds terror (i.e. anxiety-trauma, vengence, resistance, despair). In many...
October 23, 2023 at 21:06
:fire:
October 23, 2023 at 20:51