You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

180 Proof

Comments

:100: I think, just before Witty, Nietzsche & Peirce (among others) in their own ways also elevate "social practices" and deflate "pure reason" as wel...
February 21, 2024 at 18:55
Chomsky's breezy rundown in the video of the war crimes / atrocities of postwar US Presidents, who, in fact, were (are) presiding over the American Im...
February 21, 2024 at 18:36
FOX spews lies to an audience who wants be lied to, many of whom don't vote, so those "headlines" are as irrelevant as the Ranking of Presidents is ir...
February 21, 2024 at 17:48
So what?
February 20, 2024 at 21:33
:up:
February 20, 2024 at 21:31
This very much reminds of my mother's idiosyncratic non-doctrinnaire, or ceremonial, Catholicism: quiet prayer-focused and weekly charity work usually...
February 20, 2024 at 18:49
... you vapidly conflate with Kant's use of transcendental (which you further confuse with "Transcendentalism"). Apparently, it never occurs to you, G...
February 20, 2024 at 18:25
Only some (idealist) philosophers ... most of whom argue from rather than towards their conclusion. Anyway, at least since Democritus in the 5th centu...
February 20, 2024 at 17:44
From a 2020 thread Ranking American Presidents... 154 varied and distinguished scholars agree: Loser-1 is still ranked at the bottom of the list of 46...
February 20, 2024 at 16:47
https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/882497
February 20, 2024 at 16:46
February 20, 2024 at 16:34
:cool: yw.
February 20, 2024 at 01:18
Well I disagree with this antirealist suggestion, Pez – "concepts" do not "change" themselves, we change our concepts in order to adapt. Turning on ho...
February 19, 2024 at 18:29
"Beliefs" such as? Also, please clarify what you mean by "embracing them fully".
February 18, 2024 at 21:44
:smirk: :up: :up:
February 18, 2024 at 21:33
As I understand it, philosophy concerns making explicit – problematizing – the "limitations of the mundane" beginning with reasoning itself (e.g. Plat...
February 18, 2024 at 21:20
Spinoza is my (modern) 'metaphysical' touchstone ... then Freddy & Witty, Zapffe-Camus, C. Rosset ... and more recently Meillassoux-Brassier. Not the ...
February 18, 2024 at 20:11
:smirk: Yep, it's only February ... and so it goes.
February 18, 2024 at 09:40
I've witnessed this sort of "divorce" afflicting several friends and acquaintances throughout my life and always have felt fortunate that I didn't go ...
February 18, 2024 at 09:34
:chin: It seems to me that the terms 'worldview' and metaphysics' are too often used interchangeably and this is confusing. I think, by reflective rea...
February 18, 2024 at 07:54
:ok:
February 18, 2024 at 05:01
Why interpret such an incredible ("I can't believe what I'm seeing") encounter as "God" or in some religious way?
February 17, 2024 at 23:17
@"Jack Cummins" ( @"Pantagruel" ) A. Tell me – a freethinker – what of significance I am missing or fail to understand by dismissing so-called "esoter...
February 17, 2024 at 23:12
Thanks, but I've read the official J6 Report by the US House Special Cmte as well as paid close attention to the MAGA movement since 2015 as well as t...
February 17, 2024 at 21:42
So ... 'believing is seeing', is that it? or "Seek and ye shall find?" Seems to me an instance of the placebo-effect of confirmation bias. No doubt, w...
February 17, 2024 at 21:28
"Counting" may start at 1. Numbers, however, do not "start" (i.e. begin / end).
February 17, 2024 at 20:10
:fire: :100:
February 17, 2024 at 19:26
Of course they do – their audience is a loser cult that lives to be lied to – which is good for business. Fox Noise, OAN, NewsMax, Alex Jones, RT, etc...
February 17, 2024 at 19:06
I don't "make" anything of it; I'm not a logician.
February 17, 2024 at 13:50
:up:
February 17, 2024 at 13:14
I don't understand what you're saying here. Please reformulate and clarify. More simply put, my position is : nature does not "comply" with "physical ...
February 17, 2024 at 11:17
Loser-1's KARMA WATCH: 16Feb24 criminal trials (pending): • GA 2020 Election Interference RICO Indictment, 13 felonies – TBD in Atlanta • NY 2016 "Hus...
February 17, 2024 at 09:01
I suppose my own "axis mundi" consists of the 'principle of non-contradiction (PNC) sans principle of sufficient reason (~PSR) —> universal contingenc...
February 17, 2024 at 03:21
As always, sir, your Dunning-Kruger, woo-of-the-gaps, quasi-scientism is :rofl: :lol: :razz:
February 17, 2024 at 00:37
16Feb24 Apparently, an Appellate-proof (restrained) judgment of over $450 million (disgorgement + interest), barred for (only) 3 years from doing busi...
February 17, 2024 at 00:29
There seems to be far far more compelling, objective evidence that, for example, dinosaurs had existed +65 million years ago than there is that an iti...
February 16, 2024 at 16:16
:100: :up:
February 16, 2024 at 15:42
Welcome to TPF ... In sum, I understand modern natural sciences in this way – from an old post (2021): In other words, "physical laws" are invariants ...
February 16, 2024 at 15:34
:up:
February 16, 2024 at 04:28
On the contrary, mate, it's quite easy to know the impacts of emotion on thinking from lived experience (e.g. frustration, romance, intoxication, stre...
February 16, 2024 at 01:04
I'm irreligious ...
February 16, 2024 at 00:48
:up:
February 16, 2024 at 00:27
AFAIK, no one, including any p0m0, has ever pointed out a 'culture' wherein mathematics does not work (e.g. "0 > 1" ... "2 + 2 = 87" ... "C = 3 ? r" ....
February 16, 2024 at 00:23
This is not a physics forum so I don't see the philosophical relevance of the quote cited; and conflating the Schrödinger equation with the 'Schröding...
February 15, 2024 at 19:33
:sparkle: :eyes: :lol:
February 15, 2024 at 18:56
:roll:
February 15, 2024 at 17:30
I tend to agree with Spinoza (& e.g. the Epicureans, Stoics, Pyrrhonians), strong emotions tend to bias or block thinking, especially philosophizing, ...
February 15, 2024 at 17:26
I heve no idea what you mean, ucarr. Deacon sounds like he's espousing what C. Rovelli aptly calls "quantum nonsense" (re: ).
February 15, 2024 at 15:27
Unless I'm mistaken, I think contradiction in (non-dialetheistic) logic = necessary falsity; in modal logic = necessary impossibility; and in modal me...
February 15, 2024 at 07:16
See p.1 of this thread for my exchanges with @"ucarr" on discussed similarities of classical atomism and "absential materialism", namely the role of a...
February 15, 2024 at 03:34