180 Proof

Idk, I've only taken "the blue pill" and suspect that "the red pill" only shows that all pills are "blue".

The opposite of "trolling".

So it's the "blue pill" for you. :cool: :smirk:

:lol: stfu & gfy.

:clap: :up: More or less this summarizes how I also read Witty's later thinking (re: recursively generated plurality of non-discrete discourses) which...

:shade: You're a fatuous liar, BitCunt! Here's some more "antisemitic propaganda" ... The Jerusalem Post 26March23 "32% of all racist incidents in 202...

It happens occasionally with the current lottery setups.

No. TPF suffices. When that's no longer the case, who knows – maybe.

In other words, @"Philosophim" wants you to pretend, along with him, that the OP's argument presented on his other thread (link to it in this OP) has ...

AFAIK, that's the "official line" only in many (not most or all) contemporary, developed nations.

I suspect that, especially duuring peak childbearing life-stages, human males are "naturally polygamous" and human females are "naturally monogamous",...

:up: A corollary to my Ligotti post above from @"Philosophim's" other "existence should be" thread... https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/commen...

Yw. :cool: Yes (and as a conceptual analogue for Democritus-Epicurus' void), though I interpret the concept as temporal only and not, like Spinoza, al...

War criminals Bibi & Hamas together at last: https://www.reuters.com/world/middle-east/reactions-icc-decision-israeli-hamas-leaders-2024-05-20/

:up:

:100: :zip:

An alternative that would be easier to implement, it seems to me (here in the US), is to generate more than 1 set of numbers for each drawing so that ...

A quasi-scientistic interpretation of the Spinozist natura naturans (substance). Interesting (despite the physics-mystical gloss) but, IMO, philosophi...

No. Except where a philosopher proposes, in the e.g. Hellenic sense, 'philosophy as a way of life' (P. Hadot), I think a philosophy ought to be judged...

:smirk::up:

Maybe because no one understands (or accepts)

"Trolling?" Nah, just rodeo clowning bulls*** :smirk:

(Sorry if my counter-argument requires more thought than you gave your argument in the OP.) Once again ... https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/c...

:clap: :rofl: So what will the GOP (gang of pigshits)-MAGA (morons and grifter asswipes) party-line be when Orange Turd-1 is found guilty in NYC (agai...

:roll: Like some others already have (which you incorrigibly don't get, Phil), been there, done that: https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/commen...

Addendum to https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/904275

I don't assume it necessarily would. For my scenario to work, AGI wouldn't have "care" about anything but philanthropically optimizing the infrastruct...

:lol:

Assuming this political-economic 'diagnosis' https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/820342 the most feasible(?) prospects for 'treating the...

:up: :up:

:roll: What about Sheol? https://www.jewishencyclopedia.com/articles/13563-sheol

:smirk: :up:

Since when has it become illogical to disbelieve illogical claims (e.g. theism)? :chin: https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/902043

:roll: Well, this is like saying 'If some observation corresponds to some Star Wars-specific proposition, then it is evidence that Jediism is true.' h...

:up: :up:

I think "empathy and compassion" may preceed, rather than follow from, philosophy (which consists of reflecting on, among many other aspects of human ...

More projection = confession :lol:

Addendum to the 2012 documentary The Gatekeepers linked in my previous post https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/900701 :scream: THE CALL...

Probably the same way/s it can (or cannot) be determined whether you or I have agency. I don't think so. Besides, if an "AI" is actually intelligent, ...

Are we human (fully/mostly) "conscious"? The jury is still out. And, other than anthropocentrically, why does it matter either way? Only if (and when)...

I did not ask for a comment and yet I thanked you for it anyway.

Thanks for making my point. :smirk:

:up: :up:

@"Constance" @"Wayfarer"

:100: :fire: Given his "fundamental question", maybe @"Constance" has not considered (e.g.) Spinoza's conatus.

:fire: :up: The next round (or three) is on me, mate.

(or) immanent to – encompassed by – the seas are its waves

. I.e. "existence is" is a sentence fragment. :roll:

Yes, but those "expressions" come well after Husserl and his immediate followers. And, more philosophically, whether or not X is undecidable (if so, t...

The question-begging (Platonic / Cartesian / transcendent) assumption in (Kantian, Husserlian) transcendental arguments is that "in there" (mind) is s...