You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

180 Proof

Comments

Why do you assume that energy (e.g. massless particles ... mental activity ...) is not material?
July 11, 2024 at 21:04
Maybe, but imo not as much as being either an Epicurean philosopher or a Stoic philosopher ... or even being an absurdist (Zapffe/Camus-like) philosop...
July 11, 2024 at 20:29
:roll: These are not the droids you are looking for.
July 11, 2024 at 20:16
:up:
July 11, 2024 at 10:36
Thanks. Like e.g. absolute ends justify/excuses all relative means (Biblical / Quranic theodicy); "teleological suspension of the ethical" (Kierkegaar...
July 11, 2024 at 09:21
:smirk: Yes, (dogmatic) rationalizing is always easier than (reflective-dialectical-defeasible) reasoning ... especially for foolosophers.
July 10, 2024 at 21:59
No, of course not. One does not entail the other. Besides, it's more adaptive (or pragmatic) than not, to have a morality (from the Latin word mores m...
July 10, 2024 at 21:58
Using a more precise and specific term – "anti-supernatural" in this case – is no more limiting (imo) than using a better, perhaps the best, tool for ...
July 10, 2024 at 21:00
No, but I understand that "The Good" is nonbeing. I know that if she's a mortal, then she cannot "know" ...
July 10, 2024 at 11:33
Non sequitur. It was you, Panta, who asserted without argument that my sine qua non claims of theism, which are easily falsified (i.e. atheism), is "a...
July 10, 2024 at 11:03
No. Again, morals =/= laws. :roll: I don't believe in "God" ... and, because there are objective truths, I'm a moral naturalist. :up:
July 10, 2024 at 08:05
Except for 2008 & 2020, I've only voted for progressive alternatives to our governing corporate duopoly ... :100: :up:
July 10, 2024 at 08:03
@"Pantagruel"
July 10, 2024 at 07:46
Morals =/= laws; your question doesn't make sense.
July 10, 2024 at 07:32
Given the context (our two posts at the top of this page), ask a question that makes sense.
July 10, 2024 at 07:25
Non sequitur & category error.
July 10, 2024 at 04:25
:halo: :up:
July 10, 2024 at 04:16
From a human perspective, non-human nature can seem "unfair and unjust" ... to some less fortuitous "human populations".
July 10, 2024 at 04:08
:up:
July 10, 2024 at 04:01
:up: :up: ... then (a) "God" is not an objective fact that is either directly or indirectly observed. As per Plato's Euthyphro, 'morality is objective...
July 10, 2024 at 01:03
:sweat:
July 09, 2024 at 17:47
:up:
July 09, 2024 at 17:22
:roll: Ad hominem, not an argument. Quite telling.
July 09, 2024 at 17:19
Addendum to To the degree you (we) are not coerced by other agents or constrained by either internal and/or external conditions, you (we) "have" free ...
July 09, 2024 at 17:17
We do not "deny" anyone's "experience" only observe that such "experience" does not correspond to anything outside of your head. The experiential diff...
July 09, 2024 at 16:27
:100: Amen!
July 09, 2024 at 07:17
"An illusion" is that which is not what it seems to be. "An array of choices" is, in fact, only some predictions based on inertia, biases, assumptions...
July 09, 2024 at 04:00
:100:
July 09, 2024 at 02:27
:up: :up:
July 09, 2024 at 02:25
Yes, as in freethought: thinking (inquiry) free of "tradition" in such a way that we are free for recreating (reasonably extending, or modernizing) tr...
July 09, 2024 at 01:55
No matter who winds up the Democrat's presidential nominee, all that matters now it seems to me is this:
July 09, 2024 at 01:39
Of course it is, just like your question.
July 09, 2024 at 01:32
Yes, but I didn't say or imply anything about "proof". I remarked on a previous nonsensical statement that 'without god, there are no objective truths...
July 08, 2024 at 23:46
I hope philosophy helps me to live less foolishly ...
July 08, 2024 at 23:40
:up: Exactly. For example, theists cannot demonstrate that their "god exists" is (except only in their minds) an objective truth.
July 08, 2024 at 23:04
:eyes:
July 08, 2024 at 23:00
8July24 Day seven of the American Monarchy (7 AM) So who would you vote for (if you could / will vote in the 2024 election): (A) the old man who (usua...
July 08, 2024 at 22:58
I agree, that's why I said nothing about it. This statement doesn't make any sense Well, that seems to me a "fairly adolescent" – unwarranted – "premi...
July 08, 2024 at 22:36
Free thinking, free living. For starters, in order to flourish more than languish... Perhaps they "seem" so to a child. No more "irrational" than an a...
July 08, 2024 at 22:17
"Mind" is not a thing; it's merely what some very rare, complex material systems do. Stuff is just stuff and very rare bits of stuff happen to be awar...
July 08, 2024 at 20:07
Conspiracy thinking ain't my thing ...
July 08, 2024 at 19:15
Based on Abrahamic, Hindi, pantheonic Greco-Roman-Egyptian-Babylonian-Persian-Mesoamerican-Aboriginal traditions, I understand theism as consisting of...
July 08, 2024 at 19:05
My guess is that, barring a debilitating health event or worse, if Biden doesn't step aside this week (or next at the latest), then he will be on the ...
July 08, 2024 at 17:36
DNC party rules and, because he is the incumbent president, Biden (team) controls the Dems convention nominating process. Besides, even if the Dems co...
July 08, 2024 at 06:48
No.
July 08, 2024 at 05:24
:up: :up:
July 07, 2024 at 22:11
If I may – go to the source and read Ethics (Edwin Curley's translation); however, if you must read secondary literature, I recommend Spinoza by Stuar...
July 07, 2024 at 05:16
Well, this "atheist" certainly is "qualified to speak about what" theism "is not" – the sine qua non claims of theism¹ are demonstrably not true. from...
July 06, 2024 at 00:03
@"Jack Cummins" https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/914581
July 05, 2024 at 21:27
A post-scarcity, demarchic social system is as "fair and just" as I can imagine.
July 05, 2024 at 21:12