:up: Incoherent gibberish. 'Transcends existence' denotes (1) separate from existence, (2) non-existence or does not exist; if 'necessarily transcends...
By all means, Prof. Apisa, provide correction - show me the syllogistic error of ways. "Do it. YOU CANNOT DO IT." :sweat: Now now you can't expect res...
p1. I have reason to suspect that whatever necessariily transcends existence is impossible to exist. p2. I have reason to suspect a god necessarily tr...
Philosophy (in the "as a way of life" sense ~Hadot) is, in my understanding and practice, much like addiction recovery - it's not the using addict but...
Fortunately, the US Constitution states clearly that a presidential (& vice-presidential) term ends after four years and so, without an election, he'l...
Explain how an ultimate "issue" makes an existential difference one way or another to proximate beings like us. I'm persuaded by Camus that such "exis...
"The only ism that has justified itself is pessimism." ~George Orwell :mask: :shade: A co-founder of the (usually) tRump-sympathizing Federalist Socie...
"Evidence?" Okay. :roll: Btw, read the post again. My 'answer' was/is neither - because "the question is invalid" (i.e. "origins" is a question for sc...
Neither. It's a pseudo-question (lacks specificity, parameters, etc for determining what would count as correct answers) for starters. And philosophy ...
Oh you're right about Frank's idiosyncratic 'definition'; but who cares? Words (concepts) belong to conventions of usage with long histories - they do...
Well if you are as intelligent as you think you are, then you will agree that 'if A = B and B = C, then A = C', right? :sweat: So: If Frank Apisa's g/...
Well, in that case, here's a hanging softball: Given, Frank, that you do not know whether or not "any gods" exist, which "gods" do you believe in (tru...
I had the same reaction as boethius as I mentioned on my first post (page 1). It's not damning - I'm aware that, in the main, moral objectivism's prov...
The best contemporary science - (neo-darwinian) Natural Selection, General Relativity & Quantum Field Theory - is the overwhelmingly preponderant body...
Apparently, "it can't be answered" By You; many many, however, have answered the g/G-question intelligently either way, some even have conclusively (i...
:up: "I can't lie to you about your chances, but... you have my sympathies." I'd say science seeks "the creator" by studying "creation" (e.g. ... Hypa...
Well, cutting to the chase, if there is (at least one) theistic g/G (i.e. "revealed supernatural agency") then ALL of our sciences are invalidated and...
No. Sisyphus is happy in the end (Camus), ennobled, perhaps, by sacrilegious - absurdist - spite. That absurd 'grace' has yet to be achieved by (my) s...
@OP - Yes. A précis on (an) 'objective (i.e. subject/pov-invariant) morality': https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/355166 So as a metaet...
We will be safe. (optimist) We will not be safe. (pessimist) We are safe - until we are not. (realist absurdist) Okay; not a fan of "optimists" (i.e. ...
Projection on this forum, Frank, is pathetic. In these many months you've not so much as scuffed one of my arguments while I've blown down your infant...
If you haven't yet, this Cioran documentary is well worth an hour or so of your dying ... https://m.youtube.com/watch?t=10s&v=78y06QkpnC8 :death: :flo...
So then your dismissal of the explanatory relevance of . likewise is nothing but "smoke and mirrors" too. Okay. Just checking. Like a broken record yo...
Comments