You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

180 Proof

Comments

Excerpt from an old post (sans 'psychologism' creeping up in this thread)
December 04, 2022 at 01:27
Okay. :up: Now your projection is showing ...
December 04, 2022 at 00:15
Whatever. You reformulate what I've written just to shadowbox with strawmen. That's masturbatory, TM.
December 03, 2022 at 22:08
As pointed out already, these promises are implications of – implicit in – human eusociality. Tell me how we are eusocial without them in the absence ...
December 03, 2022 at 21:34
No. :roll: I'm quoting you (re: OP) as the rest of the sentence suggests.
December 03, 2022 at 21:24
Do you agree with Searle's concept of promises as institutional facts in which oughts are entailed? Insofar as we humans are a eusocial species, it se...
December 03, 2022 at 20:56
Your incomprehension exceeds even your otten poor reasoning, G. Neither "multiverse" nor "many worlds" are "scientific postulations". :sweat: Again, s...
December 03, 2022 at 19:43
It's a way of begging the question, that is, continuously pushing further back, or deferring, an answer e.g. "origin of universe?" god. "origin of god...
December 03, 2022 at 17:53
In: The Will  — view comment
:up:
December 03, 2022 at 07:19
"Reconcile with atheism"? Before that, it's question-begging (or an infinite regress) – doesn't make sense logically, ontologically or scientifically....
December 03, 2022 at 05:45
IIRC, H. Frankfurt describes bullshitting as – I paraphrase – complete self-serving disregard for the true/false distinction especially in (demogogic)...
December 03, 2022 at 04:28
I ask because you think "bullshitting" is "mostly detrimental to ethics" which makes no more sense than saying 'dyscalculia is mostly detrimental to m...
December 03, 2022 at 04:11
What do you thisnk ethics is about?
December 03, 2022 at 04:06
What you wrote doesn't make sense to me so I can't "disagree" with what you've written. For instance, Frankfurt's talking about political discourse, n...
December 03, 2022 at 04:02
Negation of yes.
December 03, 2022 at 03:54
:sweat: :meh: No.
December 03, 2022 at 03:53
I don't see how positing an "a priori" "first cause" "unmoved mover" entity explains anything (let alone "everything') more than occult non-explanatio...
December 03, 2022 at 03:51
?
December 03, 2022 at 03:32
Unless one is an anti-social sociopath, thereby lacks (common) empathy, I don't think "being ethical", as you put it, is difficult. Practice, however,...
December 03, 2022 at 02:03
I don't know of any concept or principle that "exists in a vacuum."
December 03, 2022 at 01:24
I don't think integrity requires commitment to "the platonic good".
December 03, 2022 at 00:37
Well ... ... the placebo effect works. I don't see how we cannot. Should we h. sapiens give up our civilized facades, or pretenses?
December 03, 2022 at 00:29
In: The Will  — view comment
Yes. 'Volitions' (i.e. more veto than volo) are only infrequent interruptions in involuntary systems, reflexes & habits (i.e. embodiment). I suspect, ...
December 03, 2022 at 00:10
No doubt.
December 02, 2022 at 21:13
Thanks. My memory is pretty good but often I confiirm quotes, etc with Google rather than pulling books or whatever from my stacks. A lifetime of stud...
December 02, 2022 at 21:13
This post is nonsense. C'mon, try harder to address what your interlocators are actually saying. Don't waste anybody's time. Read my objections to you...
December 02, 2022 at 20:52
On film? :fire: :eyes: https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/756269
December 02, 2022 at 11:15
In: Eureka!  — view comment
I "understand" his Incompleteness theorems only while I'm reading them or a learned synopsis of them. I guess I'm "stuck" at not being an adequate eno...
December 02, 2022 at 03:39
If not an epicurean god, then I would be a god that uses 'my godly power' to do only one thing: by fiat I'd remove every anti-social pathology / aptit...
December 02, 2022 at 03:26
Apophasis (e.g. apophatic theology).
December 02, 2022 at 02:23
I have. Derived from incoherent assumptions, your "points" lack merit. Now deal with my counterpoints if you can. :eyes: More empty rhetoric.
December 02, 2022 at 02:12
For me, she's the epitome of courage. :fire:
December 02, 2022 at 02:05
How we live. How we think.
December 01, 2022 at 06:52
How do you know that you "really know" this?
December 01, 2022 at 00:05
I suppose, defeasible reasoning and modern sciences notwithstanding, just as we cannot get rid of 'magical thinking' either. :sparkle:
December 01, 2022 at 00:01
:roll: :shade: :point: https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/759498
November 30, 2022 at 23:49
:smirk: Thanks. And in the spirit of @"Amity"'s OP, a George Harrison 'song of hope' (or joy in a minor key) as interpreted by Nina Simone https://m.y...
November 30, 2022 at 18:32
In: Eureka!  — view comment
Another time, mi amigo, it's 5am here ... :yawn: Besides, I suspect @"jgill" or @"Banno" can help you out with old Gödel.
November 30, 2022 at 13:10
"If I can't dance, I don't want to be part of your revolution." ~Emma Goldman "Hope as a feeling?" Pacifer, or placebo, for fear "Hope as an action?" ...
November 30, 2022 at 12:56
In: Eureka!  — view comment
Well Gödel shook Hilbert from that fever-dream. :smirk:
November 30, 2022 at 11:36
In: Eureka!  — view comment
My shorthand: to understand is to, explicitly or implicitly, contextualize discourses (i.e. narratives, maps, models), actions or events in order to o...
November 30, 2022 at 10:33
:100:
November 30, 2022 at 09:59
:smirk:
November 30, 2022 at 09:31
I think you're way off. Schrödinger's cat thought-experiment was proposed in order to show that quantum theory (re: superposition, measurement problem...
November 30, 2022 at 09:10
Norms are useful or not useful for some purpose; they are not truth-claims in any sense. A moral statement like "torture is wrong" is, to my way of th...
November 30, 2022 at 03:27
I've always thought that "multiverse" is a wildly extrapolated misunderstanding of Hugh Everett's many worlds interpretation of the interference patte...
November 30, 2022 at 03:08
Apparently, it hasn't occurred to you, Toothless, that "moral realism" is incoherent (re: assumption that moral statements are empirical propositions)...
November 30, 2022 at 00:16
Verificationism (i.e. Logical Positivism) doesn't make such distinctions and designates as "cognitively meaningless" all statements – utterances – whi...
November 29, 2022 at 23:09
November 29, 2022 at 20:38
What "argument"?
November 29, 2022 at 17:32