180 Proof

Comments

Excerpt from an old post (sans 'psychologism' creeping up in this thread)
December 04, 2022 at 01:27
Okay. :up: Now your projection is showing ...
December 04, 2022 at 00:15
Whatever. You reformulate what I've written just to shadowbox with strawmen. That's masturbatory, TM.
December 03, 2022 at 22:08
As pointed out already, these promises are implications of – implicit in – human eusociality. Tell me how we are eusocial without them in the absence ...
December 03, 2022 at 21:34
No. :roll: I'm quoting you (re: OP) as the rest of the sentence suggests.
December 03, 2022 at 21:24
Do you agree with Searle's concept of promises as institutional facts in which oughts are entailed? Insofar as we humans are a eusocial species, it se...
December 03, 2022 at 20:56
Your incomprehension exceeds even your otten poor reasoning, G. Neither "multiverse" nor "many worlds" are "scientific postulations". :sweat: Again, s...
December 03, 2022 at 19:43
It's a way of begging the question, that is, continuously pushing further back, or deferring, an answer e.g. "origin of universe?" god. "origin of god...
December 03, 2022 at 17:53
In: The Will  — view comment
:up:
December 03, 2022 at 07:19
"Reconcile with atheism"? Before that, it's question-begging (or an infinite regress) – doesn't make sense logically, ontologically or scientifically....
December 03, 2022 at 05:45
IIRC, H. Frankfurt describes bullshitting as – I paraphrase – complete self-serving disregard for the true/false distinction especially in (demogogic)...
December 03, 2022 at 04:28
I ask because you think "bullshitting" is "mostly detrimental to ethics" which makes no more sense than saying 'dyscalculia is mostly detrimental to m...
December 03, 2022 at 04:11
What do you thisnk ethics is about?
December 03, 2022 at 04:06
What you wrote doesn't make sense to me so I can't "disagree" with what you've written. For instance, Frankfurt's talking about political discourse, n...
December 03, 2022 at 04:02
Negation of yes.
December 03, 2022 at 03:54
:sweat: :meh: No.
December 03, 2022 at 03:53
I don't see how positing an "a priori" "first cause" "unmoved mover" entity explains anything (let alone "everything') more than occult non-explanatio...
December 03, 2022 at 03:51
?
December 03, 2022 at 03:32
Unless one is an anti-social sociopath, thereby lacks (common) empathy, I don't think "being ethical", as you put it, is difficult. Practice, however,...
December 03, 2022 at 02:03
I don't know of any concept or principle that "exists in a vacuum."
December 03, 2022 at 01:24
I don't think integrity requires commitment to "the platonic good".
December 03, 2022 at 00:37
Well ... ... the placebo effect works. I don't see how we cannot. Should we h. sapiens give up our civilized facades, or pretenses?
December 03, 2022 at 00:29
In: The Will  — view comment
Yes. 'Volitions' (i.e. more veto than volo) are only infrequent interruptions in involuntary systems, reflexes & habits (i.e. embodiment). I suspect, ...
December 03, 2022 at 00:10
No doubt.
December 02, 2022 at 21:13
Thanks. My memory is pretty good but often I confiirm quotes, etc with Google rather than pulling books or whatever from my stacks. A lifetime of stud...
December 02, 2022 at 21:13
This post is nonsense. C'mon, try harder to address what your interlocators are actually saying. Don't waste anybody's time. Read my objections to you...
December 02, 2022 at 20:52
On film? :fire: :eyes: https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/756269
December 02, 2022 at 11:15
In: Eureka!  — view comment
I "understand" his Incompleteness theorems only while I'm reading them or a learned synopsis of them. I guess I'm "stuck" at not being an adequate eno...
December 02, 2022 at 03:39
If not an epicurean god, then I would be a god that uses 'my godly power' to do only one thing: by fiat I'd remove every anti-social pathology / aptit...
December 02, 2022 at 03:26
Apophasis (e.g. apophatic theology).
December 02, 2022 at 02:23
I have. Derived from incoherent assumptions, your "points" lack merit. Now deal with my counterpoints if you can. :eyes: More empty rhetoric.
December 02, 2022 at 02:12
For me, she's the epitome of courage. :fire:
December 02, 2022 at 02:05
How we live. How we think.
December 01, 2022 at 06:52
How do you know that you "really know" this?
December 01, 2022 at 00:05
I suppose, defeasible reasoning and modern sciences notwithstanding, just as we cannot get rid of 'magical thinking' either. :sparkle:
December 01, 2022 at 00:01
:roll: :shade: :point: https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/759498
November 30, 2022 at 23:49
:smirk: Thanks. And in the spirit of @"Amity"'s OP, a George Harrison 'song of hope' (or joy in a minor key) as interpreted by Nina Simone https://m.y...
November 30, 2022 at 18:32
In: Eureka!  — view comment
Another time, mi amigo, it's 5am here ... :yawn: Besides, I suspect @"jgill" or @"Banno" can help you out with old Gödel.
November 30, 2022 at 13:10
"If I can't dance, I don't want to be part of your revolution." ~Emma Goldman "Hope as a feeling?" Pacifer, or placebo, for fear "Hope as an action?" ...
November 30, 2022 at 12:56
In: Eureka!  — view comment
Well Gödel shook Hilbert from that fever-dream. :smirk:
November 30, 2022 at 11:36
In: Eureka!  — view comment
My shorthand: to understand is to, explicitly or implicitly, contextualize discourses (i.e. narratives, maps, models), actions or events in order to o...
November 30, 2022 at 10:33
:100:
November 30, 2022 at 09:59
:smirk:
November 30, 2022 at 09:31
I think you're way off. Schrödinger's cat thought-experiment was proposed in order to show that quantum theory (re: superposition, measurement problem...
November 30, 2022 at 09:10
Norms are useful or not useful for some purpose; they are not truth-claims in any sense. A moral statement like "torture is wrong" is, to my way of th...
November 30, 2022 at 03:27
I've always thought that "multiverse" is a wildly extrapolated misunderstanding of Hugh Everett's many worlds interpretation of the interference patte...
November 30, 2022 at 03:08
Apparently, it hasn't occurred to you, Toothless, that "moral realism" is incoherent (re: assumption that moral statements are empirical propositions)...
November 30, 2022 at 00:16
Verificationism (i.e. Logical Positivism) doesn't make such distinctions and designates as "cognitively meaningless" all statements – utterances – whi...
November 29, 2022 at 23:09
November 29, 2022 at 20:38
What "argument"?
November 29, 2022 at 17:32