You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

180 Proof

Comments

You must believe we are not an eusocial species and that antisocial sociopathy is the norm rather than a pathology afflicting less than a twentieth of...
December 12, 2022 at 02:25
Quite astute of Baron d'Holbach considering the state of physics, astronomy, religious / cultural anthropology, etc in the late 18th century. Again, h...
December 12, 2022 at 00:50
:100: :up:
December 12, 2022 at 00:30
Richard Dawkins is a biologist by profession and education who also happens to be a very vocal atheist (without much philosophical credibility). Is he...
December 12, 2022 at 00:17
Habit. Substitute maintain homeostasis for "do good" and healthy for "ethical" and the question need not be asked. Of course not. Consider fairness an...
December 12, 2022 at 00:09
Perhaps. Still, I challenge you, Vera, to name at least one major world religion that completely lacks idols, superstition, conformity and/or scapegoa...
December 11, 2022 at 23:43
"Norse gods" aren't depicted looking like "Yoruba gods" or "Aztec gods". "Egypyian gods" aren't depicted as looking like "Roman or Celtic gods". "Abor...
December 11, 2022 at 23:37
:up: In other words, more broadly, science concerns forming explanations which we can mathematically agree on about nature in contrast to religion whi...
December 11, 2022 at 22:26
:up:
December 11, 2022 at 21:31
:eyes: :roll:
December 11, 2022 at 21:15
Sorry. None of what you've written makes sense to me or addresses the gist of the question of mine you've quoted.
December 11, 2022 at 19:33
:up: Btw, I'm not actually interested in what Kant thought about reality (noumenon) because his phenomenon-noumemon distinction seems to me one of Kan...
December 11, 2022 at 05:10
Isn't that the "reality beyond the 'for us'" – the limit or horizon of our reasoning, namely that reality necessarily encompasses its conception such ...
December 11, 2022 at 02:24
:chin:
December 10, 2022 at 22:49
Sounds to me like what neo-Scholastics call "hylomorphism".
December 10, 2022 at 22:36
:up:
December 10, 2022 at 22:26
:100:
December 10, 2022 at 22:22
Neither. :roll: "The output ... response" is physical. Another rhetorical question; you have no interest, Gnomon, in what anyone else, especially who ...
December 10, 2022 at 20:00
:100: Yeah, like "the brute existence" of g/G ... Keep in mind these few bon mots while reading what follows: Besides, Andrew, why must reality as who...
December 10, 2022 at 19:46
:up:
December 10, 2022 at 18:25
:cool:
December 10, 2022 at 09:02
In: Eureka!  — view comment
D'oh! :gasp:
December 10, 2022 at 04:12
:up: :up:
December 10, 2022 at 04:08
Never. :sweat:
December 10, 2022 at 04:06
I don't think evil can be explained.
December 10, 2022 at 04:01
Actually, IIRC, Einstein was a pantheist (in what he, like many, wrongly believe was aa Spinozist position) and not a pandeist. Many are pantheists; f...
December 10, 2022 at 03:59
Yes, of course, I'm only referring to Kant in the sense you bring him up in the OP.
December 10, 2022 at 03:22
Kant is not even wrong ... so Cabrera is a non-issue as far as I'm concerned.
December 10, 2022 at 01:54
So if "sacred scriptures" contain claims about human beings, the natural world, moral / social values, history, etc which the majority of non-literali...
December 10, 2022 at 01:50
Agreed, like theistic religions, based on imaginary deities (i.e. fictions), which are nihilistic. This is more like "Law" – permissible public conduc...
December 10, 2022 at 01:05
What makes these "moral issues" instead of political issues? What I'm trying to get at is what you mean by "moral" or "ethical" because that's where I...
December 10, 2022 at 00:02
"Moral issues" such as?
December 09, 2022 at 23:40
What explains "god"(-of-the-gaps)? If non-evident "god" is unexplainable – (the) brute fact, why not begin with the evident existence (or universe) as...
December 09, 2022 at 23:13
I think the link (and the other handle-link on the quote) clarifies my criticisms.
December 09, 2022 at 22:52
:up:
December 09, 2022 at 21:38
Oh please, man, we've done this dance before ... https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/578914
December 09, 2022 at 21:36
Cite those studies. Thanks.
December 09, 2022 at 21:28
:up:
December 09, 2022 at 21:27
In: Brains  — view comment
Memories, biases, discursive habits/grammars, expectations/beliefs, values, etc.
December 09, 2022 at 21:25
In: Brains  — view comment
No, as Daniel Dennett demonstrates, "the Cartesian Theatre" (i.e. homuncular theory) is completely incoherent. Also, contemporary neuroscience rules t...
December 09, 2022 at 20:53
Not true. Just because you do not accept my argument — you certainly haven't refuted it – doesn't indicate I haven't made an argument. Another showing...
December 09, 2022 at 20:48
Nothing I can add to the post you've replied to. My position remains that the OP's demonstration is invalid. If it makes sense to you, Astro Cat, then...
December 09, 2022 at 19:56
In: Brains  — view comment
Even the most veridical perceptions or experiences, I think, are virtual insofar as apprehension of the world is mediated. Illusions, biases, and othe...
December 09, 2022 at 19:51
No. I know that theism is not true (i.e. theistic deities are imaginary). I am irreligious because I think, in the wake and wreckage of millennia of s...
December 09, 2022 at 19:34
"Evil" ~ maximally bad (irreparable disvalue)? :chin: https://thephilosophyforum.com/discussion/comment/570228
December 09, 2022 at 18:40
Like testimonial evidence of "bleeding statues"? Gullible is as gullible does. :lol:
December 09, 2022 at 05:46
:100:
December 09, 2022 at 03:17
In: Brains  — view comment
Yes. The Great Confabulator ...
December 09, 2022 at 02:54
In what way does the following "credo" (from an old journal of mine written in 1992) preclude "the quest to find a deeper reality"?
December 09, 2022 at 02:48
Come back from irreverdible brain death with corroborable memories of an "afterlife". That would be proof. Anecdotes – eyewitness testimonies – are no...
December 09, 2022 at 02:31