You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

RogueAI

Comments

Thanks, Athena. I teach 6th grade, which is all subjects. I have the same group of kids all day (virtually, now).
January 31, 2021 at 17:47
That's funny you mention it, I just had a training on implicit bias. It was very good. No one was demonized. I think we need more of those trainings.
January 31, 2021 at 17:44
Thank you. Yeah, computerized grading helps. Same with deliberately not looking at names on assignments. This is mostly a problem when I'm doing final...
January 31, 2021 at 17:42
Talk about the time you fell for a logical fallacy.
January 31, 2021 at 17:28
When I'm grading students, and it's a tough call on the grade, I often find myself giving the black students a lower grade. I catch myself doing this ...
January 31, 2021 at 17:00
Good discussion!
December 22, 2020 at 16:53
That's a pretty cynical view, Kenosha. I'm not sure I buy it. I think I have a pretty good concept of, say, a million. Although, to your point, I have...
December 22, 2020 at 15:03
That's true. But your position entails that for any number over 143,672, when we do math we're not really understanding anything, we're just playing a...
December 22, 2020 at 14:44
I'm going to push back on this. I agree that for any absurdly long number, it's hard to imagine how we can hold it in our minds, and yet, for any numb...
December 22, 2020 at 14:20
The words and sentences get longer and longer. But you don't need to be able to think of an infinitely long number for this to be a problem for materi...
December 22, 2020 at 02:15
No, because the brain is finite in size. It can only be configured X many unique ways. If you had a brain that was thinking different thoughts for an ...
December 22, 2020 at 02:05
That's not my point, though. My point is it seems like there are an infinite number of possible thoughts to we can think of, and that's not possible, ...
December 22, 2020 at 01:25
There are infinitely many possible thoughts, since there are infinitely many numbers, and each number can be thought of (or is that true? Are there so...
December 21, 2020 at 23:46
There are only a finite number of birds possible.
December 21, 2020 at 23:37
It goes into a new body the next time the universe branches off.
December 12, 2020 at 02:55
We haven't made any progress on the Hard Problem. For the questionsHow are we conscious and Why are we conscious, science has nothing to say but conje...
December 09, 2020 at 19:16
No.
December 08, 2020 at 21:07
I don't think the brain produces consciousness because I think materialism is highly improbable (due to its ongoing failure to make progress on the Ha...
December 08, 2020 at 20:13
"You are the one that have asserted that neurology cannot produce consciousness." This doesn't make sense. I have asserted that it's highly improbable...
December 07, 2020 at 20:06
I don't accept the brain produces consciousness. The existence of some non-conscious stuff is simply asserted to be the case without a shred of eviden...
November 28, 2020 at 02:26
Solving the memory problem is an "easy" problem, because the answer is simply some brain mechanism. Solving the question: why does a working brain pro...
November 27, 2020 at 22:16
What progress? The theories about how matter produces consciousness are highly speculative, all over the map, and there's nothing close to a consensus...
November 27, 2020 at 15:59
Do you see the absurdity of your question? This is why I don't waste my time with Dennett or his followers. They inevitably end up doubting really obv...
November 26, 2020 at 21:48
Because the Hard Problem hasn't been solved. Ergo, the book you linked doesn't solve it. I don't think neuroscience is going to solve the hard problem...
November 26, 2020 at 20:56
You are confusing the easy problem (neural correlates of mental states) with the Hard Problem (how does non-conscious stuff produce conscious experien...
November 26, 2020 at 18:40
http://consc.net/papers/facing.html
November 26, 2020 at 18:37
This sounds like panpsychism. The matter that makes up the brain is intrinsically thinking/feeling stuff? I assume you mean neurons? What about the ma...
November 26, 2020 at 18:30
If we're making astonishing progress, shouldn't somebody have seen something that points the way to a mechanism by now? What's your timeframe on how l...
November 26, 2020 at 18:27
I've always wondered that too.
November 26, 2020 at 16:19
Talk of qualia muddies the water. Take something simple, like the pain of stubbing a toe. How does the feeling of pain emerge from non-thinking/feelin...
November 26, 2020 at 16:06
I said it was a hypothesis, not a particularly good one! In these discussions, I really am at a loss to explain how the Dennet's and Churchlands of th...
November 08, 2020 at 21:37
Have you heard of "aphantasia"? There are people out there who are really and truly different from other people when it comes to mental experiences. I...
November 08, 2020 at 20:43
I'm sorry, I totally misread what I quoted you as saying. Must be euphoria hangover from Biden winning. I read you as saying: if science can given an ...
November 08, 2020 at 18:59
Yes, a person from long ago wouldn't be able to figure out why there's lightning. It may be that we're in that position regarding consciousness, and i...
November 08, 2020 at 18:30
If materialism is right, and inanimate matter exists, there's an explanation for how it gives rise to conscious experience. We might never KNOW the ex...
November 08, 2020 at 17:21
What an odd thing to say. How does consciousness arise from inanimate matter? If that's not a hard problem, I guess there should be an answer to that ...
November 08, 2020 at 16:54
That was my avatar on a politics forum! Also, I saw a rainbow this morning for the first time since April (I live in the desert). I swear to god, ther...
November 07, 2020 at 23:52
This is what it's like talking to these Dennet types: Does it hurt when you stub your toe? Qualia is incoher- No, does it hurt when you stub your toe?...
November 07, 2020 at 23:33
No, by "failed" I mean the universe would not have been life-permitting had the constants been different. I should have been clearer. Setting aside is...
November 07, 2020 at 23:14
"My tablet, since you didn't like the multivariate argument, could have tipped the scales in favor of life. " Your tablet? I have no idea what you're ...
November 03, 2020 at 01:34
I have no idea what you said here.
November 02, 2020 at 22:13
Nonsense. The statement: "aliens, if they exist, aren't made of chocolate and don't have candy cane brains" is not irrational. It's true.
November 02, 2020 at 21:05
How does empiricism tell you that non-conscious stuff exists? Is there a hidden anti-panpsychist proof in empiricism?
November 02, 2020 at 17:43
What is your justification for assuming physical non-conscious stuff exists?
November 02, 2020 at 16:37
The bolded doesn't follow. Just because you can't find something in reality doesn't mean you conclude it doesn't exist, or you conclude that everythin...
November 02, 2020 at 16:32
Let's take the lottery example. Suppose someone wins the lottery. No big deal. Suppose that same person wins again next week. Big deal, but it happens...
November 02, 2020 at 16:00
Well, if we CAN be surprised by our existence, and a life-permitting universe (any kind of life) is highly highly improbable, then the fact that we fi...
November 02, 2020 at 00:17
No, I don't think it's any gods. The point is that your own existence CAN be considered surprising, in the firing squad scenario. Agreed? Or would you...
November 01, 2020 at 21:57
Of course you have an explanation of reporting activities. Reporting activities can't possibly mean reporting activities. We're talking about "reporti...
October 31, 2020 at 18:26
Isaac, do you believe it's possible you're not really conscious right now, as you're reading this? Do you think you can be talked into the belief "I a...
October 31, 2020 at 18:21