You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

dan1

['Member']Joined: January 01, 2017 at 04:07Last active: January 06, 2017 at 16:281 discussions7 comments

Discussions (1)

Comments

yes, youre very right. but again ou are not criticizing this article. he argues that the quran does contain logic which cannot be rejected
January 06, 2017 at 16:38
I think the gist of the writing indicates: 1. the fact that even intellectuals like millican and bouti (let alone students at oxford or elsewhere for ...
January 06, 2017 at 16:36
so far you havent analysed the guys writing. youve given your general perspective. it seems as though your determined to believe what you have before ...
January 03, 2017 at 14:42
I'm sure the author stresses the inductive nature of arguments for god on their own. he granted them deduction once we agree to a specific faith narra...
January 02, 2017 at 17:04
1. What possible questions can be posed to 'the argument from likelihood'? 2. I think the author makes it clear that the "overtones" of 1 religion is ...
January 01, 2017 at 23:04
I feel as though art enunciates the incapacity of reaching out to the ineffable: The Transcendent. Art proves metaphysical reality
January 01, 2017 at 22:44
The following is written by an up and coming Muslim specialist in theology regarding sceptical doubt and the Ash'ari school. Let's analyse his argumen...
January 01, 2017 at 04:14