You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

javra

Comments

OK, thanks for the comment. I'll myself shy from the term "designed" for, unlike the notion of purpose/end, the concept of "designed" does to me seem ...
July 05, 2024 at 17:54
As I think is in keeping with what @"Bob Ross" is saying: Same purpose everyone has: the obtainment of optimal eudemonia as end. (?) But this won't be...
July 05, 2024 at 16:25
Well, I didn't say "objective" but rather "in as objective a manner as currently fathomable to us humans"; the former either is or is not; the latter ...
July 05, 2024 at 03:36
Hey, I'll be maybe a little blunt. As often happens in this place, lots of opining on what is the case which purports itself as rational demonstration...
July 05, 2024 at 02:27
Logically there can, but one needs to make use of premises other than those of current mainstream religions (the very same with which most of today's ...
July 02, 2024 at 05:09
Got it. Thank you for the clarification. I'm in agreement.
July 02, 2024 at 03:58
A thoughtful OP. For me, non-duality is certainly helpful, if not pivotal, to my philosophical understandings. Yet this necessitates a very different ...
July 01, 2024 at 22:55
In respect to this, I'd be happy to change my terminology, this in terms of my use of "value" in the context of ethics, if I thought it might be helpf...
July 01, 2024 at 19:45
The example wasn't intended as a theory or truth, but as an illustration of where I find the pragmatic theory of truth wanting (and, again, there are ...
July 01, 2024 at 08:50
Hey, my bad, just found myself with time to spare :smile: So I'll reply presently. I see we analyze this issue via very different schemas. But to firs...
July 01, 2024 at 08:23
By some, sure, but how would this relate to the Good as that via which we, for one example, discern that a correct argument is good and an incorrect a...
July 01, 2024 at 03:09
Just remembered this old thread. You've edited your reply I see. Anyways, as far as my (semi-) good name goes, to be clear, I here honestly expressed ...
July 01, 2024 at 02:51
Glad to confirm that you do not sponsor the entailment which I so far see in you affirming, to restate the quote: You were. I am here applying what I ...
July 01, 2024 at 00:37
I find all this to be a very adequate assessment. Which is to say, :up: As a possible complexity, analytical issues could then emerge as to what the t...
June 30, 2024 at 22:59
I'd add to Wayfarer's term "non-existence", more specifically, the non-occurrence of any awareness via which value can obtain. If so, then this end-po...
June 30, 2024 at 22:39
Just saw these posts. Just in case you'll revisit the website ... Instead of inadvertently getting bogged down with the details of interpretation, I'l...
June 30, 2024 at 22:06
Despite spending time on the forum, you’ve chosen to make your reply rather late. The weekend has now passed, and I now have real world duties in need...
May 06, 2024 at 04:53
To address this first point you make that Kant's notion of a Kingdom of Ends is only (an inconsequential?) ideal, this parer, which I previously refer...
May 05, 2024 at 05:29
While I'm waiting for your reply: This quote addresses means, but not the stipulated end of "minimizing harm and maximizing harmony" which, as end pur...
May 04, 2024 at 21:30
Got it. And according to you in which way does Kant use the term Kingdom of Ends?
May 04, 2024 at 19:20
Your answer does not answer my question, but instead seeks to analyze Kant's true intentions. There are quotes such as: Act according to maxims of a u...
May 04, 2024 at 19:14
And how do you view this stipulated end as differing from Kant's Kingdom of Ends?
May 04, 2024 at 19:00
OK, If indeed now only means, means toward what?
May 04, 2024 at 18:56
Am I mistaken in understanding the quote to conclude that my arguments make use of contradictions? And does not a contradiction require that incongrue...
May 04, 2024 at 18:26
I can very much respect this point of view in certain respects - especially when it comes to interpretations such as those of Social Darwinism. Nevert...
May 03, 2024 at 17:14
I will second this affirmation. One’s either consciously held or else unconsciously maintained metaphysical presuppositions will guide how one makes s...
May 03, 2024 at 16:51
Well said. ---- As a general apropos to possible religious/spiritual views, Buddhism, for one example, has had this creed of "no origin" for a few mil...
May 03, 2024 at 07:01
Yes, good point. This is where philosophical issues enter the picture ... the problem of other minds applied to real world applications regarding less...
May 03, 2024 at 06:52
That all evolution is in essence entirely accidental is a mischaracterization of evolution via natural selection. In short, NS is the favoring of cert...
May 03, 2024 at 05:40
I find that the OP muddles the issue by not differentiating between different types of thoughts a consciousness can be aware of. Regardless of where o...
May 02, 2024 at 22:59
Ah. That explains that then. Thanks.
May 02, 2024 at 19:45
I agree with much of your post in regard to the issue of evolution. But I would like to verify what you interpret by the term "Deism". Are you using a...
May 02, 2024 at 19:36
You've never read Venus on the Half-Shell, then? As was told, the protagonist who wants an answer to "why are we birthed only to suffer and die?" at l...
May 02, 2024 at 18:13
I believe I’m most certainly an outlier, but I’ll answer the question just the same. In short, evolution happened naturally, such that Nature itself i...
May 02, 2024 at 17:49
Political correctness as concept has always been problematic for me. This because it can be all too easily used in Orwellian manners by antisocial peo...
April 30, 2024 at 18:57
Ciao, then.
April 29, 2024 at 01:15
Wait for it ... Nope, it wasn't. As a refresher: Does not translate into: And you haven't answered the question I asked regarding the science. Somewha...
April 29, 2024 at 01:00
Not what I quite explicitly stated. Do you disagree with the linked to science?
April 29, 2024 at 00:54
As I so far understand the positions held, to me the issue of direct v. indirect realism is misplaced—not because it’s not important or else handwavin...
April 29, 2024 at 00:04
To keep things short, I don't find that my account of ethics would make any sense whatsoever were it to in fact incorporate "contradictions", which I ...
April 28, 2024 at 16:51
Are you equating these models to what science in essence is? If you are, you then seem to disagree with my appraisals of what empirical science consis...
April 27, 2024 at 22:55
In my own, maybe all too imperfect, intentions to be of help, I’ll express my own views regarding the many at times contradictory, and often non-intui...
April 27, 2024 at 19:27
I see that I was addressing many presumptions which are not shared. This for instance. By "obstacle" I naturally assumed that that which stands in the...
April 27, 2024 at 04:52
:up: I think hard determinism can have a mind of its own, meaning that it could find justification even for this. But yes, I'm in general agreement wi...
April 27, 2024 at 02:44
I’ll for now address the following last portion of your first reply since I see this as pivotal to most all of the other replies I might myself give. ...
April 27, 2024 at 02:40
Only in an attempt to further your argument: Hunger is a physiological sensation or pang. The experiencing of hunger, though, does not even necessitat...
April 26, 2024 at 19:21
I skimmed through the paper. The principal example given - that of killing one person to save five - has always been irksome to me due to its ambiguit...
April 26, 2024 at 03:48
I'm myself finding it a good means of honing my reasoning skills (or lack thereof :smile: ) Myself, I so far find the idealizations of what should be ...
April 26, 2024 at 00:50
Just wanted to say I'm in agreement with what you've expressed. ...Including your accolades regarding @"Count Timothy von Icarus"'s posts. :up:
April 25, 2024 at 03:54
Here is a hypothetical wherein the choice made is concluded to be amoral (this strictly in the sense of being neither blameworthy nor praiseworthy) de...
April 25, 2024 at 03:43