You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Gnomon

Comments

Although your question is completely off-target, I'll answer a similar unstated question, which is pertinent to this thread. This response is mainly f...
March 03, 2023 at 23:34
Sadly, Fallacy lists can be used by both sides in a debate. For example, often labels me as slander slinger of "Ad Hominems", when that is his own fav...
March 03, 2023 at 23:07
That's because my replies are tailored to the posts I'm responding to ; reflecting biases back to you. may be a bit more absolutist (Black vs White) t...
March 03, 2023 at 18:25
"Who's zooming who?" __Aretha Franklin "Intolerant AntiTheism uses emotional WooBoo labels as substitutes for logical arguments" __Gnomon Philosophica...
March 03, 2023 at 16:47
No. It was you & 180 who painted Enformationism as "Theistic". Gnomon denied that denigrating mis-characterization, but accepted the philosophical lab...
March 02, 2023 at 18:28
No. In Wilfred Sellars words : "stop attacking your own Manifest Image, then claiming to vanquish Gnomon's metaphors". :joke:
February 28, 2023 at 22:43
It's amusing to picture you and celebrating & high-fiving & thumbs-uping your victorious vanquishing of a mythical dragon. Unfortunately, that superna...
February 28, 2023 at 18:34
Unfortunately, when I refer to the feedback loops in Mind & Nature, in terms of "Holism", I get negative feedback -- as-if the notion is anti-scientif...
February 28, 2023 at 01:34
Yes. Some theories of Consciousness as a form of Information (e.g. Integrated Information Theory) attempt to construct Self-Awareness by adding-up bit...
February 26, 2023 at 18:57
Since you have me pegged as an anti-science god-fearing religious nut, I feel obligated to tell you what I'm giving-up for Lent : Epistemic Gaslighter...
February 26, 2023 at 16:17
Perhaps I should have added (material) after "physical" in the quote. For most of us, "physical" implies "matter-based", and "mathematical" implies lo...
February 25, 2023 at 19:14
Tu quoque. :joke: I stopped responding to , not because I was offended by his skepticism of an unorthodox philosophical concept, or even his off-targe...
February 25, 2023 at 18:40
In: Emergence  — view comment
EnFormAction is envisioned somewhat like a computer program processing Information (matter & energy) in order to produce the phenomena that we interpr...
February 24, 2023 at 23:21
# Manifest existence? : yes, the real physical world (Spinoza's Substance*1). # Deism = Theism? : philosophical Deists will disagree. Deist? Yes / The...
February 24, 2023 at 19:08
Oh no, you've got me pegged. Just in the wrong hole. You get frustrated by my denials of your peg-holes. Which leads you to conclude that I'm being eq...
February 23, 2023 at 23:15
Yes. Introspection is subjective, hence not subject to empirical verification. Which makes it debatable, as in Philosophy, rather than established, as...
February 23, 2023 at 19:10
Yes. Those who are arguing against my Information-based thesis, are treating it as-if it's a Theistic Religious doctrine, which subordinates Science t...
February 23, 2023 at 18:55
In: Emergence  — view comment
Sorry. I was referring to the anti-open-question stance of Logical Positivism*1, which I guessed influenced your negative attitude toward my non-relig...
February 23, 2023 at 18:38
When I joined this forum, being rather naive of the current state of philosophy, I was surprised to have my philosophical reasoning & conjectures chal...
February 23, 2023 at 01:29
In: Emergence  — view comment
Probably not. Information is both physical (info=energy=matter) and metaphysical (meaning ; ideas ; math). EnFormAction is my coinage for the Generic ...
February 23, 2023 at 00:53
In: Emergence  — view comment
No, I merely missed the "information" and focused on the "technological" when I first read that line. Which is ironic in view of my information-centri...
February 22, 2023 at 18:16
In: Emergence  — view comment
Did actually refer to an "information singularity", or is that your interpretation of his intention? I ask, because he and have been ridiculing my 21s...
February 21, 2023 at 23:15
In: Emergence  — view comment
As usual, you and interpret my philosophical & technical terminology differently from my intention. You are reading meanings into my words, instead of...
February 21, 2023 at 19:04
In: Emergence  — view comment
OK, what are your "terms" for discussing a novel philosophical worldview? 180's terms seem to be those proposed by the Vienna Circle (materialism ; at...
February 20, 2023 at 23:37
In: Emergence  — view comment
He says that Gnomon's reasoning is "empty and boring", but 180's countless repetitious replies imply that something about those reasons is hitting hom...
February 20, 2023 at 19:03
In: Arche  — view comment
Most world religions are motivated by faith in a cultural worldview, and/or by obeisance to a politico-religious regime. Yet Christianity was unique i...
February 20, 2023 at 17:38
In: Arche  — view comment
I think the Author of John's gospel was trying to rationalize the death of the Christian Messiah/King before his mission was accomplished. So, he argu...
February 19, 2023 at 23:31
In: Emergence  — view comment
Since I have no formal training in Philosophy, it has taken me a while to realize that you and are arguing from a Logical Positivism position, which s...
February 19, 2023 at 19:01
In: Emergence  — view comment
I originally posted on the Emergent thread because the general concepts of "emergence" and "information processing" are essential to my idiosyncratic ...
February 18, 2023 at 18:59
Sounds like you are an Agnostic. Which is a legitimate philosophical position on the notion of an invisible causal force in the world. Are you also "r...
February 17, 2023 at 23:17
In: Emergence  — view comment
Thanks, but my idiosyncratic god-model doesn't even fit the Fortuna pigeonhole. Did you notice the PS in my previous post? :cool:
February 17, 2023 at 22:16
In: Emergence  — view comment
Speaking of "cherry picking" you are selecting only the low-hanging fruit of religious meanings of "god", and ignoring the philosophical meanings. Do ...
February 17, 2023 at 19:05
In: Arche  — view comment
If by "the Greeks" you mean philosophical thinkers, the necessity for knowing the "arche" is inherent in the frame of reference. Typically, most peopl...
February 17, 2023 at 18:19
I agree. But, considering the limited range of world experience of ancient people, it's understandable that even smart adult people would imagine thei...
February 17, 2023 at 01:55
Those "shoulds" imply a moral obligation to the "truth" of Physics, as opposed to the "falsehoods" of Religion. The assertion of final authority for E...
February 17, 2023 at 01:37
In: Emergence  — view comment
I don't know. What do you think are your absolute values? True vs False? How do you know which is which? Whatever they are, they seem to be toward the...
February 17, 2023 at 00:03
In: Emergence  — view comment
Whoa! That's an emphatic two-handed rejection. I described Deism simply as a "non-religious philosophical position". How does your quote differ, excep...
February 16, 2023 at 23:51
In: Emergence  — view comment
The insult is in your interpretation. FWIW, I never intend to offend. The wry remark was intended as an ironic all-too-true joke-poke, to be accepted ...
February 16, 2023 at 17:43
In: Emergence  — view comment
Yes. "Holism" and "Emergence" are essential concepts in the thesis of Enformationism, which derives from the epistemological (what can we know?) chall...
February 16, 2023 at 17:13
In: Emergence  — view comment
Yes. Thanks for engaging in an extended dialogue, which is probably frustrating for you, due to the language barrier. The basic problem is that we ass...
February 16, 2023 at 01:26
In: Emergence  — view comment
No. I'm merely trying to untie the ropes of anti-metaphysical prejudice that dump all non-physical notions into the anti-science (religious) waste-bin...
February 15, 2023 at 17:54
Yes. I sometimes identify myself as an agnostic Deist. I have no direct experience of the putative deity of my theory, merely circumstantial evidence,...
February 14, 2023 at 23:33
As Kant pointed out, personal experiences are the only evidence of ding an sich Reality that we humans have, from which to construct our worldviews an...
February 14, 2023 at 19:05
In: Emergence  — view comment
No. I did not know that. Any resemblance to String Theory is coincidental, not intentional. But, I guess I can see a family resemblance, in that Strin...
February 14, 2023 at 18:09
Particles of stuff (atoms), as the elementary element of Physics, has been gradually & grudgingly superseded by nonlocal continuum Fields of informati...
February 14, 2023 at 18:02
In: Emergence  — view comment
In the introduction to my new book, The Logic of Information, by philosopher Luciano Floridi, I found an attractive concept that reminds me of our due...
February 14, 2023 at 17:14
There's no need to "reject" Reductionism as the method for scientific analysis (dissection) of Nature into its elements. There's still some de-constru...
February 13, 2023 at 23:40
In: Emergence  — view comment
Although dispassionate & boring in person, Gnomon is passionate & evangelistic in writing, about his personal worldview, which serves as a late-bloomi...
February 13, 2023 at 19:20
In: Emergence  — view comment
No. If anything, I'm trying to dampen down your prejudiced incredulity level. This is not a Physics forum, so I am not claiming to have physical evide...
February 13, 2023 at 18:28
In: Emergence  — view comment
Yes, my philosophy is BothAnd, not Either/Or. So, my responses are not wishy-washy, but simply tailored to how the question is framed. As the PhysicsF...
February 12, 2023 at 19:01