Sorry, didn't notice any questions that you may have asked me. I understand that certain people have an agenda to eliminate mind for specific reasons....
If you may remember, when you asked me the question, I was able to give you a one sentence, coherent, easily understandable definition. The c rain is ...
What I have been able to glean is that they is no experience, no mind, just a relation which is the experience. An experience without an experiencer. ...
The experience or relation (relation had already been delivered as consciousness) without an experiencer. Works fine, except everyone experiences thin...
It appears to me that the sentences and the overall story is being presented in lieu of any evidence. Now as for the story itself, I find it pretty in...
Different life experiences. I am much more interested in life than in gadgets. I have discovered that there is much, much more good health and joy in ...
Science provides some practical tools that can be developed based upon creative insights, but these tools acting on the the experience are not the exp...
Yes, it fits but descriptively it is much different. Viewing the body and cells as a complete holistic, cooperative mind provides a different path to ...
Both papers are about dividing up the experience of living into a measurement/location map. Should measurement be given ontological status? This is th...
What do you think is thinking? Do you ever spend any time observing your mind at work? Right now it is trying to figure out how to bring chemicals to ...
It's called consciousness. No materialist paper has ever been written about consciousness without injecting consciousness into matter. Look for one th...
More than this, I am asking how they (the chemicals) got the notion that they have function? I know you understand the notion of function because you ...
Since when does a tube of chemicals view themselves as having a function? Agreed, that the idea is very simple and simplistic. Chemicals are coming to...
For those who are interested: https://www.academia.edu/3848148/Holoinformational_Consciousness_An_Extension_of_Interactive_Dualism_with_Anticipatory_P...
https://www.southampton.ac.uk/news/2017/01/holographic-universe.page "Professor Kostas Skenderis of Mathematical Sciences at the University of Southam...
https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2017/01/170130083231.htm "A UK, Canadian and Italian study has provided what researchers believe is the first ob...
Yes, but if you wish to be creative, then you have to be creative - and very patient. Creativity takes time. In a way replacing one word with 10,000 w...
There is nothing to unite. It is a unity. Matter can be considered decayed mind. Mind is fundamental. There are many interesting things to discover in...
Yes, there the the mind. Don't allow yourself to be conditioned not to use it. :) There is really no hurdle, it is simply the mind. The only hurdle is...
Yes. It is all mind. It is important to understand the process of being accepted and getting ahead in academia - no mind! For this reason, rather stra...
It is not a back door. Quite simply, it is teaching the cellular minds and the bigger minds (Sheldrake's moronic resonance forms) new habits or new wa...
Everyone has challenges in their lives of different sorts. All are unique to the individual's evolving self. There are no shortcuts. Everything takes ...
Yes, that is what I replied. It is your own mind that you are calling God. The label is not that important though each entail certain attributes, such...
Real yes, but not the same. One is certainly more substantial than the other. This is the direction of creativity. First we imagine it (it is real), a...
No, it is embedded in the field, not outside of it. You might even say it is it. You can may visualize it as a wave traveling through water. The brain...
Everything is out there and it all can be considered memory stored in the fabric of the universe. You b just have to think of memory differently, not ...
The key points are: 1) The field is real and is out there. There is nothing in the brain. 2) The brain is a transmitter/receiver. It reveals elements ...
Relativity is only about transformation of measurements between frames of reference. It v should not be given any ontological significance. My b recom...
Bergson, Robbins, and myself are pretty much on the money. Apparently you do not understand the references provided. Exactly what what was being propo...
Yes, everything is a difference in vibration. Not too far from string theory. The question it's how does the mind distinguish vibrations into various ...
Once the act is exposed, the magician will never acquiesce. After all magic is his livelihood. It is up to the audience to shake its head and walk awa...
It is. The secret sauce of the recipe is buried in 10,000 words hoping that no one will find it or notice. Everything single research paper supporting...
https://resonance.is/observational-tests-holographic-cosmology/ "Quantum gravity offers such new physics unifying the cosmological and quantum scales ...
What we are observing it's exactly, precisely what we observe in every day existence: we are creative minds that are exploring, making choices, introd...
No reason you can't use the word God, but you might as well just call it Mind, after all it is your mind and all of our minds that are doing it all, s...
This was the essential object that Bergson had to Relativity. Robbins raises the same objection. It is one thing to say that the equations are useful....
There it goes. I'm confused. OK. I'm OK with that. As I said, I invite others to investigate and come to their own conclusions. Beware, as Bergson war...
All of the implications of Newton's theories contradict SR. You can't say there is a preferred frame a reference (Newton), then say there isn't (SR), ...
Whoops! All those books on SR need to be pulled from the library shelves immediately. This can be a PR nightmare. What should we do about the millions...
Comments