This is a misunderstanding that my aim is to destroy morality. No, my aim is exactly the same as all ethical systems, albeit the mindset is fundamenta...
Jesus Christ. Even though the argument is over, let me show why it is so: You deliberately misunderstand my point, presumably because you're emotional...
Please be patient. I'm subtly showing the progressiveness of my model, how that's the next step of civilization. Think of it like this: Pre-civilizati...
This is dangerously close to an argumentum ad passiones. After all, the very foundation of society is to NOT be 100% loyal to our emotions! Before civ...
All your objections seem to be raw emotional responses to counterintuitive thinking. In my hypothetical society, I'd be surprised if you were to poke ...
You're defining morality as a state of emotion, but I thought morality is a label that's applied to what we think each other ought to behave, so that ...
My model is not remotely as extreme as teaching kids not to feel pain. Instead, my model can work even though everyone still feels emotional pain (and...
Actually, you wouldn't give a fuck about forcing anyone to do anything in the first place. Unless you're a sociopath, of course, but I believe a socie...
Exactly, works for me too, heck it had been an epiphany for me after spending my teenage years giving a fuck about how people around me should behave ...
It's not circular if I've got a plan in mind for making everyone not giving a fuck. Look, we waste a lot of resources teaching kids they don't need to...
You're right; though this is also exactly why my model can only work if everyone in the world stops giving a fuck at the same time together. Highly im...
I understand. However, the tragedy of the commons happens when people living in a communistic society still give a fuck. In my model, people would not...
Good thing is that we can agree to disagree on this. My proposition is that to not give a fuck is a solution to problems that morality can't solve, an...
I gotta admit, I wouldn't. But again, my solution only works in everyone stops giving a fuck together at once. According to my understanding of psycho...
Well, no, because I'm not asking for John's respect in the first place, and I don't feel proud of owning anything because I know I'd lose them anyway ...
You consider the Big Bang to be an actual natural event, but I think it's just a label we apply to ''the beginning of the universe'', and nothing else...
You consider the Big Bang to be an actual natural event, but I think it's just a label we apply to ''the beginning of the universe'', and nothing else...
This is pretty fallacious...is Zuckerberg a reptilian just because he looks like one? And if something's out of spacetime, then by definition it isn't...
OK, fair enough--but just wonderin' though, on what basis do you argue for the existence of God using PSR? As we've established, if spacetime is withi...
Poetic, but actually this is kind of contradictory. First of all, you got the conclusion ''we don't matter'' from a cosmic standpoint, yet the cosmos ...
Thanks for clearing things up. I'll replace time with spacetime. Yes, if spacetime is within the universe instead of something that encompasses the un...
Yes, everything in TIME needs a cause, and you may argue that therefore the universe had a creator. But that's assuming that the universe ITSELF is bo...
Comments