You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

NOS4A2

Comments

As these things go, the arguments for Social Justice become unintelligible when they are premised on methodological collectivism. It involves positing...
February 09, 2023 at 19:11
Each term represents the misapprehension of human biology, though I think Self is more applicable. Their referent is perpetually absent or hidden from...
February 05, 2023 at 00:03
To me, organ donation is morally wrong if the donor does not consent. The same is true of human incubators, which is its own kind of organ donation. W...
February 04, 2023 at 20:59
Presumably the bodies are kept alive in order to be used for the period of gestation. So there is the added question of: should these brain-dead peopl...
February 04, 2023 at 19:31
Spinoza made lenses for a living and was still able to produce some musings during his short life.
February 04, 2023 at 18:41
To me the judge isn't the sole proprietor of brain-dead human beings, so I would disregard his decision as illegitimate and unethical.
February 04, 2023 at 18:40
A disturbing paper, but very interesting. I never knew of the opt-out system. I have to object from the get-go because there is no justification as to...
February 04, 2023 at 17:52
This thread has turned out to be a nice little compendium of the presumption of guilt and its propaganda. 6 years of hoax, fake news, and nothingburge...
February 03, 2023 at 16:20
I’m speaking of those in the state who give bailouts and subsidies. Milton Friedman said we don’t need central banks, that if it was up to him he woul...
February 01, 2023 at 22:43
It was not so much window-dressing as it was an attempt to climb out of a number of ideological failures: the failure of state socialism, the failure ...
February 01, 2023 at 19:17
Neosocialism? Neo-social democracy? The big mistake about the neoliberalism theory is that it puts people like Tony Blair, Bill Clinton, Obama, and Bi...
February 01, 2023 at 18:23
I appreciate it. The availability of guns certainly contributes to the use of them. There is no question about that. But gun control laws have steadil...
January 29, 2023 at 18:20
There is a perfectly good thread here. Our interlocutors have every right to share their own opinion, as well.
January 29, 2023 at 16:35
I’ve just want to know of a single neoliberal policy that has led to a single death of despair, which for some odd reason includes mass shootings.
January 29, 2023 at 16:22
Let’s hear it.
January 29, 2023 at 16:15
Note, the connection cannot be made. He fails his own test.
January 29, 2023 at 16:11
It appears to me that one ought to be equally cautious because the religious denomination has yet to prove itself to be any sort of mitigating factor ...
January 29, 2023 at 15:01
It should be easy to name one neoliberal policy that contributed to just one school schooling.
January 29, 2023 at 14:33
No neoliberal policy or lack thereof put a gun in anyone’s hand, I’m afraid. The Swiss government, on the other hand, does offer guns to every conscri...
January 29, 2023 at 14:01
So stupid is it that false analogies are your only recourse. How does a government impact your life without a policy?
January 29, 2023 at 12:21
I suppose if one depends on the state as a child does on the nipple, the disappearance of one precludes the suffering of the other. Perhaps a process ...
January 29, 2023 at 00:25
The “real self” is already apparent. You are witness to it, conversing with it, and interacting with it. You need not traverse anything to find it. It...
January 28, 2023 at 19:34
That’s a good point. A policy can only have impact if it forces someone to do something or act in a particular way. The repealing or absence of such a...
January 28, 2023 at 18:24
Note that no connection between “neoliberalism” and a single feeling of despair has been made, much less to any number of them—nor could it. So far, i...
January 28, 2023 at 02:22
Wherever the right to life, speech, to hear, is violated to serve some distant end, the censor is engaging in morally wrong behavior. That’s why I add...
January 26, 2023 at 19:51
We can quibble about one sentence quoted out of context but I think it remains pretty clear if the rest is considered.
January 26, 2023 at 19:30
I’m wondering how the censor can know and be confident that his act of censorship was the right thing to do. It was morally wrong to murder Socrates a...
January 26, 2023 at 19:03
You cannot say whether the act saved us or not from what you promised it would. Without this knowledge how can you say it was morally good? I said it ...
January 26, 2023 at 18:43
I’m not a utilitarian. The argument was epistemological and ethical. We can never know if an act of censorship protected us from the ill effects we we...
January 26, 2023 at 18:03
The interplay between euphemism and dysphemism is an interesting subject in rhetoric, worthy of analysis. To avoid either, one might try to substitute...
January 25, 2023 at 18:01
The distortion of the truth, ie. lying, is different than the suppression of truth, ie. censorship. One can be straightened out while the other simply...
January 25, 2023 at 17:44
Irony, satire, myth, caricature, sarcasm, metaphor, hyperbole—deception is a function of language just like any other articulated sound from the mouth...
January 25, 2023 at 17:43
Presupposing that man is fallible leads me to conclude that he should not have the power to determine and enforce what only the infallible ever could....
January 24, 2023 at 23:49
My point is that it is unjust and illogical to deny the right to to receive and impart information to all people at all times when only some people at...
January 24, 2023 at 19:39
When the NYT released the Pentagon papers the government argued that to release them was a threat to national security. It turns out this was hot air,...
January 24, 2023 at 17:50
You’re right on that. F?at j?stitia ruat cælum is a precious principle to me.
January 24, 2023 at 17:38
It doesn’t follow that because someone reads something he invariably accepts it. It doesn’t follow that because a kind of information is unacceptable ...
January 24, 2023 at 17:35
Do you accept everything you read? It doesn’t follow that because one reads something he invariably accepts it. It doesn’t follow that because a kind ...
January 24, 2023 at 01:01
The utility of censorship and the benefit to those who practice it is without question. The government and its supporters no doubt benefit from the ce...
January 24, 2023 at 00:50
Because we're neither children nor slaves. Such behavior is unjust and stupid.
January 23, 2023 at 18:42
I have given no such right because I do not know an answer to the question of who knows better than I do what I can or cannot read and write. Maybe yo...
January 23, 2023 at 18:29
The “spread of misinformation”…so fearful are we of such a spread that we will give the power to censor misinformation to those who are historically a...
January 23, 2023 at 17:38
“Measurable harms”? Like what?
January 23, 2023 at 17:29
I always face the insoluble problem of who I would give the right to decide what I can or cannot say and read, as if I was a child or student. I canno...
January 23, 2023 at 17:26
Looks like the FBI found more classified documents, even after we are told Biden and his team have been forthcoming and returned everything willingly ...
January 22, 2023 at 18:01
Take a look at the Index Librorum Prohibitorum to get a sense of the vandal’s project. Voltaire, Montesquieu, John Locke, Hume, Balzac—more than a few...
January 22, 2023 at 17:51
I would prefer 1 to 2. Then again I’m not sure what kind of security I risk losing. The hypothetical seems to me to make no sense because the two are ...
January 22, 2023 at 17:45
Thanks for writing that. Not unlike your own experiences, Justice Holmes used the “fire in a crowded theater” theory to justify jailing dissidents who...
January 22, 2023 at 00:13
I think you’re right. The overlap of rights causes a sort of schism. My belief in property rights, for example, suggests that people can restrict anot...
January 22, 2023 at 00:09
Joe Biden may have inadvertently funded his son’s procurement of Russian prostitutes, who may or may not have been involved in human trafficking. http...
January 19, 2023 at 19:14