You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

NOS4A2

Comments

Perhaps. But I doubt if everyone owned a gun people would start shooting each other.
March 28, 2023 at 16:52
So injustice is beneficial so long as it suits your concerns. I cannot abide by that, myself.
March 28, 2023 at 16:49
I doubt I could muster enough conceit to find any desire to control your's or anyone else's life.
March 28, 2023 at 16:44
Then why don’t you put everyone in prison? You’ll eliminate violence entirely.
March 28, 2023 at 16:37
I think murderers and criminals will think twice about harming others if they know everyone is packing. So I think the world I want to live in is a pe...
March 28, 2023 at 16:27
That’s why utilitarianism is unjust. You’ll punish people for things they haven’t done. That is what I am going through right now. After a mass shooti...
March 28, 2023 at 16:25
If someone has the motive and desire to run people over they will do so. If they don’t, they won’t. The same is with guns or any other object that can...
March 28, 2023 at 16:16
Is this a quiz? I am entitled to my guns because I own them. I have a basic human right to defend my life, liberty, and property, and owning weapons e...
March 28, 2023 at 16:10
It’s unjust because they are mine, I am entitled to them, and I have done nothing to justify taking them away.
March 28, 2023 at 16:06
Everyone should carry a weapon as soon as they are competent enough to do so, in my opinion.
March 28, 2023 at 16:05
It’s unjust to ban my weapons if I didn’t shoot anyone or do not intend to.
March 28, 2023 at 16:05
Why can I not own a firearm if I didn’t shoot anyone or do not intend to?
March 28, 2023 at 16:00
It’s meant to be faulty. Guns and cars don’t just go out and start killing people. It leaves out the motives and reasons why one would pick up a gun a...
March 28, 2023 at 15:54
Utilitarian concerns don’t mean much to me wherever we are speaking about basic human rights. Banning cars would be unjust. Banning guns is unjust.
March 28, 2023 at 15:51
Sure it can. Before that it was car accidents. Maybe we should ban cars. There should be armed guards at schools in the US, perhaps even teachers, in ...
March 28, 2023 at 15:34
I thought the shooter was a male. I was wrong. It was indeed a female. So it is uncharacteristic after all.
March 28, 2023 at 15:15
Most mass shooters are male.
March 28, 2023 at 15:02
A transgender shooter. It might not be as uncharacteristic as we’d like to admit.
March 28, 2023 at 04:25
Well said. Our periphery is quite limited, so one can at least understand the indirect realist’s skepticism. The body is no doubt a mystery for any or...
March 28, 2023 at 03:08
The so-called directness of perception is useful only to contrast with the indirectness of perception, as it is put forward by indirect realists. It h...
March 28, 2023 at 00:24
It does, I’m afraid, much to the chagrin subjectivists. Their “hard problems” and other efforts are little more than an attempt to muddy the waters, p...
March 27, 2023 at 18:12
My guess is you need to expand your Self to the surface of your being, your skin. Note the following argument which you presented: It assumes that you...
March 27, 2023 at 17:56
Again, we know what is different about the color-blind man and the man who is not. These causes are biological. The “inner quality” is the biology. Wh...
March 27, 2023 at 17:45
Just to be precise, no, their biology is different. This conforms to the relationship and the facts of biology. The “character of their experience” is...
March 27, 2023 at 16:51
It’s easy to maintain direct realism with your scenario because the relationship between person and the apple is direct. X perceives Y. Working with t...
March 27, 2023 at 16:23
It’s not in all-caps.
March 26, 2023 at 03:29
The fact our eyes point outwards is something the indirect realist is unable to overcome. But the matter is simple. The contact with the rest of the w...
March 26, 2023 at 02:02
“What kind of person can charge another person, in this case a former President of the United States, who got more votes than any sitting President in...
March 25, 2023 at 15:14
So no, it isn’t true that “Once an individual is born, they are immediately part of a society that may not fully align with their values and principle...
March 24, 2023 at 02:36
Did you or did you not make the assertion that a newborn is immediately part of a society that may or may not fully align with his values and principl...
March 24, 2023 at 00:00
The fear of you acting on them influences me, the voter.
March 23, 2023 at 16:44
It does matter because one’s values and principles cannot be violated upon birth if there are no values and principles. One requires life and living i...
March 23, 2023 at 16:43
It certainly does influence voters. It does so because people will believe you will act on your threat. Are Russian tweets and Facebook ads the unjust...
March 23, 2023 at 16:37
I never brought up the influence angle, but should you remain consistent, maybe you can alter my mind with your words enough so as to influence me to ...
March 23, 2023 at 16:30
How does a newborn come into the world with values and principles?
March 23, 2023 at 16:23
Perhaps given your propensity for sorcery you can move me with your words to believe the same as you do.
March 23, 2023 at 16:20
Again, your words are not influencing anything. My belief that you may act on your words do. Is this going completely over your head?
March 23, 2023 at 16:13
Threatening civil unrest lets people know your intentions, that you may become belligerent should things not go your way, and threat of this future ac...
March 23, 2023 at 16:09
Yeah, sorry, your words are still not influencing anything. They do not have the causal effects you pretend they do. Your words only reveal what you t...
March 23, 2023 at 16:03
Given the mass violence and rioting of that year, you don’t think threatening the country with more civil unrest is any kind of threat to voters?
March 23, 2023 at 15:42
No need to lie about this. If altering election laws in the run up to a contentious election is “democracy” and “making it easier for voters to vote”,...
March 23, 2023 at 15:28
What was once a form of voter fraud became legal in many states right before an election, and it worked in the current president’s favor. “Democracy”,...
March 23, 2023 at 15:10
Sorry, repeating “democracy” isn’t going to work. They altered laws because it would have otherwise been illegal to do what they did. If Russian tweet...
March 23, 2023 at 14:57
No matter the explanation they’ve told you and therefor what you’ve come to believe, and no matter how many times you try to invoke “democracy”, alter...
March 23, 2023 at 14:43
Oh, it’s all “making it easier for voters to vote”. The censorship, altering state laws, social media censorship all makes sense now.
March 23, 2023 at 14:30
Altering state voting laws in the run-up to an election, getting social media to censor opponents, and threatening businesses with an army of astrotur...
March 23, 2023 at 14:23
It’s by their own admission.
March 23, 2023 at 14:01
You didn’t mention that Trump spoke with Abdul Ghani. That’s because the propaganda you dine on doesn’t tell you these things. The propaganda tells yo...
March 23, 2023 at 13:22
It was election interference on a mass scale. They had astroturf protesters ready to riot should Trump have won. After the riots of that year of cours...
March 23, 2023 at 13:17
Trump himself has vowed to beat the democrats at their own game, and ensured us his campaign will be ballot harvesting and pushing mail-in votes. I gu...
March 23, 2023 at 00:31