NOS4A2

Your nagging is unwanted, Frank. Grow a pair.

There was the claims of the accused, the access Hollywood tape, other accusers, and Trump’s deposition, none of which establish any rape or battery oc...

What evidence? There was no evidence of either rape or battery. But they went with one and not the other, for whatever reason.

He was talking about the publicist, whom he didn’t grope and kiss directly after his comments.

They disagreed with her rape accusation. So it’s clear they thought she was lying.

I’m quite aware he lost. But the fact remains there is no evidence of his supposed crimes.

It obviously did, which is nonsense because the access Hollywood tape occurred a decade later and was irrelevant.

It doesn’t mean partial, either.

I guess that’s why they went from rape to battery. It’s just more likely. Utterly bonkers justice system. But thanks for your expertise.

Yes, the sordid fears of a New York judge take precedence over an individual’s right to an impartial jury.

That seems to be why he lost, not because E. Jean Carrol established anything beyond a reasonable doubt.

Because it was Donald Trump.

So then why was it not allowed in this case?

Then why would they have voir dire in civil cases?

It would prove that the DNA wasn't Trump's, that it was some other person's DNA.

If you are a lawyer, Hanover, what is your opinion on anonymous juries and the 6th amendment?

As far as I know the judge didn't allow any of it, including the admission of Trump's DNA to compare to the male DNA found on the dress.

It's evidence she doesn't have a case and one of the reasons why we have statute of limitations. She neither remembers the date nor wrote about the ep...

Exactly.

You can prove it in court. The scars, the medical records, the witnesses. They’re probably all there. Supposing there is medical malpractice, would yo...

I think they were all in on it. None of them can remember the year it happened. The supposed episode never appears in E. Jean Carrol’s diary. None of ...

That’s because I know you cannot name one reason. You don’t have any reason.

Americans have the right to an impartial jury. That’s why during voir dire jurors are often questioned to decide whether they can be fair and impartia...

There is no evidence. Her claims of sexual assault can be discarded along with her accusations of rape. Believing such accusations without evidence sa...

I have no interest in the sexual lives of politicians. But yeah, the conversations between males can get quite sleazy.

Yeah, pretty funny.

Liable for damages in a civil suit about a decades-old incident in a year she can't even remember. Another feather in the cap, boys. https://youtu.be/...

Gender dysphoria is no act. I have no doubt it is painful and debilitating, and that those who deal with it deserve respect and compassion. The act is...

I support their freedoms. I just don't support the demand that I must conform to their beliefs and act as if it they were true. My mind is quite close...

My identity is under threat because I am expected to concede my own eyes, conscience, and language in order to play along with a state of affairs I kn...

I appreciate the arguments. I’m going to make my case anyways. We do worry about the future states of others, the burdens, the impositions. Life can b...

The only way to stop birth is abortion or death of the child, which is an imposition on the child.

Being pushed out of the womb? But if he isn’t pushed out of the womb, wouldn’t suffering and death occur?

Which act is the imposition, then?

We are knowingly bringing about a human being. For the most part the circumstances parents try hard to provide, often with great sacrifice and effort,...

That’s right. Trans identity is interesting because though it demands the recognition and protection and rights of its own identity, it begets the blu...

The issue is not that a man wants to dress as woman, but that he expects to be treated like one, spoken about as if he was one, and be given access to...

You’ve simply reasserted the claim that his argument was a retreat, so I tried to phrase it another way that might be understandable. If that itself i...

It seems more of a push than a retreat, is all I’m saying, like he was being bullied into being politically correct rather than correct.

They probably knew that the word “woman” is defined as “an adult female person”, which is about biological sex. The meaning is probably shifting these...

The second statement of A seems more of a response to the appeal to emotion of B and not necessarily a retreat of any sort. B is where the fallacy is....

It sounds like guesswork. I suppose we can confirm whether we were being ethical, whether we should or should not have had a child, by asking our offs...

The child has no say because it is not born. There is no child. So how can we behave ethically towards what amounts to a thought? In the same vein, wo...

It’s just difficult to believe that feeding, educating, clothing, housing, playing, and caring for someone for the better part of their life is a burd...

There is legitimate and illegitimate authority. Parents are a legitimate authority, meaning they can justify it, whereas political and government auth...

Sporting and play and exploration often have some burdens to them. I remember being taken rafting, hunting, sailing, surfing, hiking, fishing, all whi...

Though I would use different terms, and stress the difference, I think that’s a good assessment. In the case of Clinton, his adopting of deregulation ...

Here’s an article by a self-proclaimed neoliberal, the American Charles Peters, who wrote “The Neo-Liberal Mafnifesto” back in 1983. He also edited “N...

It seems more an ideology concerned with how to pull a people from of the successive failures of the centrally-planned and mercantilist past, the ruin...

Some trade in cryptocurrency, gold, or other contraband, I’m sure. Either way, government is not a necessary component to any space or system where go...