The end of May 2020. It’s when they burned down that famous church and defaced multiple monuments as they attacked the Whitehouse. The president had t...
The facts remain. Yes, rioters died. I said they didn’t kill anyone. The riot I was speaking about in particular was the assault on the whitehouse, an...
Crazy accusations in a new court motion. BREAKING: Filing alleges ‘improper’ relationship between Fulton DA, top Trump prosecutor Fani Willis hired al...
The conscious thing is that which we observe when it comes to consciousness. The phenomena we call consciousness is exactly identical, in fact one-and...
The thing or things we ascribe properties to can be observed. To observe the property “boiling point”, for example, we have to observe something boil....
I get it but properties are too abstract. They emerge only from thinking and discourse and various other analysis. What matters in the case of conscio...
Well said. The problem with emergentism is that nothing—and certainly no thing—can be shown to emerge. Nothing of any sort “appears” or “arises”, espe...
Jan 6th was the regime’s Reichstag fire. Bought and sold was the idea that we witnessed an insurrection, an attack, as if by a military force on Janua...
That’s not up to me, or the courts. That’s up to Congress, as only they have the power to enforce the provisions of the article. But given that the 14...
His fitness for president has already been proven. That lie was refuted every day he was in office. No, not a single person was hurt because of “Trump...
You’ve found me another reason why law in general and the legal profession in particular are stupid. Another reason why you should refrain from appeal...
But that’s what he said in the preceding sentences to the one you quoted. And yes, he wanted Congress to makes a stink about certification just as the...
For the last time, he never advocated anything of the sort. It’s why you won’t quote him advocating anything. What you can quote him advocating is peo...
It’s not true that he advocated any crime, whether they are the ones you mentioned or insurrection. It’s why you won’t quote any advocacy of any crime...
All you need to do to see if the speech is considered incitement is to apply the so-called “Brandenburg Test”. Is he advocating the use of lawless act...
A reasonable person could go to a transcript of his speech, pick out one of the twenty-odd times he uses the word “fight”, and show how he is being li...
It’s possible, sure, but entirely missing in this case. Not only does it not make sense to presume someone is guilty for a crime for which he has not ...
You would run away? Jesus. What a good citizen. No, given the proof the presumption of guilt is warranted. What you wouldn’t do, I hope, is presume so...
I can’t say I’ve heard this statement. Maybe a quote is in order. But, given that all statements are produced by physical beings, are etched or spoken...
The “fight like hell” canard is stupid because each time he uses the word in that speech he does so metaphorically. For some reason they take this one...
Then you heard him tell rally goers to peacefully and patriotically make their voices heard, something that was not cited in the Colorado decision as ...
I wonder where they learned that? The whole year previously there were riots everywhere, resulting in numerous deaths and billions in dollars in damag...
How does one know someone is guilty of a crime if he hasn’t been proven guilty, in your world? Did you see him do it? Is it a gut thing? Is it because...
But he hasn’t even been charged for insurrection, let alone convicted. You’re saying he’s guilty of a crime he hasn’t been charged with or proven guil...
It involves the evidence of offered by physics, surely, but also some other sciences as well. Given its relation to philosophy of mind, it’s also abou...
That’s a weird and messy way to understand it, in my opinion. Much of physics is theoretical and abstract. Not even physicists believe they’re true. T...
By punished I mean disqualified from the ballot. Do you think someone should be disqualified from the ballot for a crime he has not been proven to com...
Sorry for the confusion but a Supreme Court interprets the constitution and law. I made the moral case that it is wrong disqualify Trump, as is obviou...
The decision was wrong. Their evaluation is wrong. He was both acquitted of the charge in the impeachment process and was never charged, nor convicted...
I was trying to say he wasn’t liable for the same charges in the impeachment because he wasn’t convicted. The constitution explicitly said “ the Party...
I cannot follow. That someone has the right to do something does not entail that she is right to do it. It is immoral and unjust to punish someone for...
Comments