You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

NOS4A2

Comments

To be fair it is typical American political pandering. Kamala headquarters noticed they are failing with that demographic, historically so, so their p...
October 15, 2024 at 15:43
It means you’re a certain kind of animal, a great ape, and a member of the last extant species of man. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human
October 15, 2024 at 15:39
Kamala introduces racist policies, forgivable loans so long as you have a certain skin-color. Media silent. https://twitter.com/kamalaharris/status/18...
October 15, 2024 at 15:34
I'm curious if you'd take issue with hundreds of thousands of Europeans migrating to another continent en masse, perhaps entering countries illegally,...
October 15, 2024 at 15:29
She doesn’t need to buy their votes.
October 15, 2024 at 15:27
ABC fact checks the Kamala campaigns lies about Trump’s most recent town hall. https://twitter.com/collinrugg/status/1846179930490724807?s=46&t=IakyLv...
October 15, 2024 at 15:26
Kamala introduces racist policies, forgivable loans so long as you have a certain skin-color. Media silent. Edit: Sorry, wrong thread. https://twitter...
October 15, 2024 at 15:13
Not if it classifies a stage of human development. But when it’s posited as a different being, certainly.
October 11, 2024 at 04:34
But it is genetically distinct from the mother. If it’s not another, what is it? An organ? A parasite? A zygote is a very brief stage of development o...
October 11, 2024 at 03:50
I wasn’t aware that one needed to know and care if he was being treated morally. What facts are vague? I ask because we actually know a lot about zygo...
October 11, 2024 at 03:09
Every single one of you were zygotes. Luckily no one treated you with such disregard.
October 11, 2024 at 02:14
The only thing grey and ambiguous about it is the position. The vagueness of the terms used to describe it and the arbitrariness of the acceptable tim...
October 11, 2024 at 02:08
Yes, I’m using the language in the hope that you know what they mean. I’m not sharing with you meaning, or anything weird like that. If we could share...
October 10, 2024 at 19:35
As long as you understand that a human fetus would develop those complex cognitive functions—indeed was in the process of development—had you not kill...
October 10, 2024 at 19:07
There is nothing else with our genetic makeup. There is only one extant species of human beings.
October 10, 2024 at 18:35
None of the things I mentioned are genetically similar to human beings in any way.
October 10, 2024 at 18:30
"Shared meaning", "consciousness", "inter-subjectivity", "uniqueness", "sameness"—all of these words lack any referent in time and space, despite what...
October 10, 2024 at 18:28
Which non-human organisms with human DNA are you talking about?
October 10, 2024 at 18:06
Many things have human DNA, like sperm or a pool of saliva. Human beings have more than DNA.
October 10, 2024 at 17:07
I use the term "human being" in the sense that it is a member of species homo sapiens, whether it is developed or not. A fetus is not of some other sp...
October 10, 2024 at 16:45
Yes, it is always wrong to kill an innocent human being; that’s what such a principle entails. But contrary to your assumption, I wouldn’t think that ...
October 10, 2024 at 16:02
I don’t think anything should be outlawed.
October 10, 2024 at 15:10
It deprives her of life, a future, and the world of her presence. It devalues life, it inflicts unnecessary harm…but mostly it’s unjust. She innocent....
October 10, 2024 at 14:38
What if the mother wants the child. Does the zygote then deserve a chance at life and become worthy of protection, or is it still disposable? Yes, it ...
October 09, 2024 at 15:35
Now we’re on to something. What biological differences make it not wrong to kill an embryo, but wrong to kill a baby? I’ve already described my reason...
October 09, 2024 at 15:11
I would refrain as best as possible from positing phantom properties and folk biology. The baby was an embryo. No embryo, no baby, no human being. But...
October 09, 2024 at 15:00
Yes, it’s the woman’s choice. Let’s hope she makes the moral one.
October 09, 2024 at 14:54
Sometimes you have to show, not tell. I ask you to point to what you’re referring to and you point to a human being. I agree that’s a human being. If ...
October 09, 2024 at 14:51
I forget the context but I don’t think a country’s legal system has to make the decision.
October 09, 2024 at 14:24
I don’t understand why I need to point to a property of “wrongness”. I also never said someone needs to point to a measurable property of being a pers...
October 09, 2024 at 14:21
A lot of people do blame culture, certainly.
October 08, 2024 at 15:52
One cannot be against a culture or blame it for blameworthy acts because only individuals can perform blameworthy acts. One has to avoid holistic meth...
October 08, 2024 at 15:35
Sorry, I didn’t know this was an interview. You’re making nouns out of my adjectives. I don’t believe wrongness and rightness and rights are measurabl...
October 08, 2024 at 15:20
The beginning of a life is an arbitrary starting point?
October 08, 2024 at 15:09
There needs to be some basis for granting rights in the first place.
October 08, 2024 at 15:00
Sure, but parents and abortionists also make that distinction with or without the law.
October 08, 2024 at 14:44
Anyone can confer a right. And I was just explaining my view of rights, like you asked. I’m sorry but there is hardly any consensus as to what a perso...
October 08, 2024 at 14:34
Those are rights. It is a bill of rights. A deceleration of human rights is a declaration of rights, without which there are no rights. It is up to th...
October 07, 2024 at 17:16
Fetuses do not exist in a void. Fetuses can be interacted with. If they couldn't, they wouldn't be killed.
October 07, 2024 at 16:10
That’s one of their manifestations, sure. Grab any bill of rights and point to a right, you’ll have your answer in what it consists of. If there is mo...
October 07, 2024 at 15:45
Maybe that’s it. Maybe “person” is a doing rather than a thing. The having of feelings, thoughts, memories etc. are doings, after all. Humans person. ...
October 07, 2024 at 14:27
I understand, and have no problem with either term in common usage, but if I were to ask you to point to whatever it is you're referring to you would ...
October 06, 2024 at 18:26
I can't see it from your position because there is no evidence for it. It cannot be shown that personhood or soul or "I" enter or leave the body at an...
October 06, 2024 at 17:23
Yes, it is still you even with damage to the head.
October 06, 2024 at 16:38
A relevant change would be a hole in your head and damage to very important parts of your body. It's much different than a broken arm in that it's a d...
October 06, 2024 at 16:33
Yeah, that was you the whole time, the biology. It's all you are. It's all you will be.
October 06, 2024 at 16:21
It all seems very arbitrary. It’s not unlike the soul concept. You could ask your mother. You could watch any human birth. Look at sonograms and infer...
October 06, 2024 at 15:56
Are those who do not respond not persons? Are persons and subjects living human beings or are they not? Point proven. I’ll put you down as the first p...
October 06, 2024 at 00:45
I don’t know what an “actual person” is. What I do know is that a human being forms, and that morality ought to concern human beings. Biology and anth...
October 05, 2024 at 21:58
It refers to the earliest stages of every human being that ever existed. There is no biological evidence that a soul or “actual person” forms at any p...
October 05, 2024 at 21:12