NOS4A2

So much for facts.

Because your claims are unconvincing.

Then where in the transcript did he condition security assistance or a meeting on anything? Testimony from the only people who spoke to Trump proves t...

Many facts were presented. Do you dispute any of them?

When you want to try mustering you’re own thoughts on the arguments presented I’ll be here.

Then let me know when you do and we could discuss it. Until then...

You should watch the entirety of the arguments. But you admitted you haven’t.

Unfortunately that “fact check” completely mischaracterized Philbin’s argument and left most if it out.

Did you not watch the defense’s case?

Well, after the Whitehouse counsel’s dismantling of the House’s case, let’s watch the spin shall we?

I’m retired. Money is already earned, friend. Unfortunately that’s something they won’t teach you in certain circles. :wink:

Have you read the Horowitz report? Wikipedia: Horowitz Report Wikipedia Horowitz Report Wikipedia Horowitz Report Your bolds are fake news—lies—becaus...

It’s not analogous, is what’s wrong with it.

When you step out of your madness I’ll be here for you.

Say what you want. I’ll still be here defending you from the snakes, even if you lay with them.

Kompromat is Russian for compromising material, and in this case it contained nude photos. He wanted it to go not only to the FBI, but also the intel ...

That’s the convenience of coming into an argument late or otherwise sniping from the sidelines: you can ask questions that were already asked and answ...

The problem begins when one identifies with this “thinker” and nothing else. Doing so one has no choice to believe in solipsism as a logical conclusio...

I have never said anywhere nor even implied that Schiff’s hypocrisy makes his arguments regarding Trump false or flawed, not have I ever used Schiff’s...

It’s not exculpatory. All I’m saying is Schiff engaged in the activities he accuses of others.

That's the argument. But no evidence points to any mens rea. Given that no public statement of that nature occurred, that no investigations against po...

I merely showed that Schiff sought Russian political dirt on his opponent. I did so after spending countless pages addressing the case and refuting Sc...

You look it up. I have not charged you with hypocrisy to discredit your position. Another lie.

I never said that. Another lie. Trump never did what Schiff did.

That’s whataboutism, a logical fallacy. Schiff is the prosecution and he is lying in order to impeach a president. He lied to Congress with his “parod...

It’s not whataboutism to point out Schiff’s hypocrisy.

https://youtu.be/XcVB6Fjo26w

I don’t care. Here’s Schiff being duped by Ukrainians into wanting nude pictures of Trump—political dirt. https://youtu.be/NxHrn6Byz3g

Let me know when you can muster your own thought. I don’t watch Fox News; you do.

“Proving the double standard about withholding aid...is the easy part.” His question begging, for one. His lie that his committee had no contact with ...

Here you go, padding your thought with the thought of someone else’s, like a good parrot. And cherry picking too.

I’m not sure how sophistry can have hysteria.

Proving the double standard about withholding aid and stonewalling congress is the easy part. There is video of everyone, both republican and Democrat...

That phrase only means that no other entity but the house has the power to impeach, not that the constitution no longer applies to congress. It does n...

Yes the power of impeachment extends to the full house, not any one individual house member or committee. Therefore any subpoena issued before the hou...

Another full day of Democrat sophistry lined up. Note the assumption of guilt and question begging in all of it. Trump’s “corrupt scheme”, he “corrupt...

Give us another CNN and Vox link.

It’s doomed because the case is wholly inadequate, without evidence, and mostly fabricated by those who know they cannot win in the next election.

The constitution grants the House full power of impeachment, not just select individuals and committees. That’s why the demands for documents were dee...

I presented the relevant facts and you evaded them, even now. I’m easily refuting you’re misinformation as we speak. So touchy, probably because even ...

Meanwhile your coveted deep-state, the DNC, and the media will receive the two-tiered justice they always have, and life will go on.

“ However, Mueller did not allege any crimes directly connecting the two — that is, that Trump advisers criminally conspired with Russian officials to...

What if the impeachment inquiry was unfair and unjust, violating due process and the constitution?

"Mueller ultimately didn’t accuse the president of obstruction of justice, he wrote that he couldn’t rule out the possibility and declare that the pre...

Thanks for the insight, Don. Very astute.

"Someone's been hitting the Hannity a little too hard." - Don Lemon

Do you believe that every president that evokes executive privilege against congressional demands—Obama, Bush, Clinton, Bush Sr., Reagan, Carter, Ford...

If it’s misinformation it should be easy to refute. Oddly enough, any valid response to my arguments and/or accurate information is missing in your re...

No one said otherwise.

I like your nuanced take on it here. Well said.