NOS4A2

It certainly isn’t about the injustice of George Floyd’s murder anymore. They gunned down an officer in Oakland, not because he had anything to do wit...

https://twitter.com/realDonaldTrump/status/1267129644228247552?s=20 I’m not aware of any evidence of Antifa agitators, but Barr’s recent statements an...

You are right. I was wrong. Yes, Kislyak mentions them. Flynn does not. Flynn certainly does not “ask the Government of Russia's Ambassador to the Uni...

https://www.justice.gov/file/1015026/download The charging document made clear this is what he lied about. Yet in the transcript he does not ask the R...

I did read it, but I also read what you suspiciously left out of it. Clearly he's still talking about the expelling of diplomats. No where in that quo...

Clearly they don’t. Why fret about flesh and blood human beings when you can making sweeping generalizations? That’s why human beings are often the br...

In contradiction to the charging documents, it is true that “On or about December 29, 2016, FLYNN did not ask the Government of Russia’s Ambassador to...

Even if I do agree with you (I don’t; we’re talking about putting people in jail for making false statements, so precision is important), did he in fa...

He either asked Kislyak to refrain from escalating or he didn’t. He in fact did not. It takes some mental gymnastics to say he did. Here’s the chargin...

There are some contradictions in the Mueller charging documents. As the transcripts show, Flynn in fact did not ask the Russian ambassador to “refrain...

Lol. Sometimes you can come up with some gems. :ok:

I think it’s boring. I can’t even be bothered to read them, let alone respond.

Yeah I've abandoned that spectrum myself. I just don't find affinity with abstract groups and communities in general, probably the logical result of m...

I still consider myself a man of the left, just not their version of it.

Truth shines in a free and open encounter with falsehood.

I like debate, no matter how contentious. It’s good for you.

I will abide, even when the rules are selectively applied.

I apologize for what I said, Benkei. I know you meant no ill will. That stuff just bothers me.

I don’t view the world through the lens of race, and I despise people who pigeon-hole others into such groups and then pretend they can derive from it...

I'm not sure that would happen. Perhaps a real example would suffice.

It applies to sick people only, not "non-whites" or any other group of people. Perhaps you might refrain from holding low expectations of entire group...

You left his part out, shill.

The white man has spoken. Non-whites should not go to polling stations.

What a lie. Any other advice you have for non-whites?

You don’t think non-whites can line up and vote like everyone else? Fucking sick.

It’s a poor phrase used to illustrate an old standard which was used to censor opposition to the draft.

The standard in first amendment law is “immanent lawless action”, or in other words, the advocacy of criminal activity, if and only when the advocacy ...

I think the term “functional equivalent” means it is not actually public property, but functions in a similar manner. Recall when the courts claimed T...

I was worried that Trump would attempt to regulate Twitter, but the EO seems to be consistent with law without getting all authoritarian. 1. To order ...

Maybe that’s the key to it: do what you can instead of washing your hands of the situation and walking away. Warn the conductor, call the police, make...

I think it’s a step too far. But the question of who fact-checks the fact-checkers is an important one. The capricious and political use of their labe...

All that being said, it is wrong for Trump to try to regulate social media companies, and I suspect his EO will be slapped down in the supreme court. ...

My mistake. Another example is that video. There is nothing manipulated in it.

It's the first time it happened!!

Apparently it does, because Twitter didn't simply "say it was false", as if they made a statement. They altered the code of the website in a discrimin...

Of course not. You guys are all adults, aren't you?

Utterly false. If only I had the power to add a little link to fox news under your misinformation.

That explains everything.

You'd be fine if someone did that to you?

I do not want to limit their expressions nor dictate how they run their website, and instead of assuming what I want you might as well just ask me. No...

That’s absurd. That’s like saying the first amendment protects itself.

I do not.

Was there a point in there somewhere?

Is this another little game of questions?

You have my blessing.

Of course they should. It’s their property. They can do what they want. That doesn’t mean it’s right or wrong. Are you able to make that distinction?

Again, I never said Twitter’s new feature is illegal or not protected by the first amendment, so it’s stupid to keep trying to nail down that irreleva...

It’s not a comment. It’s a new feature of the system, one designed to combat “misinformation”, which has been demanded by Western governments for the ...

It’s a twitter comment. The doublespeak is profound.

If it’s a comment then who made it?