You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Thorongil

Comments

I'm not either. He seems to think that any argument that accounts for horrors in general accounts necessarily for any specific horrors, no matter how ...
August 11, 2017 at 13:02
>:O Define soul.
August 11, 2017 at 01:17
What do you mean by logical consistency? The principle of non-contradiction? You think God is the principle of non-contradiction? That is incoherent.
August 09, 2017 at 00:13
I don't understand your reply, but that might be because I'm mostly ignorant of formal logic. I will simply reiterate that to say that God is a necess...
August 08, 2017 at 23:54
https://media.giphy.com/media/7hvkctkRc3Q6Q/giphy.gif
August 08, 2017 at 22:24
Thomas won't take this betrayal lying down, sucka: https://media.giphy.com/media/oq0nnik1AjB3G/giphy.gif
August 08, 2017 at 22:11
I liked Thomas the Tank Engine better.
August 08, 2017 at 18:46
How is this not making the same contradictory point but with different vocabulary? How is "affect without input" different from "force without consent...
August 08, 2017 at 18:39
I don't think that's what he's doing, though. I've struggled with this too, but I think the claim is that if God exists, then he exists necessarily (c...
August 08, 2017 at 17:48
You don't know this, though. You seem to be taking certain physicists' word for it, who tend to be ignorant of philosophy, that time began with the Bi...
August 08, 2017 at 12:10
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cq-yTY7XYAQN-5x.jpg
August 08, 2017 at 02:47
What if I told you it bothers me?
August 08, 2017 at 02:07
Maybe this is a slam poetry contest in disguise.
August 08, 2017 at 02:06
Off topic, but why the hell do you always have several lines worth of space before you begin your comment? Is that part of the wisdom of pomo or somet...
August 07, 2017 at 20:43
I see. I should've known. This little trick was used by the Church Fathers. It's rather irritating in its unfalsifiability, but I guess I must grant i...
August 07, 2017 at 20:03
Ah, shoot. I read a "not" that wasn't there. To be honest, I was expecting you to answer that Mithras does not exist. That you think he does is even m...
August 07, 2017 at 19:53
Okay. Then you mean "no." :-| So why is your God real but Mithras not? If you answer that you have in some way experienced God, then what distinguishe...
August 07, 2017 at 19:46
This is false. A fetus, by definition, attempts to live and grow unless impeded from doing so by external factors. The crying is concomitant with tryi...
August 07, 2017 at 19:40
"It?" Does the being signified by the name Mithras exist?
August 07, 2017 at 18:12
You exist at the moment of conception. You're apparently trying to say that you don't exist until you're born, which is absurd.
August 07, 2017 at 18:10
Does Mithras exist or is he a figment of Roman soldiers' imaginations?
August 07, 2017 at 17:18
This thread seems pretentious.
August 07, 2017 at 17:09
I'm not saying it isn't true. I'm saying that it doesn't say what anti-natalists want it to say and/or imply. Yes it does.
August 07, 2017 at 17:06
It's only true in the trivial sense that you didn't exist prior to being born, which is in fact a mere tautology, but not in the sense that you were f...
August 07, 2017 at 16:37
All you have established is that, at minimum and with no other considerations, this is what life's purpose is. It could be that life has some other pu...
August 07, 2017 at 16:27
"Thrown" has implicit normative connotation. It implies that someone who already exists is forced to do something without their consent. But as I argu...
August 07, 2017 at 16:09
This appears to be your answer to why instrumentality is a problem. The problem with it is that, instead of merely acknowledging the fact that human b...
August 07, 2017 at 03:22
And I disputed this claim you have quoted. What are you talking about? I answered the question you asked in this quote. Then you presuppose the mainte...
August 07, 2017 at 01:52
But they have. It is implicitly agreed upon so long as one upholds the law and desires its just emendation, respects the rights of others, and looks t...
August 07, 2017 at 00:03
But even granting the truth of this claim, which I am not entirely convinced of, the absence of a need to produce need does not, in itself, constitute...
August 06, 2017 at 20:06
Outside of the obvious biological answer to your question, the most cogent that I have found, though not quite fully assented to, is that we have a du...
August 06, 2017 at 19:31
And if you keep this act up, I predict no one will be reading yours, since you'll be banned.
August 05, 2017 at 20:02
You're repeating the same false accusations here. No, I'm not. Reading comprehension is not your strong suit it seems. Once again, repeating this does...
August 05, 2017 at 19:53
Wow. This is so ridiculous that I'm not entirely sure you're being serious! First, no, I'm not in favor of child labor or racial discrimination. For y...
August 05, 2017 at 19:35
You're trying to make marginal cases the normative ones. Sorry, these are red herrings. I'd like an answer to my question without offensive insinuatio...
August 05, 2017 at 19:27
So, back when we didn't pump billions into education, didn't have a department of education, etc, US students were receiving an inferior education to ...
August 05, 2017 at 18:32
You might want to look up Einstein's definition of insanity.
August 05, 2017 at 18:23
Then you face the empirical problem of how the ever increasing billions spent on education hasn't translated into students being better educated.
August 05, 2017 at 15:30
Vague. Vague. Ah, money and property. Vague. Vague. Vague. Which will cost money. From whom? What do we cut from the budget to do this? Why would this...
August 05, 2017 at 03:55
I'm less well read of Nietzsche, but from my limited knowledge of him, I'd say I agree. The early Nietzsche is the most interesting, in my opinion, be...
August 04, 2017 at 22:49
The Agu/Beebert battle commences once again. >:O
August 04, 2017 at 22:27
What is the purpose of reproducing? From a biological perspective, it's to create more human beings. Obviously. But let's cut to the chase: What you r...
August 04, 2017 at 16:08
Ah, so "you" really means "most people." I find complaining about what cannot be changed to be rather tiresome. Condemning the masses for their ignora...
August 04, 2017 at 16:01
Right, but the unstated punch line is that you and the OP cast normative judgment on the hedonic treadmill just described. You think it's a bad thing ...
August 04, 2017 at 03:48
Or perhaps for reasons other than these. Why do you insist on being a mind reader here? And surely you're open to a tu quoque reply: "If you're trying...
August 04, 2017 at 03:21
No, your brain pumps chemicals into your body. Minds pumping any kind of physical matter is incoherent. This is demonstrably false. There are probably...
August 04, 2017 at 03:15
Hmm?
August 01, 2017 at 19:34
Yes, too often people assume that pleasure is the highest good, as apparently the OP did, and so are really hedonists or sensualists, whether they rea...
July 31, 2017 at 20:50
This depends on what you mean by these terms. What is the pleasure in question? There are some pleasures I don't want to experience, such as those fou...
July 31, 2017 at 19:35