You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Pantagruel

Comments

I always found abstraction itself to be somewhat mystical.
May 07, 2020 at 21:45
This seems a valid observation.
May 07, 2020 at 17:39
We know that we are talking about the same thing when we achieve consensus. Then our communications are co-ordinated. I fully admit, this is an inters...
May 07, 2020 at 16:34
1. It is a fact that we are communicating now. 2. Because I have presented this fact, it is (trivially) my opinion that this is a fact. 3. You can dis...
May 07, 2020 at 16:08
:lol:
May 07, 2020 at 12:44
I didn't say that. I said our own opinion about whatever it is we are talking about. You have missed the nuance of the statement.
May 07, 2020 at 12:27
Absolutely! But that is not necessarily a point in their favour. Just because something is great, doesn't mean it couldn't have been better.
May 07, 2020 at 11:53
Yeah, it was tongue in cheek.
May 07, 2020 at 11:51
I don't necessarily endorse the implied ad hominen here, but I do concur that this mnemonic falls more in the way of an heuristic than a principle. I ...
May 07, 2020 at 10:41
The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol 1: Reason & the Rationalization of Society The Theory of Communicative Action, Vol 2: Lifeworld & System: A Cr...
May 07, 2020 at 09:57
I was just endorsing your previous conversation, I came to the same conclusion on this thread a few days ago.
May 06, 2020 at 18:55
:up:
May 06, 2020 at 18:27
I believe I already addressed your concerns about the relationship between the subjective and the objective, per above. I didn't pretend to solve it, ...
May 06, 2020 at 15:47
Quite. That is one of the core questions of epistemology isn't it? We are constantly fighting a battle to find a universally valid methodology for ste...
May 06, 2020 at 15:35
I have the citation somewhere, but I think it was von Bertalanffy who said that what justifies any metaphysical theory is ultimately its elegance.....
May 06, 2020 at 15:13
That seems to me to be a bit of a non-starter. Everyone is always talking about their own opinion of whatever it is they are talking about. You can pu...
May 06, 2020 at 14:00
Because expressing an opinion about mysticism was the subject of the thread. Non-linear dynamics is not illogical, it represents a different form of l...
May 06, 2020 at 13:41
I would agree precisely. "Mysticism" is no less a valid experimental or theoretical domain than any other. It is just a question of the nature of its ...
May 06, 2020 at 12:29
I think this is a difference of degree, and not of kind. Mystical experiences are not impervious to communication (I don't limit myself to language he...
May 06, 2020 at 11:48
I have been what I would classify as a seeker from a very early age. I considered entering a Zen monastery when I was 25, visited and did the intake i...
May 06, 2020 at 09:59
Do you believe that when Pythagoras first grasped the relationship between the squares on the sides of a right-angled triangle it popped into his head...
May 06, 2020 at 09:52
Any mid-level and up IT person can probably work from home (I can with no loss of productivity). Pretty sure that none of those are bullshit jobs. Cur...
May 05, 2020 at 19:42
I think the question being bruited is, is this a material value, or a social value?
May 05, 2020 at 15:45
Well, if understanding represents something in addition to what is explicitly presented in a proposition, then by definition it is "beyond words." So ...
May 05, 2020 at 15:23
Uh-huh. So you would tend to agree that the "practical value for society" is a good criterion of productivity? I was more re-affirming your question t...
May 05, 2020 at 14:51
Exactly. Marx differentiates "productive labour" from "socially necessary labour," and considers average socially necessary labour to be the aggregate...
May 05, 2020 at 14:28
Yes, mysticism is one of those "proof is in the pudding" things. My perspective is that the primary results are personal, and that that personal growt...
May 05, 2020 at 13:48
Nicely put.
May 04, 2020 at 19:01
I guess it's just your style. I never held with the "conceal to reveal" philosophy of writing. Say it plainly or don't bother is my preference.
May 04, 2020 at 18:57
This all seems rather unenlightened indeed. And there is lots of viable material even in the wiki-drivel. Seeking "by contemplation and self-surrender...
May 04, 2020 at 18:29
Psychedelics are not for entertainment. Maybe if you are only interested in getting as far out of your own head as possible without any concern for th...
May 04, 2020 at 17:56
Mysticism to some extent involves the concept of freeing oneself from the constraints of the mundane (viz the whole monastic tradition is a separation...
May 04, 2020 at 16:17
Any effort to translate from the sphere of institutionalized practices (e.g. Buddhist meditation) to uniquely personal experience (which mysticism is ...
May 04, 2020 at 14:51
Thanks for clearing that up! :)
May 01, 2020 at 22:23
Perhaps like saying, "I would say this, even if you put a gun to my head"? Some contexts dictate results in ways we might not anticipate.
May 01, 2020 at 18:53
Do you think the quality of criticism offered by someone who has, in turn, offered their own work for criticism is the same as someone who is critiqui...
May 01, 2020 at 17:41
Yes, that is the essence of criticizability in general. It's what makes rationality possible! Edit: I think it isn't clear that pleasure is the only o...
May 01, 2020 at 15:04
So an exercise in philosophical rhetoric, basically? Contribute if you want to critique?
May 01, 2020 at 13:51
LOL! I presume you just read why in the other thread and this is banter.
May 01, 2020 at 13:39
Because it is specifically an example of the fallacy of division? Johnny loves his car. Johnny mostly loves the engine of his car. But without the car...
May 01, 2020 at 13:30
There are certain specific themes and directions of thought that I find most interesting. I like to compare my perspectives with those of others. I'm ...
May 01, 2020 at 13:25
I have a pretty heavy reading list already, but I'm definitely interested in tagging along on this. I just may not participate in every discussion.
May 01, 2020 at 12:45
This seems to me a spurious regress. While you can always analytically decompose any thing or event, this does not remove or divert the value or exper...
May 01, 2020 at 12:22
I'll be honest, I have no idea how to interpret your proposition in that case.
April 30, 2020 at 21:47
It seems that you are using "creationism" as a kind of anchoring symbol or paradigm of an "ultimate metaphysical value". This is exactly what Talcott ...
April 30, 2020 at 17:46
Creationist logic is only valid within a communicative framework of rationality.
April 30, 2020 at 17:24
I don't deny that creationism exists as a sociological fact (although I do think that is over-narrowly construing the scope of sacred meaning). That d...
April 30, 2020 at 16:12
I think the ultimate authority must affect us not at a proscriptive but at a prescriptive-motivational level.
April 30, 2020 at 15:17
I am thinking that the mind's intuition of its own existence corresponds with and is the synthetic integration of the total set of ts functional conne...
April 30, 2020 at 13:11