You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

bongo fury

Comments

No, but I think when people are inspired to declare that a single grain is absolutely not a heap, they mean it is a safe distance outside the range of...
July 07, 2019 at 18:15
Which will be all the time, then, because our usage of heap quite clearly appeals to numerical comparisons to decide cases, and withholds the term fro...
July 07, 2019 at 17:41
Except that you do want your conversation/discourse to withstand the pressure of logical clarification. The puzzle suggests that any clarification ren...
July 07, 2019 at 09:39
Not sure about that. If it at least means we agree that vague words are useful in all their vagueness, then cool. But does your conception of vaguenes...
July 06, 2019 at 19:40
And very often (any slippery slope ethical dilemma, any artistic play with discrete perceptual categories, e.g. musical pitches), you want to work wit...
July 06, 2019 at 18:57
But otherwise, we can use it as it is. With certain embarrassing difficulties on slippery slopes, admittedly.
July 06, 2019 at 18:36
Which, when you want to know about usage, is what you want to know. And, otherwise of course, not. But I am interested in usage, so I am.
July 06, 2019 at 18:34
Any "slippery slope" issue. ... is where, at any rate, 'a heap of sand' has seemed a pertinent analogy.
July 06, 2019 at 16:15
By "threshold" I hoped to refer to what you were calling a "private definition of heap". E.g., GMBA's 4-grains-or-more. From their observations about ...
July 06, 2019 at 13:37
But what about the big picture, a poll of judgements, or of individual thresholds? What if the tail end of such a distribution (of thresholds) reaches...
July 06, 2019 at 10:48