Okay, that's enough. Life's too short for me to spend much time talking to a sexist jerk >:O >:O I flagged your comment for sexism, btw. The moderator...
Yes of course they will, IF THEY ARE SEXIST. But I don't think you understand what that means. You'll most likely flag my comments about the Orthodox ...
If you cannot produce the evidence that I am a sexist, do you agree to receive a warning from the moderators for slander? After all, this is exactly w...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6O5zgXeCynQ You are such a liar, you should be ashamed of yourself. Of course nothing happened, cause none of them wer...
Well, to begin with, it tells us that Christianity (or Judaism) for that matter is likely to be speaking the truth, since we notice from experience th...
"Teacher, teacher the dog really ate my homework! I know I don't have any other evidence, but it was 19:31 and he actually ate it! I don't have more i...
What's the international conference? And how are they "Christian" scholars if they claim the Bible misquotes Jesus? And how the hell did they establis...
Look at this for example. Strawman. Have you actually read the man? I read Pascal's Pensées, and it's nothing of this sort at all. Pascal was writing ...
I never disagreed with your point, I just disagreed with the one-sided interpretation you were initially giving of Jesus. However, I will say that in ...
You're wrong here. I do not reject the Law, all I do is diminish its sphere of application to creation, not Creator. Good isn't evil and evil isn't go...
That's not from the TTC. Sounds more like a commentary - unless you're using a very weird and commented translation. Warmed over Hume. I prefer Aristo...
Authoritarianism is different than authority. Authority has a rational basis for its enforcement, whereas authoritarianism undermines its own authorit...
I don't know what experience he had. Why not? God is His own standard. How can God be judged by the Law? Well I'm tempted to say I would have done the...
Well that's certainly one side of Christ. The other side of Christ is taking the whip and chasing the money-lenders out of the temple. :s why is it po...
You are right. It is. They have no independent existence, therefore they cannot be defined in-themselves. But then neither can they be defined in term...
Well, sorry, I didn't mean to be condescending, I just honestly said what you answer sounded like to me... Yes but notice that again this isn't what I...
The question is self-refuting (incoherent) because in asking the question you presuppose that the uncaused thing has a cause, and therefore it is not ...
The question of why is incoherent though. Why always refers to an external reason for something, a cause of its existence. But God is by definition Un...
No, for He is beyond Being and Non-Being. Being beyond both, He cannot fall under either. If you want it, God exists more real-ly than Being, for He i...
The fact God is transcendent would imply that He both exists and doesn't exist at one and the same time. Or better said, God is beyond Being and Non-B...
Personally I find Spinoza's ontological argument for Substance valid if we were to transfer it to God. But what do you think of this Catholic theologi...
Well again, as I said before, human beings will be judged by the Law, and are in fact bound by the Law. So if they do evil, then they are to be judged...
Comments