You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Agustino

Comments

In: Sexism  — view comment
You have to admit that Mr. Harris is a little bit like a toy. You press the button, and there he goes! >:O
August 14, 2017 at 22:16
In: Sexism  — view comment
>:)
August 14, 2017 at 22:15
In: Sexism  — view comment
Okay, that's enough. Life's too short for me to spend much time talking to a sexist jerk >:O >:O I flagged your comment for sexism, btw. The moderator...
August 14, 2017 at 22:08
Apparently "everyone" thinks I'm a sexist: >:O
August 14, 2017 at 22:07
Yes, he hides under his bed from them >:O
August 14, 2017 at 22:07
In: Sexism  — view comment
Yes of course they will, IF THEY ARE SEXIST. But I don't think you understand what that means. You'll most likely flag my comments about the Orthodox ...
August 14, 2017 at 22:04
In: Sexism  — view comment
If you cannot produce the evidence that I am a sexist, do you agree to receive a warning from the moderators for slander? After all, this is exactly w...
August 14, 2017 at 21:58
In: Sexism  — view comment
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6O5zgXeCynQ You are such a liar, you should be ashamed of yourself. Of course nothing happened, cause none of them wer...
August 14, 2017 at 21:52
Well, to begin with, it tells us that Christianity (or Judaism) for that matter is likely to be speaking the truth, since we notice from experience th...
August 14, 2017 at 20:12
"Teacher, teacher the dog really ate my homework! I know I don't have any other evidence, but it was 19:31 and he actually ate it! I don't have more i...
August 14, 2017 at 20:11
Pink pony >:)
August 14, 2017 at 20:04
Yes.
August 14, 2017 at 18:55
What's the international conference? And how are they "Christian" scholars if they claim the Bible misquotes Jesus? And how the hell did they establis...
August 14, 2017 at 18:51
Scaramucci says that Mike Pence may replace Trump as POTUS! I'd be very happy! :D
August 14, 2017 at 18:49
:s
August 14, 2017 at 18:43
Look at this for example. Strawman. Have you actually read the man? I read Pascal's Pensées, and it's nothing of this sort at all. Pascal was writing ...
August 14, 2017 at 18:31
Yes, it was a hilarious strawman with a small grain of truth :P
August 14, 2017 at 18:15
Have you ever read Aristotelian criticisms of Stoicism?
August 14, 2017 at 17:00
You forget:
August 14, 2017 at 16:59
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eXuL-WPme20
August 14, 2017 at 10:27
Now I understand why geography is the only subject I ever failed in school >:O
August 14, 2017 at 08:41
I never disagreed with your point, I just disagreed with the one-sided interpretation you were initially giving of Jesus. However, I will say that in ...
August 14, 2017 at 08:40
You're wrong here. I do not reject the Law, all I do is diminish its sphere of application to creation, not Creator. Good isn't evil and evil isn't go...
August 14, 2017 at 08:30
That's an interpretation of it, not the actual text. The actual text never says that, ALTHOUGH, it is true that the TTC does say that: §36
August 13, 2017 at 18:44
That's not from the TTC. Sounds more like a commentary - unless you're using a very weird and commented translation. Warmed over Hume. I prefer Aristo...
August 13, 2017 at 18:40
Have you not read Revelation?
August 13, 2017 at 11:05
Authoritarianism is different than authority. Authority has a rational basis for its enforcement, whereas authoritarianism undermines its own authorit...
August 13, 2017 at 11:01
I don't know what experience he had. Why not? God is His own standard. How can God be judged by the Law? Well I'm tempted to say I would have done the...
August 13, 2017 at 11:00
Well that's certainly one side of Christ. The other side of Christ is taking the whip and chasing the money-lenders out of the temple. :s why is it po...
August 13, 2017 at 10:50
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RAhxpUTWwiA Do you think Trump will attack if Kim Jong Un threatens again?
August 13, 2017 at 08:41
You are right. It is. They have no independent existence, therefore they cannot be defined in-themselves. But then neither can they be defined in term...
August 13, 2017 at 08:35
That's legal, this thread is meant to be for invasion :P - other threads are off-limit, but this one you can do pretty much anything in!
August 12, 2017 at 21:27
Behold, he is coming: https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/5a/d0/8d/5ad08d7ec95f9a564c3f31a7b3bf16c1.jpg
August 12, 2017 at 21:25
Then he wanted to take us out for a bagel :-O >:O
August 12, 2017 at 21:22
Yes, that's how he actually killed Emptyheady the bunny :-O
August 12, 2017 at 21:15
You might at some point haha lol :P - if you get a Baden chasing after you with his rifle haha >:O
August 12, 2017 at 21:05
Well, sorry, I didn't mean to be condescending, I just honestly said what you answer sounded like to me... Yes but notice that again this isn't what I...
August 12, 2017 at 21:04
Haha :P lonely wolves (underdogs as Noble Dust calls them) must rescue each other no? >:O
August 12, 2017 at 21:02
Will you fight Baden with me? :’( He wants to exterminate me for my politically incorrect right wing views ...
August 12, 2017 at 19:57
Oh dear, how come? >:O
August 12, 2017 at 19:56
>:O
August 12, 2017 at 19:43
Of course, because it is fundamentally ungraspable, it is beyond logic and the intellect.
August 12, 2017 at 19:42
The question is self-refuting (incoherent) because in asking the question you presuppose that the uncaused thing has a cause, and therefore it is not ...
August 12, 2017 at 19:40
8-)
August 12, 2017 at 19:38
The question of why is incoherent though. Why always refers to an external reason for something, a cause of its existence. But God is by definition Un...
August 12, 2017 at 19:34
No, for He is beyond Being and Non-Being. Being beyond both, He cannot fall under either. If you want it, God exists more real-ly than Being, for He i...
August 12, 2017 at 19:30
The fact God is transcendent would imply that He both exists and doesn't exist at one and the same time. Or better said, God is beyond Being and Non-B...
August 12, 2017 at 19:26
Personally I find Spinoza's ontological argument for Substance valid if we were to transfer it to God. But what do you think of this Catholic theologi...
August 12, 2017 at 19:24
Yes >:) - He'd say "why not?!". (just joking LOL >:O )
August 12, 2017 at 19:21
Well again, as I said before, human beings will be judged by the Law, and are in fact bound by the Law. So if they do evil, then they are to be judged...
August 12, 2017 at 19:20