You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Agustino

Comments

Diderot!
September 06, 2017 at 20:33
Does this decentralized system involve any bureaucratic state apparatus which would dictate who produces what and in what quantities? I think that wou...
September 06, 2017 at 20:32
By making every immoral act illegal.
September 06, 2017 at 20:17
Well I think it's wrong to say chaos cannot do anything, that's precisely my problem in fact. I view chaos as something that DOES something, but does ...
September 06, 2017 at 20:11
Good! Most excellent!
September 06, 2017 at 20:07
Who said this?
September 06, 2017 at 20:06
LOL - I was being quite serious. You yourself mentioned how corrupt the state is - and that a lot of money is made in making business with the state.
September 06, 2017 at 20:00
Well potency cannot actualize itself - infinite potency (in the absence of act) is just infinite nothing - it doesn't do anything, it cannot do anythi...
September 06, 2017 at 19:54
Sure. So the fact it is a vice/sin (immoral) isn't a sufficient ground for us to outlaw it. So how do we choose what we outlaw and what we don't? We'l...
September 06, 2017 at 19:49
Why would you say chaos is unlimited potency? Afterall, potency without act is nothing. I would characterise chaos as lacking in pattern/predictabilit...
September 06, 2017 at 19:38
In: Best?  — view comment
You need a lot of luck, otherwise known as the mandate of Heaven. With that, nothing can stop you, and without it, you don't stand a chance.
September 06, 2017 at 19:35
Not totally unrelated to morality. But for example, gluttony is a vice/sin, and yet we don't outlaw gluttony. So the fact it is a vice/sin isn't suffi...
September 06, 2017 at 19:31
Meaning that just because an activity is immoral is not a sufficient condition to have a law against it. Other conditions need to be met as well.
September 06, 2017 at 19:19
Personally? Probably against, because I don't think gambling is a good thing. But we shouldn't legislate morality.
September 06, 2017 at 19:07
To me, it seems that you're the person who wants to destroy Sauron using the One Ring. You'll become just as bad as he was. I'd rather destroy central...
September 06, 2017 at 19:06
It depends what you mean by capitalist. Does someone like me count as a capitalist? I think entrepreneurship is vital for the economy, perhaps the mos...
September 06, 2017 at 18:55
I do want to be rich, I think I'd be a good administrator of the money to tell you the truth. But that doesn't mean I'm pro-rich as a social class. I'...
September 06, 2017 at 18:49
To be more clear, I am not pro rich as a social class, if you thought that, then that would be wrong. I am pro the possibility of getting rich. I thin...
September 06, 2017 at 18:18
The reason for that is that the rich should be breaking their brains to do something productive with that wealth, not keep it growing while doing noth...
September 06, 2017 at 18:02
Yes.
September 06, 2017 at 17:53
It is true that thinkers prior to Aristotle did associate potency with chaos (I'm thinking primarily Anaxagoras {I think it was}, but I don't see this...
September 06, 2017 at 16:44
You can record this moment in your calendar, and if you're right you can laugh at me the way I laughed at you when you so confidently predicted Crooke...
September 06, 2017 at 16:40
Sure, I have no doubt about that. However, I don't think that Trump's budget is the equivalent of inviting them to piss down that body's neck. We'll s...
September 06, 2017 at 16:39
Hmmm - but there certainly seems to be a difference between act and order/chaos. The Aristotelian act/potency dichotomy seems to be beyond the dichoto...
September 06, 2017 at 16:36
I guess the other issue here is whether order is primordial, or chaos is primordial. If order is primordial, then chaos would emerge out of order. But...
September 06, 2017 at 13:22
Ah yes, my bad. No idea why I made that confusion. Yes, I would agree that that is too little as an increase on average for the bottom 20%. The other ...
September 06, 2017 at 10:33
But it seems to me that most people who go into government seem to be the worst kind of individuals in the first place - privileged, went to the very ...
September 06, 2017 at 10:13
I think anarchy works in small communities. Larger communities will need a very small state, preferably a non-democratic one - ie constitutional monar...
September 06, 2017 at 10:06
No, the remedy is very simple. Get rid of the power of government, then the rich cannot become more politically influential in the first place. Power ...
September 06, 2017 at 09:34
Well I'm not the only one on philosophy forums with similar views. And no, I'm not a Randian, thanks for the red herring though.
September 06, 2017 at 08:31
I've read that, and I don't agree with it. I see nothing wrong with making a lot of money in and of itself. It depends what the person does with that ...
September 06, 2017 at 08:30
>:O >:O I tell you, with these services you should sometimes be happy that at least they haven't harmed you!
September 06, 2017 at 08:28
Oh so just comparing EPA to defense increase, is that a fair comparison? :s Defence isn't even the biggest source of budget spending: https://media.na...
September 06, 2017 at 08:24
If Gaia theory is true, is it possible for our planet to have feedback mechanisms that will cool down the planet in response to our pumping of CO2 in ...
September 05, 2017 at 20:01
In fact, I did call the police one time when I got my place attacked in the UK and guess what - they came in 2 days, and ended up doing almost nothing...
September 05, 2017 at 19:45
And to get back to the point we were talking about, you were wrong that the percentage of poor people that pay a higher tax is greater than the percen...
September 05, 2017 at 19:38
I disagree that those services you mention require the kind of overly controlling, big bureacratic state we have today.
September 05, 2017 at 19:35
Nope, not 35.5% will see their taxes go up. Only 6.8% will see their taxes go up: I don't need the state, I need a community of people. I've further c...
September 05, 2017 at 19:29
And I don't really agree with super high taxes for the rich. For example, I'm someone who spends a lot of time working, studying and learning. If in 2...
September 05, 2017 at 19:19
Did you not read that 26.9% of the richest 20% will actually see their taxes go up? Did you not read that 22% of the next bracket of rich will see the...
September 05, 2017 at 19:09
Anyway, it's not as bad as you seem to try to oversimplify it to be.
September 05, 2017 at 19:02
Yeah of course, because their income is already small! When you apply a percentage to a small income, you're not going to get a huge dollar amount ret...
September 05, 2017 at 19:01
The US needed budget cuts even if we were to ignore the tax cuts that Trump seeks to introduce. Also tax cuts aren't just for the wealthy. So the so c...
September 05, 2017 at 18:40
The issue is a lot more complicated than your simplistic picture. Yes he does cut out budgets for several state programs that were meant for the disad...
September 05, 2017 at 18:10
Ha ha - I think that's China's gambit. They want a fool in the region who they can manipulate and maybe start a conflict to expand their sphere of inf...
September 05, 2017 at 12:49
Yes, I would certainly say so. Communities of people are allowed to express their opinions freely.
September 05, 2017 at 09:44
No, they wouldn't, but they would be unacceptable because of the consequences that they can give rise to.
September 05, 2017 at 09:22
>:)
September 05, 2017 at 09:00
Yes, absolutely, so long as what is being said doesn't include threats of physical violence, terrorist propaganda, and such things.
September 05, 2017 at 08:57