You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Agustino

Comments

Yes, but if materialism were true (which is what we have to assume for their explanation to make sense), then your subjective experience of time flowi...
September 21, 2017 at 20:56
Why do you say that?
September 21, 2017 at 20:42
Imagine for a moment that everything that happens in the current world speeds up to twice the speed. Objective time, as measured by the light clock, w...
September 21, 2017 at 20:39
Well, physics obviously speaks about physical time that can be measured by a light clock which is invariant regardless of frame of reference. This is ...
September 21, 2017 at 20:25
Why?
September 21, 2017 at 20:07
Nope, Rich has a problem with SR, not with GR.
September 21, 2017 at 15:34
Yes.
September 21, 2017 at 15:29
Spacetime effectively is GR.
September 21, 2017 at 15:20
It depends which equations you elevate to ontology. You should elevate the most general framework. In the case of gravity, this would be general relat...
September 21, 2017 at 15:18
The assumptions you are worrying about are neither true nor false, but useful. That's why they are assumptions and postulates, and not truths.
September 21, 2017 at 14:25
Yes, but this belies a complete misunderstanding of how science works. Science doesn't work by finding out what is "true". It works by approximating w...
September 21, 2017 at 14:25
When you say this, it's just as silly as telling me to drop Euclid's 5th Postulate when doing Euclidean geometry because it's not true. Absurd. Yes, i...
September 21, 2017 at 14:21
It seems you are confused. When I assume that the internal angles of a triangle are 180 degrees and proceed to calculate using that assumption, I don'...
September 21, 2017 at 14:19
None, that's why SR, much like Newton's theory and Euclidean geometry provide USEFUL approximations. They're easier to work with and calculate than th...
September 21, 2017 at 14:12
Are you doing this on purpose?! Do all books on Newton's theories have to be dropped out of the library because his theory has been replaced by GR?! D...
September 21, 2017 at 14:11
It's as silly as asking why we still calculate using Newton... well, because it works if space is locally flat, which happens to be the case around he...
September 21, 2017 at 14:07
SR has been dropped when GR has been adopted. Really... you seem behind on science. The only reason SR is taught is the same reason Euclidean geometry...
September 21, 2017 at 14:03
Yes of course they are! What did you expect? It's like telling me that space is defined differently in Euclidean and Non-Euclidean geometry. This of c...
September 21, 2017 at 13:56
No it doesn't. Spacetime itself expands faster than light, but spacetime isn't actually an object the way galaxies, planets, etc. are. Galaxies, etc. ...
September 21, 2017 at 13:44
The same is true in GR.
September 21, 2017 at 13:39
https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/134417/is-special-relativity-a-special-case-of-general-relativity-qualitatively
September 21, 2017 at 13:38
Sorry to disappoint, but I'm still alive >:O
September 21, 2017 at 12:44
Yes, the US could possibly reduce defense budget to 2-2.5%. My only question is why US military is not tens of years ahead of everyone else already...
September 21, 2017 at 09:43
SR and GR are not different... This seems to be very pseudo-scientific right here. SR is a special case of GR, which occurs mainly when we're dealing ...
September 21, 2017 at 09:34
Yes, but you of course ignore how that spending relates to a country's economic power. When we compare it to GDP, we'll see that the US rests around 3...
September 21, 2017 at 08:45
And I'm an old school spiritualist :P - look at the spiritual climate of the times and try to adjust to it, for you can certainly not change it by you...
September 21, 2017 at 08:42
Then you ought to certainly cast both of them aside if you really want to rely just on psychology. Okay.
September 20, 2017 at 18:36
Yes, I've been running, cooking dinner and eating earlier. Hence why I haven't answered you yet. Don't be in such a hurry. Even now I have to finish s...
September 20, 2017 at 17:30
Right, I fail to see what any of this has to do with the subject matter of the essay. It's just like me telling you don't listen to Wagner because he ...
September 20, 2017 at 16:25
Yes, there have been quite a few. Have a look at the paper I mentioned.
September 20, 2017 at 13:29
I disagree. It largely has to do with the era in question. The ages have different governing spiritual principles that dictate the mindset of most peo...
September 20, 2017 at 13:27
Of course quantum fields can't be defined as non-physical. Why would you think so?
September 20, 2017 at 12:20
A quantum field isn't 'nothing'. If anything, QM proves that nothing (a pure vacuum) is impossible.
September 20, 2017 at 11:42
My society makes Trump impossible precisely by changing our values. A philanderer cannot be a cool guy who is admired by his society (even if secretly...
September 20, 2017 at 11:25
Yes indeed. That's because "international diplomacy" is in truth nothing but a power game. In fact, it doesn't need the mask anyway - this is what you...
September 20, 2017 at 11:19
Here's our fundamental difference, and why I like Trump while you hate Trump. You believe that something being publically acceptable defines how civil...
September 20, 2017 at 10:36
I see. But that does mean that you will, at the minimum, be slow to take positions and act towards bringing them about no? I think we should always st...
September 20, 2017 at 09:25
That is interesting. Now what?
September 20, 2017 at 09:11
Yeah, what makes it the best? Materialism for that matter is also a "satisfying" solution because it denies that the mind exists in any way transcende...
September 20, 2017 at 09:05
Why would I in particular not be psychologically open to rational argument? Is it because according to you I lack a certain emotional response? If tha...
September 19, 2017 at 19:59
Because it seems that you presuppose that me becoming convinced of the wrongness of X entails that I already have a (negative) emotional reaction to i...
September 19, 2017 at 19:39
Are you an emotivist when it comes to morality? The reason I'm asking is that it seems to me that your point is that you can't rationally convince any...
September 19, 2017 at 19:28
I doubt it's that easy for him to be financially ruined. How could that happen? He has upward of $50 million, it's not easy to lose that much money, u...
September 19, 2017 at 19:06
If the video was of Trump hitting any old lady with a golf ball that would have been disgusting and not funny. However, the video is funny because Cli...
September 19, 2017 at 19:01
I just think you're taking the video too seriously. I don't see how it would legitimise violence against Clinton. It's more like a symbolic video show...
September 19, 2017 at 18:50
Yes, let's do that when I become a corrupt, narcissistic & dishonest politician funneling money through my foundation :P It's just a funny clip, has n...
September 19, 2017 at 18:14
What do you mean it's "the best solution" to the mind-body problem? And what does that have to do with the becoming/being dichotomy (flux)?
September 19, 2017 at 11:36
Well, it is the case for most people in Western societies, where life expectancy is quite high. Yes, this may be true for some non-human organisms, bu...
September 19, 2017 at 09:25
Yes, I too hold that in the debate between society and individual, the individual ultimately stands superior from a spiritual point of view. I'm not a...
September 18, 2017 at 18:32
Not that this is a bad thing, it's certainly much better than our Western rampant individualism :P
September 18, 2017 at 18:09