You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Agustino

Comments

Nope, not must come in. Rather it inevitably and necessarily always is there. It is necessary itself, but only because it emanates from the divine. I ...
April 17, 2016 at 09:34
What do you mean exactly by this?
April 17, 2016 at 09:31
That is indeed a correct criticism :D . I never understood people's fascination with Hume. To me, it just is evidently clear that his philosophy is so...
April 17, 2016 at 09:30
What makes you think the radical skepticism there refers to ethical matters? It actually refers to epistemological matters, and I claim that Hume's et...
April 17, 2016 at 09:27
Cite where I've made this claim please. I have never read a more incoherent sentence. "Something that can be known PRIOR TO KNOWLEDGE". Alright. Same ...
April 17, 2016 at 02:35
Yes (although I am thinking to stop soon, and start a new business - I sold my previous). I'm not sure I like it, I just don't dislike it. It has taug...
April 17, 2016 at 02:30
Explain yourself. And why do you think there isn't proof for ethical truths? (you call it a category error - now prove it!) Granted that human beings ...
April 17, 2016 at 02:08
It's hard to pinpoint to one thing, or even a group of things. Many things happened, either causing or as a result of my changing. I will list a few f...
April 17, 2016 at 00:49
I certainly didn't. My positions and approach to everything RADICALLY changed around 17-20. Well, given the Western cultural millieu, I think it is su...
April 16, 2016 at 18:24
I think Aristotle offered a solution to this amongst many others no? :P The forms are not separate from the objects - one substance, two (intellectual...
April 16, 2016 at 17:41
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MMkt20_NCoo https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UcnffraTYeM
April 16, 2016 at 11:38
How strange you are, now you're saying exactly what I've been saying. I entirely agree with you, and in fact have told you that it is a mistake to tre...
April 16, 2016 at 11:32
How quaint that I don't disagree with any of this :D
April 16, 2016 at 01:49
lol... you wanna give me a heroic way to die :P
April 16, 2016 at 00:49
"It is not difficult to avoid death, gentlemen; IT IS MUCH MORE DIFFICULT TO AVOID WICKEDNESS, FOR IT RUNS FASTER THAN DEATH But sure that if you kill...
April 16, 2016 at 00:25
Oh thanks, I was about to suffocate actually....
April 16, 2016 at 00:19
@"Sapientia"Yes I am waiting ;)
April 16, 2016 at 00:14
Why are there no Platonists? Seriously, 6 Aristotle lovers. I was hoping to get a good debate with a strong Platonist, who would point out my misunder...
April 15, 2016 at 23:29
I think that's what I mean by affection. I don't just mean validation.
April 15, 2016 at 23:19
Ah yes, I already pre-empted that. The problem is, unless you adopt Hume's radical skepticism you won't be able to support that view. And if you do ad...
April 15, 2016 at 23:13
I haven't seen an actual fight of 1 v 4-5 (if I had, I would have helped the poor guy! lol :D ), but I told you my friend fended off 3 men with bats w...
April 15, 2016 at 23:07
Well I don't know how you got your knowledge about martial arts, but I can tell you that your views are unrealistic when it comes to people who actual...
April 15, 2016 at 22:59
That would again need to be proven. I think, just like Spinoza, Aristotle, and Plato that we can arrive at morality rationally once we understand the ...
April 15, 2016 at 22:52
In so far as monks also have needs of a sexual nature, they also display a certain gayness about themselves. You think of sexual needs solely as mastu...
April 15, 2016 at 22:45
Yes that is indeed true. But note that I have generally referred to the geniuses of mankind from the past when I refer to the Ancients or to other cul...
April 15, 2016 at 22:21
I don't devalue them. If someone chooses to be irrational do you think I am the one devaluing them? I just raise the point that they are devaluing the...
April 15, 2016 at 22:18
Your link is not specific. I looked at the first thing that came up. http://www.historyofwomen.org/oppression.html It is true that there are incidents...
April 15, 2016 at 22:07
Right, my apologies, I actually couldn't watch that because I was at work! Thanks for reminding me, I'll have a look soon!
April 15, 2016 at 21:51
Indeed. That's why we must investigate it rationally instead of merely enforce a view saying that we have some hidden argument which justifies the cur...
April 15, 2016 at 21:49
No you intentionally chose one in order to smear what I try to say, and associate it with something that was evil from the past so as to make it lose ...
April 15, 2016 at 21:45
Gender roles are social constructs, not moral ones primarily. I've argued that gender roles can and do have moral impacts on society sometimes.
April 15, 2016 at 21:31
Virtue OR traits. Sounds interchangeable to me. He certainly seems to believe they are virtues, I guess we could ask him. Oh yes, as if sexual moralit...
April 15, 2016 at 21:28
People are expected to follow social expectations yes - that's kind of tautological though.
April 15, 2016 at 21:14
This is a philosophy forum, and we're not children playing hide and seek. If you have arguments you present them. If you don't present them, you canno...
April 15, 2016 at 21:05
Right. You didn't say it was a virtue. Then what the fuck were you saying above there in response to jamalrob who used trait/virtue interchangeably? W...
April 15, 2016 at 21:03
Proof? As far as I am aware, I was the only one in that thread who provided SEVERAL links to historical sources proving my points ;) . It's easy when ...
April 15, 2016 at 20:58
Gender roles are social expectations from each gender. They are always there, regardless of what they actually happen to be.
April 15, 2016 at 20:48
Nope, it certainly doesn't discredit itself, it it did, then certainly you and Wosret would not bother with the insults. Yes, in the absence of an arg...
April 15, 2016 at 20:47
Yes this is correct. However, the problem isn't at the individual level. The problem isn't that individual X who is a man has become effeminate (for s...
April 15, 2016 at 18:00
Yes, historically speaking your views are considered radical. Most human beings who have ever lived in fact would consider your views radical.
April 15, 2016 at 17:58
I would add a few more: confidence, self-belief, justice, loyalty. The feminine virtues on the other hand are along the lines of love, compassion, kin...
April 15, 2016 at 17:51
Yes I understand. You don't want to argue on this issue, for the simple reason that you don't have an argument. Instead, you just want to throw dirt a...
April 15, 2016 at 15:24
Because it involves spending time with men as opposed to women if you are a man. In that sense, it is gay, because one is attracted to spend ones time...
April 15, 2016 at 15:23
Right, thanks for admitting once again that you are not interested in argument, but rather in using peer pressure to impose your radical views :) .
April 15, 2016 at 15:03
Why do you think Plato valued homosexual love more than heterosexual love in the Symposium? Remember that Socrates did not have sex with Alcibiades, b...
April 15, 2016 at 14:57
This is not individualism Sapientia, but rather lack of community spirit, and selfishness. There's a difference between the two :) .
April 15, 2016 at 14:55
Fitness culture has actually produced people with big muscles, but very weak. If you look historically, men were not as bulky as they are now. Julius ...
April 15, 2016 at 14:41
Well ... it is one Sapientia. Do you want to argue it isn't? Please then, be my guest and prove your point :) I have illustrated by argument why it is...
April 15, 2016 at 13:04
More insults and no argument. :)
April 15, 2016 at 12:59
Provide me historical evidence for this view, of the kind that there exists regarding slavery of black people during colonial times. Yep. The feminisa...
April 15, 2016 at 12:59