You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Agustino

Comments

Well yes, it's a position I find tempting (and interesting) - that of an absolute freedom not bound by anything. But then I also find that to contain ...
September 18, 2016 at 22:51
Sure but you certainly do see the way in which such effects are less likely in the case of gluttony, and more likely in the case of something like mur...
September 18, 2016 at 22:48
Indeed either way we'll have quite an event. Either it's the first time a former President returns as a spouse, or it is the first time a white billio...
September 18, 2016 at 22:46
If that is so, then you are dangerously close to the Orthodox position. Because you'll end up saying that you love according to the intellect - hence ...
September 18, 2016 at 22:37
Call Elon Musk.
September 18, 2016 at 22:33
I guess BC, the effect of this is that a white penis will be the new President of the United States.
September 18, 2016 at 22:23
Well last time I checked the world was quite different from the US O:) (especially a few places from the US)
September 18, 2016 at 22:21
I think natural law does erect a response to this quandary of yours... namely a penis should be used such that it fulfils its telos.
September 18, 2016 at 22:18
Or rather Christ is the Law... But the only question is "could he break it?" and to that I would answer no. Why? Because his will and intellect are on...
September 18, 2016 at 22:15
Yes but what if you were to find a reason for freely choosing duty? That's Kierkegaard's point. My position would be that I think a mistake is committ...
September 18, 2016 at 21:48
In: Mysticism  — view comment
Seems like an interesting read, thanks for sharing that. His book Saving the Appearances influenced my thinking quite a bit!
September 18, 2016 at 21:42
In: Mysticism  — view comment
indeed, well said! :D
September 18, 2016 at 21:27
In: Mysticism  — view comment
Yes that is true (regarding Platonism). It seems much more other-worldly focused than Catholicism for example. Not that I necessarily view that as a g...
September 18, 2016 at 21:17
Well I think most people's penises are part of them, and in-so-far as this is true, they certainly do matter. If you want to go so-far as to think tha...
September 18, 2016 at 21:09
In: Mysticism  — view comment
Eastern Orthodox Christianity nice to see you quote about it! I'm an Orthodox Christian ;)
September 18, 2016 at 21:05
You may find Kierkegaard's Works of Love interesting at reconciling your idea of radical freedom with the idea of duty - it's one of the core aspects ...
September 18, 2016 at 21:04
I agree with your views! :)
September 18, 2016 at 21:02
Sure, but in practical terms, he was an atheist. His behaviour did not hinge on the belief in gods, as gods have nothing to do with men. Whereas for S...
September 18, 2016 at 18:17
Yes; the difference between Sam Harris and Epicurus is that Epicurus honestly disbelieves in God, while Sam Harris uses his disbelief as a justificati...
September 18, 2016 at 18:09
Could you clarify please in more detail what you mean by this? Thanks :)
September 18, 2016 at 17:18
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2016/09/17/obama_i_will_consider_it_an_insult_to_my_legacy_if_you_do_not_vote_want_to_give_me_a_good_send_off_g...
September 18, 2016 at 15:03
That sin and error are necessary for the progression of an individual is undeniable. However - a society, in order to maintain the stability required ...
September 18, 2016 at 14:09
Why don't you start then? :D
September 18, 2016 at 13:57
Ah the pious atheism of Epicurus! >:O How I miss that atheism....
September 18, 2016 at 10:21
Whatever Became of Sin by Karl Menninger (a psychiatrist) discusses this idea in detail if you are interested. Yes agreed. I don't think this is entir...
September 18, 2016 at 10:19
Yes - I think that's good because not everyone has the wisdom or the time to be a philosopher and understand how some particular may affect them espec...
September 18, 2016 at 10:05
I disagree :) I am an Aristotelian when it comes to ethics, although I do disagree with a few of Feser's interpretations. For example, he admits, like...
September 17, 2016 at 19:17
I'm out of here then I guess :P
September 17, 2016 at 15:33
Well the real answer I believe is that "nothing is wrong in simply enjoying life". Simply enjoying life is probably the best way to live. However - th...
September 17, 2016 at 13:00
LOL - debates will destroy Crooked, in the same way they destroyed Jeb! >:O
September 17, 2016 at 11:54
And really my main point was just that the discourse "everything is transient" is very confusing and likely to lead someone into the wrong view - nihi...
September 17, 2016 at 11:53
Yes but the other things are also goods - which is very important. Many from the Platonic tradition go to the extreme of saying that just because the ...
September 17, 2016 at 11:49
Well you have to consider what one truly desires when they opt for fast food, porn, mindless entertainment, money, thrills etc. They are very likely c...
September 17, 2016 at 11:42
Why slowly the situation sounds quite urgent to me :-O
September 17, 2016 at 11:34
Maybe if the FBI fudges the elections :-*
September 17, 2016 at 11:26
Not if you define satiety, as one should, as incomplete fulfilment of desire (it's incomplete because desire rises again - if it was complete, no desi...
September 17, 2016 at 11:11
That time when you peacefully watch a youtube philosophy presentation, and then look at the comments to discover that one of the TPF members is out th...
September 17, 2016 at 10:55
Really? If that were true, man's fulfilment would be impossible. Man has desire. Desire is the reflection of an emptiness, a thirst. Filling that empt...
September 17, 2016 at 10:23
@"Sapientia" - watch from 0:50 - lol :D http://edition.cnn.com/videos/politics/2016/09/16/bernie-sanders-interview-sot-3-newday.cnn
September 17, 2016 at 10:07
Oh give me a break! Nowhere in there is there a hint about Clinton's assassination, that is just crazy from the media. I've listened to his speeches y...
September 17, 2016 at 09:58
How is that possible? It's impossible that a man whose life is not transformed by it is in possession of the truth. It's a performative contradiction....
September 16, 2016 at 22:23
But this is an excuse. Who cares if his works were peerless? They clearly weren't so powerful as to get him to change. So it's in the end just beautif...
September 16, 2016 at 22:15
Thanks for your kinds words :)
September 16, 2016 at 22:06
And maybe also add that rightfully so :D lol You shall know them by their fruits - what were their fruits? Watts used to persevere in doing drugs and ...
September 16, 2016 at 22:01
Peirce did criticise Descartes's method of doubt involving the evil demon though. If that criticism applies to Descartes, it certainly applies to the ...
September 16, 2016 at 21:44
The "evidence" is that his poll numbers were lower after the Orlando attacks? Let me remind you that in that period a lot of other events happened, in...
September 16, 2016 at 21:31
Sounds like a rehash of Pragmatism :D
September 16, 2016 at 19:59
Why do you think so? I think regardless of whether he's a good or bad man, he surely isn't a parody. He's got some very difficult construction project...
September 16, 2016 at 19:52
So you want to have one foot in heaven and the other in hell? :-*
September 16, 2016 at 13:08
Because in the UK most people only listen to mass-media snippets of him - not to full speeches. The mass-media is making a caricature of it - they are...
September 16, 2016 at 12:08