I don't read it that way. The PK is not a tyrant, Plato has another category for tyranny. The PK and the surrounding aristocracy are those dedicated t...
Plato's political analysis is not naive, it's simply the only analysis that is possible from the reference frame of a decaying democracy (remember tha...
Surely, but that there is no difference between liberals and conservatives in practice on divorce/marriage, that suggests that inactive beliefs don't ...
Why do you reckon this is the case, given the conservative beliefs with regards to marriage? Really? I'd expect this to be so for Orthodox Jews, but c...
In all seriousness now, I don't personally eat much meat, but that's for health reasons (as most meat isn't actually healthy). I could also see spirit...
But certainly it seems to me that you would (1) unintentionally have the child (since you, your family and your doctor clearly don't intend this to ha...
Yes, but this scenario is very different from the scenario in which you, by your own fault, got a defenceless person to be temporarily parasitic on yo...
You have given it life the moment you have conceived it as far as I see things. Okay, under my society, people in your condition would be allowed to h...
So what will you do if Roe vs Wade is overturned in the US? You do realise that this doesn't depend on you as a person. You are just one vote, and jus...
But wait a second, you yourself have said that it's the capacity for pain and suffering that makes killing it immoral. So if man has a greater capacit...
Then what is it? If you don't want them to be in there, how did they get in there? Did they magically pop in there? If that's the case, I might agree ...
No, for that would entail that realpolitik is an ethics itself. I agree, such a person would probably act in an immoral way if he has no other system ...
:-} LOL! Surely that only holds true if you're risking your life in carrying them in your body and giving birth to them. Otherwise it's your fault for...
I do X-) (joking lol) There is no question of rights here. All this talk about rights drives me crazy. The question is what's morally correct to do fo...
Why are we required to swat the mosquito? We could let it live and bite us, or we could put a bit more effort to get it out of our homes without killi...
See I would disagree with you here. My moral instinct tells me that this is wrong. Ask yourself if running over a cat really is just as bad as running...
Can someone explain to this guy for me please, what philosophical error he's engaging in? :-} Perhaps he should also tell us where I have stated that ...
Is killing a human being worse than killing an ant? Is running a human being over with your car worse than running a cat over? If you answer yes to an...
Only if you consider that killing a microbe (or even 1 trillion microbes) is equivalent to killing a human being. To my mind, they're not equivalent a...
Really... I find someone who cuts trees for fun, who steps over roses, who rips out a plant's leaves one by one, all these for fun to be highly immora...
No but consider how we feel about killing mosquitos compared to killing animals. We feel very very differently. I think there's a reason for this. You...
It seems to me that the more fundamental condition for having moral worth is that something is a living being. Whether or not such a being feels pain ...
Be more clear, thinking which way? That killing a mosquito is better (but still immoral) compared to killing an animal? I think such thinking is unavo...
The child is a human being whether he is born or not once he is conceived. So yes, there is the loss of a human being. But if the child isn't given bi...
I would dispute all of these three claims. One does not have moral worth by virtue of being able to suffer. For example, the Buddha doesn't suffer any...
No it doesn't. Something cannot be lost unless it exists in the first place. As my society doesn't currently exist, it cannot be lost, it can only be ...
I agree with you regarding the differentiation existing due to reason, but I think this is a significant difference - it's a difference of kind, not o...
Comments