You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Agustino

Comments

True, but people don't like to be in subjection, so that's difficult for the US. If you keep them too much in subjection they will rebel and form a co...
February 02, 2017 at 16:23
Not really. As things stand now, in 20 years, China will be twice the size of US X-)
February 02, 2017 at 16:14
It could be read that way, but doesn't necessarily have to be. I think Trump is quite isolationist in terms of military. He wants US to be strong and ...
February 02, 2017 at 15:58
Yes kind of. For Schopenhauer, what necessitates the assumption of the noumenon is the fact that experience occurs on a stage which is ideal and not r...
February 02, 2017 at 13:42
Oh yeah, I'm sure you can John. Granted by the fact that you can't even control your mouth, I have high doubts about your capacity to control somethin...
February 02, 2017 at 13:05
Can you explain what your own view of mathematics which we've talked about before by the way, has to do with Schopenhauer's transcendental idealism? :...
February 02, 2017 at 12:57
First you should watch for that prickly and arrogant attitude of yours. I'm under no obligation to provide you with anything, especially while you lac...
February 02, 2017 at 12:53
>:O I never claimed to have thorough knowledge of Hegel. Hegel is not Aristotle, Spinoza, Wittgenstein, Pascal, Schopenhauer, Hamann, Kant, Aquinas, E...
February 02, 2017 at 09:45
Again why does that matter? You post things which are really irrelevant to the thread that is going on. Yes, the fact that non-Euclidean geometries ar...
February 02, 2017 at 00:35
:-} I have read Schopenhauer's WWR Vol I and II, On the Fourfold Root, and numerous works on him like Bryan Magee's, etc. You should stop with this re...
February 02, 2017 at 00:28
The other interesting feature is that non-Euclideanness always presupposes a larger, n+1 dimensional space. So presumably spaces cannot be non-Euclide...
February 01, 2017 at 23:41
You are making an appearance/reality distinction again here. So is this a pheonemon/noumenon distinction then? You are using your terms in a very stra...
February 01, 2017 at 23:09
Ah yes, now it seems to be working... It seems that Heister wanted me to see a grandfather poet engaged in study :D
February 01, 2017 at 22:59
We cannot perceive what it would be, because that would entail having 4D eyes. But - we can perceive what it is by analogy to other dimensions (and he...
February 01, 2017 at 22:53
Sure. But how do we have such knowledge? Is it synthetic a priori as per Schopenhauer/Kant? Do we perceive non-Euclideanness in a priori perception? I...
February 01, 2017 at 22:33
Yes, hence visual/sensory fields The reason behind this thread is that Schopenhauer makes it clear in WWR that space, time and causality cannot apply ...
February 01, 2017 at 22:15
Okay, then I seemingly misunderstand the way you are using perception. Would you like to define it more clearly, so that I can make future arguments b...
February 01, 2017 at 22:00
>:O Well yeah but I use gif in a non-technical way as "image" lol Can you see the image?
February 01, 2017 at 21:28
That's very wierd. But either way, it shows like a wrong link to an image. Does anyone else see that?
February 01, 2017 at 21:24
Firefox or Chrome I tried it with both
February 01, 2017 at 21:19
>:O That's good no? O:)
February 01, 2017 at 21:15
No no I mean it really doesn't show up. My browser shows Willam_Cullen_Bryant-300x246.jpg
February 01, 2017 at 21:14
That gif doesn't show >:O
February 01, 2017 at 21:12
What am I to understand out of these dots? :P A gif would be better >:O
February 01, 2017 at 21:09
Hah - how have I never thought of this for all this time ... Heister Meister Eckhart Eggcart - now it makes sense - you're playing your Eckhart/Eggcar...
February 01, 2017 at 20:41
By the way, I'm disappointed that I'm no longer your favorite philosopher :-} - I mean who the hell is that Leister Blowdart? :-* >:O
February 01, 2017 at 20:34
Eckhart Tolle? O:) >:O Or Eckhart Meister? >:O In either case, I have no doubt about that lol - I never read either one.
February 01, 2017 at 20:31
In addition to those three, @"The Great Whatever" also deserves a mention. While he has moved beyond Schopenhauer, he has read him and has good unders...
February 01, 2017 at 20:26
Curved in a 4th dimension, obviously.
February 01, 2017 at 18:56
Y is time and X is space :-O - but what happens if the x, y, z axis are space, and time is the m axis ;) ? Can you see that? A system with four axes.
February 01, 2017 at 18:49
But we can conceptualise it very easily. We can't imagine it perceptually, but that's another story.
February 01, 2017 at 18:49
Yes that is true, but I've already been discussing with him. He is indeed the only one I'm aware of who is highly knowledgeable in the metaphysics of ...
February 01, 2017 at 18:24
Which one?
February 01, 2017 at 16:34
I hate dealing with such misrepresentations as these - how is space as given in perception even Euclidean to begin with? Parallel lines in perception ...
February 01, 2017 at 15:06
Are there so few people fluent in Schopenhauer on these boards? :s So far no one with any knowledge whatsoever of Schopenhauer has replied in this thr...
February 01, 2017 at 14:51
Yes, I think you are partly correct. But then, not all idols, as Wayfarer adds, are material - there are also immaterial idols. So what is the commona...
February 01, 2017 at 14:23
No, all that it assumes is that one must have a master in the sense used Biblically. Even if there is no God, one must have a master.
February 01, 2017 at 14:20
So if nothing practically makes your life about love, then it really isn't about love at all is it? It's one thing to try and fail, and another not to...
February 01, 2017 at 14:19
"Yes, it happened when he told me that casual sex is immoral" X-) >:O
February 01, 2017 at 14:15
Yes! It's not the action, but the heart. Indeed! The next thing to investigate is how an object, an idea, a person, or anything else can become an ido...
February 01, 2017 at 00:48
Let's go back to the Kierkegaard quote with which this thread started. If I can bow down before a stone shaped idol, and still pray to the true God, t...
February 01, 2017 at 00:21
Well I stated my point clearly - so is it a true statement that "life cannot be reduced to a concept" or is it a false statement? Even an entire life ...
February 01, 2017 at 00:18
Right. So then life cannot be reduced to concept, is that correct? Why so quick to judge? :)
February 01, 2017 at 00:02
This is not a thread for discussing Kant's transcendental idealism - that should have been clear. You do perceive non-Euclidean space. Not directly. B...
January 31, 2017 at 23:52
Why is this a problem? Why can't the lived well-being be reduced to some conception?
January 31, 2017 at 23:47
Ok. So if Love is greater than you, it is not completely contained by you - it always exceeds you. And in order to know it, and be closer to it - you ...
January 31, 2017 at 23:46
Is all of it in you? Or is your asceticism a way to reach out of yourself? Is Love greater than you or equal to you?
January 31, 2017 at 23:36
So it seems you see no problem with a priori intuitions being false. In trying to save Schopenhauer, you're already on the run - re-treating to saying...
January 31, 2017 at 23:30
The metaphor isn't central. Space, time and causality form the framework in which representation necessarily occurs, according to Schopenhauer. This f...
January 31, 2017 at 23:25
It certainly doesn't seem like you'd find such a person right under your nose :)
January 31, 2017 at 23:21