You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

ghost

Comments

I agree. What do you think of Hobbes? I'd call him one of the good guys. In Hobbes the subject/object game is downplayed, and he focuses on the practi...
May 22, 2019 at 02:36
Indeed. Of course here I am targeting phantasms, a ghostbusting ghost. I justify that by insisting that the earlier critics of phantasms got it pretty...
May 22, 2019 at 02:28
I agree, but I'd also stress that new phantasms are created in the science of phantasms, and this is what I mean by metaphysicks^2 and metaphysicks^3....
May 22, 2019 at 02:07
The 'real conversation' theme is great, as is insisting on the gap between academic concerns and philosophy that matters to us as worldly mortals. We ...
May 22, 2019 at 02:03
Just looked him up. Sounds fascinating. But what one often sees is Wittgenstein himself becoming part of the disease. The disease is a hungry Hegelian...
May 22, 2019 at 01:55
I agree. And, speaking of Nietzsche, he's largely valuable as one more eloquent attitude to have spent some time with. In my mind, being educated is c...
May 22, 2019 at 01:52
Same here. I love philosophy. I consider it a central expression of what some would call my spirituality. My distaste for phantasms is connected to a ...
May 22, 2019 at 01:44
I was excited to see your post. I had to pipe up and support it.
May 22, 2019 at 01:39
I agree, at least when it comes to much of philosophy. To keep metaphysicks going, such critiques must be (falsely) assimilated by those too attached ...
May 22, 2019 at 01:34