No hope for gods...no hope for gaps. What I wrote is correct. You should grow up and acknowledge that ANYONE asserting "there are no gods" or "there i...
If you are asserting "there are no gods" or "it is more likely that there are no gods than that there is at least one... ...YOU ARE JUST MAKING A BLIN...
That is nonsense. My "whole argument" is exactly as stated: Anyone asserting "there is at least one god" or "there are no gods" or "it is more likely ...
One side is blindly guessing there are no gods. One side is blindly guessing there is at least one god. And you think one side is not almost certainly...
Easy on the drugs, Tim. They fuck you up. You do not get to tell me where I do not belong. And my comment is correct. But you don't like the fact that...
BOTTOM LINE: Anyone asserting "there is at least one god" or "there are no gods" or "it is more likely that there is at least one god than that there ...
Sort of like the response to "You can lead a horse to water, but you cannot make him drink." Don't "try to make him drink." Make him thirsty! Mostly, ...
You are indeed blind if YOU cannot SEE what nonsense you are peddling here. MY ORIGINAL STATEMENT...the one you took issue with was identical to the o...
Ya gotta be able to handle things better than this, 180. If you show you are thin-skinned...and that you have to resort to those kinds of childish ins...
Consult a logician at any university...and he/she will laugh at your attempt. Or...just pretend you have made a point. Either way works for me. Anyone...
Coward? To debate you? C'mon...get serious. There is no way you will ever accept me showing you how absurd and amateurish your "syllogism" is. So...ju...
As with Tim...you would NEVER accept it from me. So...go consult with a logician at a local university. He/she will tell you, in a nice way, I am sure...
The best way to show the problem with 180 "syllogism" is to adapt it into another form. Here we go: P1: I suspect anyone who would post a "syllogism" ...
You are out of control. That happens when a person who does not like to acknowledge being wrong... ...IS WRONG. Grow up. Acknowledge you are wrong. Yo...
Yes, the syllogism I gave is. The one you gave is defective...and does not even come close to applying to what we are discussing. I gave you the C...a...
Actually, Amen is closer to being correct than you, Tim. You gave a defective syllogism, which even if corrected would be of no more value to what we ...
C'mon, Tim. Try that kind of crap with an amateur, not with me. We are not trying to show that "God (whatever that is) is a materially existing thing....
You have not given me a reason. You have typed some English words...and claim they are a reason. Put your supposed reason into a syllogism with the co...
A reason! Stop being obtuse. The fact that you cannot find an elephant in your room...or in your cup...is not a "reason" why elephants are impossible ...
You did not give me a reason. You might as well have written that ice cream tastes good. My "agenda" is to speak the truth. If you want to pretend def...
Tim, that is embarrassing to even read. The best I could do with it is: What the hell does that even mean? I have no idea of why you think that not on...
Yes, absolutely no reason whatever. Do you have any reasons to suspect gods CANNOT exist? Share them. We can discuss the reasons. I suspect there are ...
I am not going to speak for Amen... but my position has been stated clearly. Here it is again: I do not know if gods exist or not; I see no reason to ...
An absolutely indispensable ingredient to using "atheist" as a descriptor...is the BELIEF either that there are no gods...or the BELIEF that it is mor...
I do see the "tongue in cheek" aspect, Eric, but at the same time, I see the question as meaningful. I thank you for it, because it gives me a chance ...
I most assuredly am not in over my head. But, people who like to call themselves atheists realize they are outclassed by agnostic arguments...and reso...
I agree with that last part...the word "belief" is very slippery. Many, but not all people who use the descriptor "atheist" do indeed "believe" there ...
Your reasoning is wrong. You acknowledge that "a-theos" means without a god...but then start to insert that "belief" thing. Essentially, you are ackno...
None, 180. No worship...no fear of being "damned"...no fear requiring protection or salvation. Fact is, I WOULD guess that if there are gods...none of...
One thing everyone ought to keep in mind is that... ...at some point 1200 to 1400 years ago, a scholar said to a student a version of, "Now that we ha...
I have not contradicted myself. I did not such thing. I merely pointed out some observations I have made about people who use the descriptor "atheist"...
I most assuredly am not "in over my head." You are doing the equivalent of a theist asking an atheist to prove there are no gods. You are attempting t...
Even odder that you think that is what I am "telling you." You suggested that I zoomed in on the wrong word. I am saying that I didn't. If you have so...
As I said, I you want to be "ignotic" on the question of whether gods exist or not...I respect that. If you want to identify as theistic, pantheistic,...
Thank you, Eric. In my opinion, that was the most reasonable reply to what I am saying thus far. Keep in mind that I am offering what I MEAN when I us...
Comments