You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Merkwurdichliebe

Comments

The universal: And this also holds true for: And, concerning Jupiter: suppose I see Jupiter in a picture and identify it as jupiter. Then, at a later ...
April 14, 2019 at 02:03
Btw, I thought I'd add: I'm definitely not a Hegelian, but he says thought is what produces the universal, and that thought belongs to subjectivity. S...
April 14, 2019 at 01:46
I think this more aptly describes the universal rather than the objective.
April 14, 2019 at 01:33
Thank you sir.
April 14, 2019 at 01:28
. I'm happy you agree. Just out of curiousity and ignorance on my part, if you'll breifly explain, what is the more common use of the term?
April 14, 2019 at 01:18
...
April 14, 2019 at 01:18
Where did I say that... you give me too much credit my friend, but not enough coherence in your understanding. The gaping ellipsis of your reasoning i...
April 14, 2019 at 01:09
I'm open minded and willing to consider that broader context you speak of, if you're willing to breifly explain what it is. Ill approach it dialectica...
April 14, 2019 at 01:05
even if what is agreed upon is wrong, the fallacy is still based in objectivity. If everyone agreed that subjectivity is some weird metaphysical inwar...
April 14, 2019 at 00:06
Subjectivity is not shared. What is inexpressible (viz. rendered objectively) is actual subjective existence. There, I said it, I referenced the inexp...
April 13, 2019 at 23:01
I philosophize for a purpose: to discover the usefulness of the useless.
April 13, 2019 at 20:13
Yes, Neitsche's philosophic spirit is far superior to the soulless analytical garbage pervading present day philosophy. His aphoristic style is partic...
April 13, 2019 at 17:12
It seems simple to me. Looking at the history of philosophy, I see two options when it comes to the practice of philosophy: the speculative and analyt...
April 13, 2019 at 15:58
Very true, we have digressed from a metaphysical question into epistemoloy.
April 13, 2019 at 08:32
If we consider two subjects, and they are sitting in the same room, they indeed share a common or public experience, from which we can possibly draw s...
April 13, 2019 at 08:12
The knowledge obtained from such a test would count as an objectively verified truth about a test subject's experience of taste. Yet the measurement, ...
April 13, 2019 at 07:54
I still can't grasp the notion of a subjective statement, given that a statement belongs to the objective as written or spoken expression. All I have ...
April 13, 2019 at 07:21
Is "yes", then we must ask what a subjective statement is. And how is subjective truth verified without negating it in objectivity?
April 13, 2019 at 06:13
I agree, it is immediate existence that is of primary importance. And only the subject relates directly to existence. The direct relation is negated w...
April 13, 2019 at 00:31
I cannot possibly believe that is what you believe.
April 12, 2019 at 23:29
Faith and proof are opposites, hence the merit of religion is nullified when proof is necessary for apprehending truth. It is the classic battle of re...
April 12, 2019 at 23:14
Pre apprehension sounds a lot like Kierkegaard's concept of appropriation. He explains that the subject appropriates truth directly in existence. Reli...
April 12, 2019 at 22:01
My opinion on the OP: science is secular just like history or mathematics, but secular doesn't necessarily mean athiestic. Jake: perhaps there is no f...
February 27, 2019 at 11:54