Free will. We don’t have to be angry. We can chose to manage it, or not. We can take something lying around that’s not ours or we can leave it. We can...
I don’t think we select behaviour. It rises up according to conditions. I think we chose when and how to let it assert itself through our free will. W...
What else could it be? Unless you want to say it’s cultural. Hence my reference to primates that also behave this way. It wasn’t our culture that infl...
From what I’ve read actions like this are not within their norms. There has even been the theory that it’s the imposition of humans on their environme...
International Journal of Primatology April 1992, Volume 13, Issue 2, pp 209–212 | Cite as Understanding behavior. What primate studies tell us about h...
Considering some of the OPs moved to the lounge I don’t understand why this is still here. Edit: but I think I understand. If it’s not seen here other...
Laws against killing were introduced after, or as a result of, the killings. They were a response. So in some ways the law doesn’t really define murde...
Do you think there might have been premeditated feeling of hatred in those chimps that attacked the tyrant chimp? Hatred is a lot different than acts ...
This OP is related to the OP about free will and evil, whether humans have evil tendencies. If chimps commit evil acts, a tough call I admit, then it ...
It amounts to a revolutionary act that does go against their social structure. Right or wrong they decided to get rid of him. Though it’s hard to know...
I don’t think “killed” works. Animals kill for food, so do we. The tyrant chimp was killed to remove his presence. His life was taken to rid the world...
I put this up because I had raised it on another OP and deciding if it was murder seemed to me to require its own OP. Why didn’t I tell you what I mea...
Then why would they act badly? A good person will only act in a good way, so it’s only the neutral people doing all the damage? If they have no side o...
Do you mean explain it? Because “defend yourself” sounds like you disagree. What I mean is that they use the artist statement to justify a work that h...
That may be so. But there is evidence of primates murdering. I don’t imagine they think in terms of morality. But if the killing was unnecessary then ...
I’m 100% in agreement with you remember. These people don’t have much of an imagination, they’re not really spontaneously creative. They have to const...
I think it’s become a style of sorts. It’s like all exhibitions have a title. Academia has totally influenced things, because so many artists come thr...
Excuse my confusion, but doesn’t that graph indicate a higher spending by government on people than other countries? I don’t see what’s so bad about t...
I should clarify what meant earlier by natural in reference to evil. It sounds like I meant evil exists in nature. What I meant was that evil is one o...
The trouble is, Hanover, that there’s nothing for them in that. They want immediate satisfaction, not a better world down the line. Maybe they don’t e...
I didn’t say animals, I said primates. If you don’t think they’re capable of evil or good then how would you define good, is it something only humans ...
Comments