You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

unenlightened

Comments

I'm not in the fortune-telling business, especially when it's your fantasy in the first place. But I do think that if the advocates of good sense are ...
October 05, 2017 at 16:32
Yes. In a democracy, politicians have to be responsive to public opinion.
October 05, 2017 at 15:12
I am a butterfly, and I might change the weather. Who knows how many potential mass murderers have been dissuaded, or how many despairing or cynical n...
October 05, 2017 at 13:19
Well the song depicts a man trying to persuade himself that he does not have tender feelings; a man trying to be manly according to a common image of ...
October 05, 2017 at 11:51
Sorry, what question was that?
October 04, 2017 at 20:21
A song for all the real men... https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ii6pRq0-mhY
October 04, 2017 at 16:11
The word you're looking for is 'feminine'. What is feminine there is the aesthetic concern with personal image over substance. Real men delight in the...
October 04, 2017 at 13:53
I can own this by removing one word - well three, for grammar's sake: I don't have to act as if I'm a logic chopping pedant, it comes naturally. I cal...
October 04, 2017 at 13:36
Bah. When you say 'leader', I think you mean 'figurehead' - an image stuck at the prow of the boat - rather than the guy in the stern with his hand on...
October 04, 2017 at 08:49
Well yes, I think you have it about right. Shall we say that a perceived deficiency, measured according to a faulty image of masculinity, leads to an ...
October 03, 2017 at 21:04
Yes, it's a self fulfilling prophecy. What is masculine is what men do. Men, masculine men, sometimes wear make up, and skirts and heels and have sex ...
October 03, 2017 at 20:25
No. I take the view that if one is man, then whatever one does is an expression of masculinity. And I am a real man, so you can safely agree.
October 03, 2017 at 19:19
Nobody likes a clever dick.
October 03, 2017 at 14:59
Me too like to play at linguistics. Me too want special treatment and blue suede shoes. Me always uses both together in posting behaviours, so solly f...
October 02, 2017 at 22:11
Yes, it's a very similar situation.But who organised the referendum in three countries? No one of course. What I'm pointing out is the paradox that be...
October 02, 2017 at 11:06
Incidentally, Catalonia also extends sentimentally into France where there is also Catalan spoken, known by those who speak La Langue D'Oil (Parisian ...
October 01, 2017 at 22:36
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=frAEmhqdLFs
October 01, 2017 at 21:23
No one can be independent, ever.
October 01, 2017 at 21:00
Thing about independence votes, they only work to separate, not much to join together. Identity is always separation. No homage, no fromage; it's a re...
October 01, 2017 at 20:46
Sorry, typo. P(~J?X?D)?P(~J?D).
September 30, 2017 at 22:21
Yes, it's like betting on the favourite and buying a lottery ticket. It works equally well if one is betting against the favourite. P(~J?X?D)?P(J?D). ...
September 30, 2017 at 10:05
The world is at peace. It is the mind that is restless.
September 29, 2017 at 20:54
There is nothing I want to say to cause you any discontent. Perish the thought!
September 29, 2017 at 20:49
In: greetings  — view comment
I love philosophy. (That's an answer to your question, not a confession of perversion.)
September 29, 2017 at 20:41
I am incomparable.
September 29, 2017 at 20:38
In: greetings  — view comment
Hello, welcome. Unfortunately I am old, not new. Sorry to disappoint.
September 29, 2017 at 20:32
I take this to mean, for our purposes, that what works for truth also works for evidence. Ok. Now you need to argue that, because that is what we are ...
September 29, 2017 at 20:17
Apart from the second premise, it is an exact quote of your argument. The second premise is the hidden premise that would make your argument valid.
September 29, 2017 at 20:02
But your argument is invalid. Let me give you a clue. The premise that you need is something like this: If p is true then p ? q is true. If there is s...
September 29, 2017 at 19:58
If you have a valid argument but you have a hidden premise, disclose the hidden premise and present the valid argument. I accept your premise, but you...
September 29, 2017 at 19:41
No. The argument you presented is invalid. How you go about convincing me is to present a valid argument. I accept the premise, but I reject the concl...
September 29, 2017 at 19:38
That argument is invalid.
September 29, 2017 at 18:38
"Why wouldn't there be?" is not a justification for your assertion. I have already presented in great detail considerations as to why there wouldn't b...
September 29, 2017 at 18:26
I don't think it affects my argument; the implication conserves truth, and justification is no more truth than belief is.
September 29, 2017 at 18:10
Ok, let's go back to the beginning. Gettier's claim is that B(p) -> B(p v q) for all q. My complaint about this is that the logic conserves truth, but...
September 29, 2017 at 17:18
Why not call it disempowerment and oppression? I would guess Arendt has in mind life in the concentration camp as the end state of dehumanisation. And...
September 28, 2017 at 17:15
Seems to me that when it it is said that sport has been politicised, it is not that there is a politics of sport in the sense that there is a runners ...
September 28, 2017 at 12:30
We know a song about that. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bogz2xZy-bo
September 27, 2017 at 15:25
I'd like to see some evidence of this, just to make sure it's not dismissing itself.
September 27, 2017 at 11:26
Yes, it certainly seems on the face of it that a deduction from probable p inherits (at least) the same probability. IF (Improbably~p) THEN (improbabl...
September 26, 2017 at 16:31
Well let me ask you a question in return. If you have a reasonable belief p, and a reasonable unconnected scepticism q (say p - that aspirin is an eff...
September 26, 2017 at 10:32
It's not a calculus, merely annotation. In propositional logic, "probably p" or "believed p" does not add up to p, but to (p v ~p)
September 25, 2017 at 21:15
Nothing much. I'll just note that science, probability, and induction/abduction are what S does to arrive at his belief p. No quarrel with him there.
September 25, 2017 at 19:59
Hush. You just is, already.
September 25, 2017 at 19:47
No, it's always sound, because it already has your 'if' incorporated. I put it in capitals so you would notice. It is contentless because it does not ...
September 25, 2017 at 12:37
No. IF p, then (p v q). That's valid, sound, true and contentless. But if not, then q can really just fuck off. A person is to acknowledge the fallibi...
September 24, 2017 at 21:28
What makes a course of events unnatural? Is doing it on a mattress unnatural?
September 24, 2017 at 20:25
No, only if it is an actual truth. Only if it is known, because then it is true. If it is only believed then it may not be true. But in practice, beli...
September 24, 2017 at 20:15
However one couches it, the sceptical element amounts to, by malign accident, improbable circumstance, alternative interpretation of the evidence, or ...
September 24, 2017 at 17:51
But to the topic. There is perfect comfort and peace in the tomb, but this side of it easy is boring, and free is easy. We all hate health and safety ...
September 23, 2017 at 21:33