You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Pair o'Ducks

['Member']Joined: January 06, 2019 at 16:22Last active: January 05, 2023 at 00:25None discussions6 comments

Comments

In: Confused at this paradox of Tao Te Ching  — view comment
I strongly disagree. The interpretation by the spectator is a vital aspect of every art form, regardless of whether the artist's intention was to deli...
January 07, 2019 at 19:00
In: Science is inherently atheistic  — view comment
But then it seems that you assign value to the content of the texts themselves, regardless of whether they have a religious origin. In other words, th...
January 06, 2019 at 21:22
In: Science is inherently atheistic  — view comment
After reading this, I am curious in what respect religious texts have more to offer, in terms of wisdom, than the internet or the literature of the so...
January 06, 2019 at 20:16
In: Another question about a syllogism  — view comment
I agree that the conclusion is invalid on the basis of these two premises alone. For it to be valid, you would need to add the premise that all number...
January 06, 2019 at 19:12
In: Atheism is far older than Christianity  — view comment
And I am quite interested to read the examples that the author supplies, from a historical perspective. It just does not appear, to me, as a claim tha...
January 06, 2019 at 17:27
In: Atheism is far older than Christianity  — view comment
So, basically, this study provides us with the insight that (1) the Abrahamic religions were not the first theistic religions and (2) people have hist...
January 06, 2019 at 16:43
⇧