You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Ulrik

['Member']Joined: January 03, 2019 at 09:58Last active: March 17, 2019 at 11:014 discussions17 comments

Discussions (4)

Comments

Thanks, I think I get it now. I have shown the equation only holds if c has that particular value. If it has any other value, it doesn't hold. So in g...
March 17, 2019 at 11:14
Hello Sophisticat, thanks for your reply. I have however decided to let the matter rest. I'm getting on fine with my mathematics book, and this is cle...
March 17, 2019 at 11:02
@fdrake, Thanks for clearing that up for me. So what I don't understand is how one can suddenly grow broader to any number and still use that broadest...
February 24, 2019 at 12:16
@andrewk, Hrvoje, I must admit that this is all a bit beyond me. Let's see where I lose track. I understand that any number can be rewritten as d0 + d...
February 23, 2019 at 10:45
@TheMadFool, Sophisticat, AndrewK My head is still spinning a bit. I'm still at TheMadFool's proof of - for any number divisible by 3, the sum of the ...
February 17, 2019 at 21:30
Hello TheMadFool, Thanks for your reply. Have we now converted any two digit number into 3k + (k + r)/3 Where the left stands for the first digit, and...
February 09, 2019 at 14:56
Hello fdrake, andrewk and Tim3003, Thanks for your input and continuation of the discussion. To be honest, I'm lost at - for any number divisible by 3...
February 09, 2019 at 14:29
Hello fdrake, Thank you for your reply and additional challenge. Lets see. I want to prove: P2: The last digit of any number determines it being even ...
February 03, 2019 at 18:46
Hello fdrake, Thanks for your reply. Happy to read that my proof, though cruder, works. Sorry for my late response, lots of other responsibilities, yo...
February 03, 2019 at 10:45
Hello fdrake & unenlightened, Thank you for your input. I think I understand, or at least I understand it better now, despite some conflicting instruc...
January 12, 2019 at 10:24
Thank you Pair o'Ducks, fdrake and Sophisticat! I had other duties the last few days hence my late reply. It sure is reassuring that the reasoning is ...
January 11, 2019 at 17:49
Hello Unenlightened, thanks for your reply as well. I've tried to apply your instructions, but I was still a bit confused. Is this what you had in min...
January 06, 2019 at 14:35
Hello SophistiCat, thanks again for your reply. What I gather from it is that, indeed, there is some vagueness in the premises. What I fail to underst...
January 06, 2019 at 14:12
Cheers. When interpretation comes into play, I've learned I'm usually interpreting it wrongly. Common sense I find not obvious at all. Would be cool i...
January 05, 2019 at 10:10
Remaining on the topic I found another tricky syllogism, which I approached by drawing a Venn-diagram, like you did. This is the argument: No decent p...
January 04, 2019 at 11:13
Hello SophistiCat, Thanks for your reply. Yes, you are right, I interpreted 'are' as 'being equal to', not as class membership. Is thinking in class m...
January 04, 2019 at 10:57
Hello MadFool, Thanks for your reply. I am not familiar with the technical jargon of distribution. But yes, I can see that being valuable is the commo...
January 04, 2019 at 10:47