You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Mww

Comments

By this I understand you to mean the conditional “if p then q” does not translate into natural language. If so, I agree, for formal logic is empty of ...
October 25, 2019 at 16:32
Sorry....that flew right over my head. Are you asking me to reword the statement “ all effects must have cause” to validate its truth value? I don’t k...
October 25, 2019 at 15:39
What am I missing, such that you would say yes, but I would say no?
October 25, 2019 at 15:31
And now Tim got there first; I also wish a clarification of.....what he said. I am going to allow you the chance to notice the very specific qualifier...
October 25, 2019 at 15:25
Kantian epistemological philosophy is predicated exclusively on reason and logic, of which “all events must have a cause” is the foremost rendering of...
October 25, 2019 at 15:00
1.) The evidence is out there for anyone to see, that of all the trades available for human endeavor, philosophers tend to pick on each other moreso t...
October 25, 2019 at 13:07
Understood. If the premise had been, “can reason and logic explain that which is present to human observation or mere thought” I wouldn’t have been so...
October 25, 2019 at 12:37
Yeah, but it isn’t. Mental machinations resulting in observable conditions, sure. Tickle this part of the brain, my toes wiggle. Measure 16 phosphorus...
October 25, 2019 at 01:33
Odd, isn’t it? How inherently circular, that reason gives us the means to talk about itself.
October 24, 2019 at 22:17
Twelve pages of philosophy done right, worthy of a subtle nod from the back of the room. Subjectively speaking, of course. Carry on..........
October 24, 2019 at 18:42
Both reason and logic are nothing more than theoretical a priori processes in the human rational system. They don’t explain anything in and of themsel...
October 24, 2019 at 18:19
Reason: the name given to the highest faculty of a human subject, to which all others are subordinated. One is ill-advised to use Descartes or Hume to...
October 24, 2019 at 17:29
I have to admit a knowledge of S to be decidedly less than a knowledge of K. But I do know S was just as much a transcendental idealist as K, based hi...
October 23, 2019 at 00:19
Intellect. The objective reality of a thing cannot be demonstrated as necessary by pure practical reason, without first being conceived as possible by...
October 22, 2019 at 16:17
Concur. Qualia: what gets invented when “representation” isn’t good enough.
October 21, 2019 at 16:06
Eye’s mind. I like it!! Reason’s greatest teaching tool: euphemism.
October 20, 2019 at 18:49
While technically not education per se, as a formal discipline, I tend toward being instructed by a particular kind of philosophy, rather then educate...
October 20, 2019 at 18:22
Hmmm...... Can chaos be designed? If order implies design, and if everything is ordered, wouldn’t chaos be impossible?
October 20, 2019 at 16:57
Sorry....what dichotomy are we talking about here? Yeah, I suppose. Still, anyone living life, no matter the how, if he should internally examine any ...
October 14, 2019 at 22:13
Thanks, but with Kant, one is not often sure he’s got it right. Mostly his fault, though.....he didn’t write for us common folk, doncha know. He wrote...
October 14, 2019 at 20:14
An intuition does not become knowledge; it is the first stage in representing a real external object of which we may have a posteriori knowledge. We “...
October 14, 2019 at 19:05
I guess I was thinking the possession of a good will does not predict with certainty a man will act in accordance with its volitions. He ought to, sur...
October 12, 2019 at 12:48
Ok, fine then. I’ll credit you for putting forward a worthwhile subject for discussion. Seems to be a dearth of them, if anyone were to ask me. Which ...
October 11, 2019 at 11:49
D’accord. As long as things are qualified by “we can say...”. Or at least carry that tacit implication.
October 10, 2019 at 23:48
Yeah, I feel ya. We are simply abbreviating “the totality of conditions adverse to survival” and conceive “danger” by it. Non-rational animalia do nei...
October 10, 2019 at 15:23
That’s actually pretty good.
October 08, 2019 at 20:36
Oh man...a real wordsmith, I must say. William of Warwickshire ain’t got nuttin’ on that. Well....maybe a little. Here and there. No, I’m guessing not...
October 08, 2019 at 20:28
A.) Because of the quote: nothing can be considered good except the will, which is presupposed in the being of a moral agent. This must include the ma...
October 08, 2019 at 15:30
HA!!! Good one. The will is the ideal good, yes. Good without expectation of return. There is an argument, or maybe just an interpretation, that if mo...
October 08, 2019 at 01:10
As it should be, methinks, it being a transcendental conception, meaning it has no object belonging to it necessarily. Others similar being, i.e., pos...
October 07, 2019 at 22:35
This is....almost....correct, from a very specific and quite narrow moral point of view, but merely highlights the care one should take in formulating...
October 07, 2019 at 19:00
Hmmm.......I guess my predicaments weren’t sufficiently terrible? Sure seemed that way at the time. Just how terrible does a situation have to be to d...
October 06, 2019 at 20:40
Yes, but mean-ness could also be pathological, in which case explanations from psychology holds sway. Humans are seldom entirely arrogant, which is an...
October 03, 2019 at 21:22
Mean-ness can be thought as describing a subjective feeling under the umbrella of arrogance. Being mean is the manifestation of mean-ness, and takes i...
October 03, 2019 at 13:17
Oh, but it was certainly sound to all those considering it. It would have been impossible for them to think it wasn’t. In its time, it was the rule; i...
October 02, 2019 at 15:48
If all thought/belief is, is the correlation between perceptible things, then all I need to know language-less creatures possess thought/belief, is to...
October 02, 2019 at 15:17
Hey....you told me to imagine, I did, and the product of the imagining was sufficiently explained by instinct. There haven’t yet been any terms to ref...
October 02, 2019 at 14:47
Ok, but.....what things? So “what things” are things directly perceptible. Ok. Does that mean non-linguistic creatures can’t remember things?
October 01, 2019 at 21:05
Point: Counterpoint: Except when the statement was never true in the first place, re: in the case of the time-evolved knowledge that conditions the pr...
October 01, 2019 at 20:21
For the language-less creature, it is sufficient to say his correlations are given from instinct. Is it not an error of equivocation, to suggest that ...
October 01, 2019 at 19:10
I’m going with “understanding”. Just a guess. I’d rather be informed of what it consists of, to tell the truth.
September 30, 2019 at 15:51
As far as I’m concerned, a conversation doesn’t have to be eventually productive as it has to first be interesting. And what interests me about your a...
September 30, 2019 at 13:30
Oh. Well....good luck, then.
September 29, 2019 at 22:00
A proper report must change the truth conditions of that which is being reported upon, if the truth conditions being reported upon are known with cert...
September 29, 2019 at 16:46
Nahhhh, I don’t think I will. Natural condition modifies human, i.e., the general, empirically real, phenomenon; sub-system of intrinsic values modifi...
September 29, 2019 at 13:25
WHEW!!!! When someone who is historically concise, intelligible, insightful, makes what seems like a mistake, makes me wonder if I made the mistake in...
September 28, 2019 at 13:32
.....when thinking about thought/belief, yes. The proverbial voice in my head, the private monologue, the alleged “dreams of spirit seekers”; its name...
September 28, 2019 at 12:49
On pg 24, my initial question was...... ......and you answered..... ......then, sorry, no. Well......sorta. I understand you must define such a value ...
September 27, 2019 at 19:07
Sorry to interrupt, but..... Paranthesizing “what is beyond our experience and understanding” and placing it after “transcendental” doesn’t allow the ...
September 27, 2019 at 15:15
You are correct about the spatial ordering of the words of the statement. I asked you to be aware of a temporal order. I apologize for not making it u...
September 27, 2019 at 12:33