Mww

Ok. Thanks.

Good that Kant is your favorite philosopher. Thing is....the pure conceptions belong to understanding and are called categories, of which space is not...

Interesting statement. Transcendental.....what?

Ahhhh....the sheer joy of it!!! I’m about to indulge, so....here goes. Is this to say common sense is sufficient criterion for proof? ———- That one ag...

I’ll have to leave that alone; I don’t see how classical can be derived from nominal, but that’s ok. Also....once again.....translator’s preference. T...

Semantic content: having to do with meaning of linguistic or logic symbols. A.) neither phenomena nor noumena, as such, have to do with symbols of any...

D’accord. This notion holds even for rote instruction, such that those youngsters in their first years of schooling, by merely perceiving the objects ...

Regarding Aristotle, for those interested, and for context, see Metaphysics, 4, 1011b. I think much different, yes. “...This will be plain if we first...

Understood, and agreed, in principle. My language would be......errrr, shall I say, older?.....different, but the idea behind it would be congruent. M...

First: utmost respect; interesting and informative dialectic. Second: how, in the answer to “what is truth”, should that general dialectic by conditio...

By stipulating “philosophical research” sufficient to answer the questions, isn’t an academic answer implied? What problem? Sans debate, the problem d...

In seeking an answer to the question, “what is truth”, that passage says, in a modernized, which is to say, seriously overblown, manner, nothing effec...

Usually, conventionally, yes, but does not remain that case, in which an explanation serves as a proof? Granted, a highly restricted explanatory domai...

Ooooo....you sneaky devil, you. I see what you did right there. Everyone has his own presuppositions, and your chosen field of expertise aims to reduc...

We were warned, not to extend logic so far it needs bringing back: “....Because, however, the mere form of a cognition, accurately as it may accord wi...

.....just like that. Such knowledge is given immediately from that which constitutes experience, pursuant to a epistemological theory that proves what...

Well said. The subtleties can be finessed.....but generally, well said.

THAT’S what’s next.

I do so love being invited. It’s only later I sometimes regret it. “...The old question with which people sought to push logicians into a corner, so t...

Philosophically, it means that if sound reasoning supports the negation of a proposition under one set of conditions, and an affirmation of the very s...

While that may be necessary, it isn’t sufficient, insofar as no account is given for what the relationship is, or how it manifests, and consequently, ...

Ehhhh.....his philosophy is, in my view. And as a regular guy, I think he’s way too harsh on his peers, almost disrespectful. Combining the two subjec...

The relevant texts sustain the fact he doesn’t convolute one with the other; they are entirely different conceptions. It is those who followed that ar...

No. I’m questioning the OP, in which is stated, “Schop says that the narrow door to the truth is that our bodies appears to us as both external physic...

Perhaps someone can help me with S’s speaking of the noumenal world....or anything noumenal....cuz I can’t find it, at least in WWR, or FPSR. All that...

You’d think a philosopher would respond in a philosophical manner, right? At least one does, here: “....General logic contains no directions or precep...

Understood, and here is an assertorial judgement, insofar as “p is true” affords none other than an affirmation. I won’t agree “p” represents a judgem...

Simple feature...agreed. What would you say if “truth” and “false” weren’t so much attributed to judgements, but ARE themselves judgements?

HA!!! Sorry... I messed up. Posted a minor point I disagreed with, but that wasn’t what you asked for. I’ll have to think about it.

Agreed, in principle. Just depends on which act of the play......which step in the method..... is under consideration. Agreed, this time wholeheartedl...

I must agree. And....good series of comments.

....and at the very end of that “scholar” summarizing, is a get-out-of-jail-free card, or, as I already mentioned, suited himself for his own ends: “....

I have no use for OLP, but I have no choice but to use language, iff I wish to make a case. As I said....or maybe I deleted because I decided not to m...

What....you never heard the expression “thinking outside the box”? What is a culture if not a box? Being in a culture and conditioned by it, does not ...

Not much point, really. I am he who unabashedly “rises to the level of speculation”, you are not, by your own admission. Nahhhh. Here is the real Desc...

I’m far too old and been around far too many blocks to be offended by anything but the most egregious. But thanks for the sentiment. “.....it does not...

Alrighty then.....

Such is your prerogative. So what are they a product of, or, from where do they originate? How would it be problematic, if the individual writing of p...

The use of them is public, as a means to an end. The origin of them cannot be public, iff they are the product of an individual intelligence. That nam...

Yet, it was an “I” from which that notion of primordial is given. If the other way around, how come “we” is at the top of the second column of pronoun...

Not bad. Don’t agree with much of it, but then....I ain’t got no letters after my name, so what ta hell do I know. Some time later: it’s actually pret...

What’s superfluous? Experience? The remark? Doesn’t matter; I’m not interested in the superfluous. What norms; what is a norm and from whence do they ...

What.....you don’t? That can’t be right; you’ve already admitted to it, calling it “one and universal”. Yes it is, as are all such abstracted explanat...

That I make empirical mistakes relative to the eternal world says nothing about a private language nor about whatever normative reports....or even int...

I can be right or wrong about the world all by myself, thank you very much. So, no, I don't see it, sorry.

You stipulated Descartes’ cogito, so it follows from the original French (1637) Discourse on Method, Pt 4..... “... je pense, donc je suis....” .........

It makes perfect sense, for us, taken as a community of identical intelligences. It makes no sense for each of us, individually, with respect to ourse...

Short, sweet, to the point....the boon of good philosophizing. Scopes......(chuckles to self). Still, at the end of the day, I’m more convinced by my ...

What would the right kind of value look like?

Philosophy can only be done within the limits of reason, philosophizing is done within the limits of language. ———- “Its” being experience, the assert...