You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Mww

Comments

Depends on your philosophical preference. It is usually considered irrational to claim a truth that is technically merely a possibility. A.) To say an...
February 20, 2019 at 12:11
Who ARE you???? That was the most interesting read I’ve had in ages. You’ve taken the mind, the reality of which nobody knows anything about, and tran...
February 20, 2019 at 01:24
That something will happen is fine, one could say he knows something will happen, because it is impossible nothing will happen, barring extremes, whic...
February 19, 2019 at 23:42
Your latest post is exactly what I’ve been saying about your thought experiment since pg 5. You demand acceptance the rock will still exist, but here ...
February 19, 2019 at 21:13
You aren’t hearing me. You said of blue, the measurable properties x and y means it’s blue. That doesn’t make any sense at all to a guy who claims a t...
February 19, 2019 at 14:51
Yes, understood and agreed, in principle. Nonetheless, if we were herein engaged in common meanings, we would be writing newspaper articles instead of...
February 19, 2019 at 13:06
You have GOT to be the WORST epistemological realist EVER!!! There are some unconfirmed truths; but these are necessary truths, the contradictions of ...
February 18, 2019 at 23:40
Before science there were humans that perceived blue things. Before geometry there were humans that perceived equi-sided formations. Even if we can sa...
February 18, 2019 at 16:30
Yeah, the counterfeiter made the Kantian “better calculation”, and if never found out, there is reason to suspect he was quite thoroughly pleased with...
February 18, 2019 at 15:24
Ok. So if some properties are measured, some meaning follows necessarily from those measurements, but the meaning itself is not a measurement. If that...
February 18, 2019 at 12:27
I couldn’t help myself. First thing I thought was, time-like and space-like morality? Whaaaa??? Sorry. I’m all better now.
February 17, 2019 at 23:23
So would a realist say some EMR has the property of 450nm, along with the property of 630THz, and the property “blue”?
February 17, 2019 at 22:57
Just seeing how people think. No pressure, no biggie. What is color?
February 17, 2019 at 21:31
So you’re a realist. I’m sorry, does it hurt? They got remedies for that these days, ya know. (Grin) So what kind of realist are you? Scientific reali...
February 17, 2019 at 20:16
Nahhh... the easy stuff is done; morality is subjective, mentally located, if that is how one thinks of it. Philosophy, never one to leave well enough...
February 17, 2019 at 14:04
Absolutely. I can dig it. Still, as written, it is all hypothetical. What needs to be done now is turn that into a theory. Nobody’s gonna give a crap ...
February 17, 2019 at 13:49
The binary approach in question here, is the subjective/objective dichotomy, which is not required for *obtaining* individual morality. It is required...
February 17, 2019 at 13:32
They don’t. They can’t. That which does, is anthropological whatevers. No judgement whatsoever, whether puppies, tea cups, hot stoves, love and marria...
February 17, 2019 at 13:15
For the obtaining of morality it could well be one place and another, as long as they are of the same kind, which of course they must be. But that’s n...
February 17, 2019 at 13:08
You wrote this while I was writing. This I agree with: where and how morality obtains has no need of the binary approach, other than serve as the reas...
February 17, 2019 at 12:50
(“It” being the subjective/objective dichotomy) If that is true, how does the subjective/objective dichotomy fail, when subsequently described as cons...
February 17, 2019 at 12:31
Kant is notoriously hard to grasp, so right off the top, I shouldn’t present myself as an expert by any means. That being said, I haven’t found anythi...
February 17, 2019 at 11:35
We was all just wondering if you’d been......rehabilitated. ,,,,from missing the point that practicing morality presupposes its inception. We aren’t g...
February 16, 2019 at 23:59
What if the legislating authority and the obeying subject are the same? It would appear that obedience in such case could hardly be irrational.
February 16, 2019 at 23:43
Maybe one of the forms will be a true or false quiz..... ......even if “good” is undefinable, and even if “goodness” is not derivable from naturalisti...
February 16, 2019 at 23:29
Me ‘n’ the rest of the boys on the Group W bench acknowledge your superior logicianness
February 16, 2019 at 22:34
“.....In whatsoever mode, or by whatsoever means, our knowledge may relate to objects, it is at least quite clear that the only manner in which it imm...
February 16, 2019 at 20:27
I call your superior model and raise you a superior theory. I know, because I’ve tasted my thumb. In the interest of science, I assure you. Which does...
February 16, 2019 at 16:20
Certainly everyone has an equal claim, but that which satisfies the claim does not necessarily satisfy the being of equal. It would seem that the more...
February 16, 2019 at 16:05
Yeah, but if you are aware of Aristotle well enough to come up with eudaemonia, I shall assume you are just as aware there is something antecedent to ...
February 16, 2019 at 14:29
On logically minded Platonists understanding reason as being prescriptive...agreed. On people in general ordinarily understanding reason as being pres...
February 16, 2019 at 13:53
The was no specific reference to Kant in the OP, but now that the reference has been made with respect to Kant and the transcendent/transcendental dis...
February 16, 2019 at 12:46
Page 24 has calls for evidence, but not for whether this puppy crap is wrong or not. The call is for the morality grounding the judgement that this pu...
February 16, 2019 at 02:23
OK. You’re just saying there is a condition where there are possible objects yet unthought. If that’s right, then I can say, sure, there’s millions of...
February 16, 2019 at 00:20
That works....interpret the meaning of it. You said you could conceive an unconceivable object. I’ve been wondering ever since how I would do that. It...
February 15, 2019 at 22:47
Is there another way to say “I can conceive an unconceived object”? Kantian idealism isn’t the idealism of Berkeley or Descartes, but it is a necessar...
February 15, 2019 at 21:21
Guy across the street threw the snow from his driveway into the street because he didn’t want the road treatment chemicals on his lawn. He told the co...
February 15, 2019 at 20:48
Quite right. I should think a determination made on the basis of good with an expected return is an empirical good. (you scratch my back, I’ll scratch...
February 15, 2019 at 12:18
One of us has grossly misinterpreted the Critique.
February 15, 2019 at 11:54
Hey. Good to have your comment, thanks. That both Lady Jane and Tom want to avoid bad circumstances is the very root of the entire moral issue. There ...
February 14, 2019 at 15:01
Evidence of misunderstanding.......Yeah, I’ll go with that. What can I say. When I talk about my morality, I speak from knowledge. I KNOW the conditio...
February 14, 2019 at 12:49
(Chuckles to self) Ehhhhh......Mr. Potatohead. That’s just me being really confused. It’s your experiment, so the onus is on me to grasp the intent of...
February 14, 2019 at 10:46
Cool. If god is no less real the Johnson’s stone, then we’ll at least get to see what he looks like, the reality of a stone being common to everybody....
February 13, 2019 at 16:49
“The Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies” tacitly presupposes a third party observer outside the parameters of the thought experiment constructed from mo...
February 13, 2019 at 15:17
Agreed. I’m the above. The directly above anyway. Would you re-write the part about logically problematic and relate it to something specific in the a...
February 13, 2019 at 14:26
Remember....I’m a reductionist. Your parameters are all humans have disappeared. I am human so I’ve disappeared. If I’ve disappeared, even if I exist ...
February 13, 2019 at 12:56
The problem with the argument, taken from a myriad of manufactured moral dilemmas: If I am the one who claims, and I claim it is immoral for the Engin...
February 13, 2019 at 12:48
Leave off the adverb qualifying dependent. Thoughts and belief don’t “exist”; they are merely names given to participants in a strictly human mental p...
February 13, 2019 at 02:08
I’m not going to do that. I trust you are smart enough, and I know I am, to conform to established meanings in terminology so oft-used. That being sai...
February 13, 2019 at 01:39
You’re engaged in a philosophical dialectic. If you don’t understand the terms of common use within the context of that dialectic, you shouldn’t be he...
February 13, 2019 at 01:28