You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Isaac

Comments

Yes, exactly. Only the problem today is that the means by which that is done is being eradicated. Experts raising As Professor Stefan Baral put it in ...
October 22, 2021 at 05:41
Uh huh. I presume here you're giving a demonstration of the fact that... ..or alternatively you could actually quote me rather than more traducing. I ...
October 22, 2021 at 05:09
Yes, I agree. I think the development of beliefs is far more directly causal than that. I see hidden states of the system as causing the states intern...
October 22, 2021 at 05:03
Appropriate reaction, I think. It's a problem on both sides of the debate, and I don't think I'm just being nostalgic in saying it didn't used to be. ...
October 21, 2021 at 06:48
So are we all ideologically driven. Or is it just conclusions opposed to yours?
October 21, 2021 at 06:32
Yes, I think active inference is walking the same knife edge that quantum physics has to walk. On one side is a much better understanding of how the b...
October 21, 2021 at 06:31
This is not a Gallup poll. I don't think anyone on this site (and I suspect anyone within a twenty mile radius of you) is in any doubt as to what you ...
October 21, 2021 at 06:19
Yeah, I can see that, but claiming colour sensations are strongly emergent is still begging the question. It's the matter the thought experiment is me...
October 20, 2021 at 20:33
Weird thing happened to my reply. It's above.
October 20, 2021 at 20:24
. Why would that change the fact that we don't expect the contents to be there in the description.
October 20, 2021 at 20:10
Why not?
October 20, 2021 at 20:03
Right. OK. So what's wrong with the entirely physical description I gave?
October 20, 2021 at 19:46
Why? It doesn't seem to follow at all. Why would it be the case that if everything is physical we can describe it? What is it about being physical whi...
October 20, 2021 at 19:27
Yep. I agree with you on that one. How have you done the first part? How have you determined the presence of a conflict of interest or history of bias...
October 20, 2021 at 19:23
Yes. That one. But why would I do what you think is the right thing? Would you do what I think is the right thing? Weren't we just talking about stepp...
October 20, 2021 at 19:09
By citing one post. Keep counting.
October 20, 2021 at 19:07
Not wrong, no. It's about having reasons, not proving beyond doubt that those reasons are true. If a 'climate scientist' is being paid by the oil indu...
October 20, 2021 at 18:24
No, of course not. Because So still
October 20, 2021 at 17:44
Maybe, but how would anyone know (and trust) who those people were such as to ensure they paid sufficiently serious attention to them? I haven't read ...
October 20, 2021 at 17:37
That's literally all of us. No one here is an immunologist, yet we've just had massive long conversations about "vaccines and immunity and stuff", inc...
October 20, 2021 at 17:01
Learning about colours causes changes in the parietal-temporal-occipital region, the hippocampus, the frontal cortex... Seeing colours causes changes ...
October 20, 2021 at 16:37
No @"Yohan" is spot on. It's exactly the question the medical ethicists are asking.
October 20, 2021 at 16:30
Yep. Again, did you think anyone would disagree with such an obviously true statement? Or were you looking for brownie points? Here...4 gold stars for...
October 20, 2021 at 14:51
Yeah, but you're only saying that because... No, I'm not going to flog that any further. (Although, I'm only saying that because...)
October 20, 2021 at 14:41
Yes, the horror. Of course, though, with our newfound abilities to discern motives from a few internet posts, I can confidently say that you're only s...
October 20, 2021 at 14:00
No. As I've said dozens of times before. They don't meet the normal minimum standard of being experts in the appropriate field without discoverable co...
October 20, 2021 at 13:56
Nope. I'm saying that it's nonsensical to use the fact that people sometimes lie as an argument that this particular person in this particular instanc...
October 20, 2021 at 13:47
And you couldn't have seen that coming a mile off?
October 20, 2021 at 13:01
Yes, it seems so obvious now. Everyone who disagrees with me must be a lair, it's the only realistic option - after all, intelligent people couldn't p...
October 20, 2021 at 13:00
I suspect you know what you are doing. This is why I call it bad faith. Now what? It is pointless to call for something everyone already approves of.
October 20, 2021 at 12:16
I'm the one being accused of arguing in bad faith here. I deserve a little more than mud-slinging. Yes, which is exactly what this discussion is about...
October 20, 2021 at 11:32
Good argument. I'm undone. I'm not at high risk, so you'd agree there's no need for me to be vaccinated?
October 20, 2021 at 10:30
No. Nope. A combination of vaccinating those at highest risk, strict lockdowns, mask wearing, hygiene, investment in community health services, testin...
October 20, 2021 at 10:19
Ah, good, now we're getting somewhere. Let's have the proof then.
October 20, 2021 at 10:04
You know it does not apply to me either, or rather, you know that I do not usually behave this way.
October 20, 2021 at 09:57
Uh huh. So I think all those apply to you, you think all those apply to me. Now what?
October 20, 2021 at 09:42
Yeah, as you may know, the degree of inference in perception is a topic of interest to me and Hoffman is kind of the bogeyman of it. He's the place we...
October 20, 2021 at 07:07
Ha! Seems I missed... No, that's exactly what the discussion is about. the identification of those people. Identifying a category doesn't constitute p...
October 20, 2021 at 06:44
Yeah. Some of my wife's early work was with the development of children's writing recognition. A similar (I think) thing is found there. The recogniti...
October 20, 2021 at 06:12
Yep. I'm offering 4:1 on 'genocide', 8:1 on 'Armageddon' and 10:1 on the zombie apocalypse outsider. 2:1 favourite is that opposing views are actually...
October 19, 2021 at 19:27
No, you're right. I've checked quite a few, and the brains doing the believing, but I've not checked every single example. I kind of work on the princ...
October 19, 2021 at 17:36
Yeah. Proof and evidence being two different things here. That the sun rose yesterday is evidence that it will rise tomorrow under certain modelling a...
October 19, 2021 at 17:30
I'm not sure I'm actually following the link the OP is trying to make between Hoffman and 'logic'. Hoffman's theory is all about the veridical break b...
October 19, 2021 at 13:32
Yes, that's it. The prescience of some of Wittgenstein's ideas still surprises me. Not quite. As the authors say "we show that left-lateralized pariet...
October 19, 2021 at 12:38
Exactly. It is neurologically impossible to believe something without evidence.
October 19, 2021 at 07:25
Here I'm thinking of 'good' reasons as being those experience has taught us tend toward satisfactory results. Habits of thinking. If a person saying t...
October 19, 2021 at 07:24
I think that's self-evidently true to an extent, but then again people regularly make significant sacrifices for the sake of their children's comfort ...
October 19, 2021 at 07:14
Makes sense. It's difficult with hypothetical threats. Like with terrorism - more people are killed by fridges falling on them, but the existential th...
October 19, 2021 at 07:04
The debate is still going on I'm afraid. I've not kept up with this thread, but as I understand it, the debate is about automaticity of number recogni...
October 19, 2021 at 06:47
Why do you think they should cause any particular concern?
October 18, 2021 at 18:39