You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

Pussycat

Comments

Wittgenstein, the Man himself? :lol: Knowledge of mathematics and science have been somewhat shaken lately. It cannot be a complete interpretation tho...
June 08, 2019 at 21:12
Yes, if the "limits of my language are the limits of my world", then solipsism seems inescapable. Have you watched the series "Legion"? https://www.im...
June 08, 2019 at 08:08
If for God, solipsism and realism are one and the same, then I find it odd that Wittgenstein would say this in the Tractatus, in the part where God is...
May 28, 2019 at 19:39
yes of course, God is obviously inexpressible anyway, just because we talk about God, doesnt mean we express something meaningful. But do you think th...
May 19, 2019 at 06:58
Well, if God started doubting, then we would be fucked, wouldn't we? But I was thinking in terms of the Tractatus, where Wittgenstein says that in sol...
May 18, 2019 at 23:59
What do you mean by that, God is not a realist?
May 15, 2019 at 16:53
Wallowing was a poor choice of wording, as it generally does not convey what I was trying to say. I thought twice about putting it here, but at the en...
May 12, 2019 at 10:59
(I'm back, wow time flies, I didn't realise that 2 weeks have passed!) But what about the aforementioned act, what could that be, if it is not connect...
May 04, 2019 at 12:53
So if God's will is not concerned or connected with happenings in the world, and since whatever happens in the world is just something contingent and ...
April 16, 2019 at 13:37
So in other words, for Wittgenstein, without God, there is no meaning, there cannot be one, the world is meaningless without God. No God = no meaning,...
April 14, 2019 at 11:12
From all the above, I understand that Wittgenstein equates or rather links the meaning of life to God (the meaning of life/world, we can call God), an...
April 13, 2019 at 17:27
Amity! Why did you change Harrison's name to Wittgenstein??? Got me fooled there for a moment.. :smile:
April 13, 2019 at 12:30
Yes, I am sorry for wronging you, but you were right that sometimes it was a bit of both. Anyway, I don't think that in order to understand these thin...
April 13, 2019 at 12:26
Yes I did, I am no angel myself. Nevertheless, I gave you the benefit of the doubt, if you remember, whereas you did not. A lot has changed since, and...
April 12, 2019 at 13:09
How you say, it's the bollocks man! :yum:
April 11, 2019 at 17:21
Is this what I've been struggling to do? Because I was under the impression this whole time that we were working as a team, trying to figure out the t...
April 11, 2019 at 12:14
Well, it is such a common thing that discussions regarding ethics lead to the most violent of clashes, that would make anyone wonder what ethics is re...
April 09, 2019 at 21:30
You are so nice! :) You should have been a teacher or something similar, if you are not already, that is. But your approach to discourse resembles ver...
April 09, 2019 at 17:42
I don't think it is just my assumption. I mean, in our time and in Wittgenstein's time, there is a vast amount of ethical propositions before me and h...
April 09, 2019 at 16:02
Yes, this is the conclusion, but we start our investigation assuming there are. Yes I suppose you could say that. Why can you not say that ethical pro...
April 09, 2019 at 14:24
Yes, because there is something about them that bugs me. In factual propositions, facts can be represented - their content, but not the representation...
April 09, 2019 at 00:21
Can't do that, since the ethical is treated differently: ethical propositions are not like factual propositions where we can talk about the facts but ...
April 08, 2019 at 20:29
Yes, in the Tractatus it was put forward that all propositions have the same form, however this was abandoned later on. Anyway, what both houses and c...
April 08, 2019 at 20:09
Of course not, but rather if black and white are colours, then they must have something in common, they must share a connection, so they are essential...
April 08, 2019 at 16:31
Right, leave everything to me then! :) If it looks like a sermon, acts like one, then it is what it is. Copleston was dragged because I think he expre...
April 08, 2019 at 16:01
Well for one I very much doubt that all the above are things that one knows. I said previously what I think W. meant by the world of the happy man, an...
April 08, 2019 at 02:57
And what was this then? Something that someone just knows but cannot put into words? I am asking, because it looked like a sermon to me, and I wouldn'...
April 02, 2019 at 01:27
Right, so number 1 is that, whether for W. meaning and value are actually the same, whether they are essentially the same - same same but different li...
April 01, 2019 at 18:21
So you are saying that 'sense' in 4.022/4.031 and 'sense' in 6.41 mean different things? But yes, because I cannot see how the "sense of the world" wo...
March 27, 2019 at 12:05
hey hi Wallows! Woof!
March 26, 2019 at 08:30
Alright, can you bring an example that clearly shows this distinction? So if that is the case, combined with the fact that W. was not happy in his lif...
March 26, 2019 at 08:29
I'm back, hehe! So let us conclude this if you like. First of all, I think your reading of the Tractatus sees the transcedental ethics as providing th...
March 25, 2019 at 04:24
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TeZGqvbp8Ac
March 24, 2019 at 08:41
Did Nietzsche just call Spinoza a sickly recluse??
March 23, 2019 at 10:19
But the fact is certainly related to the act. So if he cannot see the immorality in the facts themselves, then how can he see it in the act? Is it onl...
February 26, 2019 at 12:52
Philosophy alienated me from friends and family! So it taught me something with regards to that.
February 25, 2019 at 09:36
But anyway Wittgenstein must have had a rather peculiar view of ethics and morality in general. It struck me as odd when I read his lecture where he e...
February 22, 2019 at 03:59
haha, well done Fooloso4, you have a sense of humour after all! The word "meaning" can have different meanings. We use it differently when we say "the...
February 21, 2019 at 11:04
No, I meant ethics as the transcendental: if it was employed as a means to see the world aright, then what is its use after this? I think he uses this...
February 20, 2019 at 02:45
So for the man that finally understands Wittgenstein, it wasn't ethics/the ethical that was transcended, but rather propositions about it: the ethical...
February 19, 2019 at 23:33
But when he writes that: "he who understands me finally recognizes them as senseless, when he has climbed out through them, on them, over them. (He mu...
February 19, 2019 at 20:25
He gives no meaning to "transcendental", so anyone can explain it how he sees fit. One can take Kant's meaning of transcendental, for which by the way...
February 19, 2019 at 02:00
Ethics still of course exists, in a sense, or rather not in a sense, it actually exists, for those that are still on the bottom of the ladder or climb...
February 18, 2019 at 23:08
Thank you Amity, I guess ... :blush:
February 18, 2019 at 15:26
Nope, wrong again. And well, no matter how many times a mistake is repeated, it still remains a mistake won't you all agree now? The only thing that a...
February 18, 2019 at 00:54
no shit Einstein! hahah down in the deathly hallows there's a man that wallows oh what a pity to be in a pit most shallow I say spit boy! and never sw...
February 17, 2019 at 22:30
You know, it's funny, Amity, that you only see my "lows" and personal false allegations but somehow manage to turn a blind eye to Fooloso4's lows and ...
February 17, 2019 at 10:16
Accuse is a bit harsh for a choice of words, but yes, I am saying that you don't understand him. "should seem to have" is not the same as "has", I won...
February 17, 2019 at 01:22
edit
February 17, 2019 at 01:18
Ah so experiential truths, like the truth of what vanilla ice cream tastes like (mundane), the truth of me having a toothache, the truth of feeling sa...
February 16, 2019 at 09:51