Maybe I should expand on that statement about ‘representation’. The most important term in phenomenology is ‘Intentionality’, which is the mode of ‘se...
We can already so this. Basically you just record the brainwaves and then apply that ‘thought’ to an action. It is more like programming a computer to...
Phenomenology isn’t about ‘representations’. The aim was to create a science of subjectivity - science of consciousness. Husserl’s concern was that ps...
There is nothing to change. You’re in a position of refuting goal posts exist. People have already offered examples of irrefutable knowledge - it is q...
I meant everything is phenomenon ‘of’ subjective consciousness. I was talking about phenomenology - where ‘existence’ of objects isn’t of direct conce...
Define perfect knowledge. The same argumentation goes against you too. If you don’t make explicit what ‘perfect knowledge’ is how is anyone to argue f...
I’m afraid whatever you’re talking about bears no relation to phenomenology then. Semantics and linguistics are no the direct concern of the phenomeno...
Words are intersubjective. Anyone can experience a box without sharing a common worded representation of box. It is the subjective of a box that matte...
This isn’t quite what phenomenology is about. It’s not merely a matter of words that gives an object. Subjectivity isn’t a give or take. Without subje...
That’s been done well enough others above. Circles etc.,. If you mean something more like ‘prefect organism’ you’d still have to establish the paramet...
I was expecting a definition of perfection? I can take a test and get a perfect score. Perfection is basically dependent upon the parameters it operat...
It’s worth listening to people who use more venom in their speech. Judaka can be direct and doesn’t veer from offending in order to make a point. We a...
The further point being that it can be easy to fall into a pit of blind speculation. Simply seeing what is and isn’t doubtful adjusts our perspective ...
It is irrelevant if this is or isn’t a dream. The experience is subjectively present. We do generally act in the natural mode of being rather than pon...
I didn’t say ‘no you can’t’. You said you can’t and I agree. The point is noticing the modes of intentionality: speculating, thinking, feeling, saying...
You can interpret it that way if you wish. I never said any of that specifically. Note: the ‘you’ is a universal ‘you’ - inclusive of myself. I wasn’t...
That’s a pretty poor stance to take as you can, even if you accepted box in the most obvious way (which I don’t need to point out), then you could the...
For the love of god and baby jesus and all who sail in him, use a term NOT already in use. It’s a headache reading around the definition of ‘subjectiv...
Subjective experience. What can you and can’t you imagine? What do you merely believe you can imagine rather than actually imagine? It is really easy ...
I don’t see jumping straight in at ‘do Chimps have justice’, and such questioning, as reasonably grounding for a progressive discussion. It is like ex...
To be clearer, there is no assuming in phenomenological approach and no empirical measurements. A ‘box’ is a ‘box’ because it has sides (in the physic...
Some neuroscientific research favours the phenomenological approach, some doesn’t. What you say above is mostly irrelevant to the subjective experienc...
The point of it is not to get drawn into what is ‘real’ or ‘existent’ - to ‘bracket out’ those questions as it doesn’t matter beyond experience in ter...
Husserl (aka ‘the father of Phenomenology’) Everything is phenomenon. I don’t even believe Kant meant there were two worlds? I guess you’re referring ...
Is anyone interested in talking about the phenomenological approach (Husserlian)? I just don’t really see where this discussion is going? There appear...
Hardly surprising given that NATO was mainly set up to protect against the ‘Red Menace’. Would Russians invade and reclaim land if the heavy military ...
We also see left and right, hot and cold and numerous other flavoured antonyms (gradable, relational or complimentary). I am assuming you don’t consid...
I don’t think we’re going to get too far exchanging thoughts here. I can, I hope, at least assist you in pointing out parts you’ve written that would ...
Spaciotemporal position. Also, we cannot hold the entire object at the same time - we cannot ‘view’ it from every angle at once. In this respect the o...
Don’t get me wrong. I get the gist of what you’re saying. The problem is knowing how you can determine what is Evil or Good. Is it possible for an Evi...
I wasn’t even nearly trying suggest that. Child mortality is not a great thing. I wasn’t thinking much beyond that and women being able to manage thei...
Some confusion here ... you misquoted someone else with my words. From my understanding of compatibilism one version says ‘free will’ in terms of the ...
I’m not going to pretend I’ve gone over the research in detail. Generally though lots of unseen bonuses appear in areas where young women are given be...
Comments