Wikipedia/atheism describes atheism to broadly mean lack of belief in deities. It's only when you get to the narrow definition where there is a positi...
You should perhaps: 1. Read Wikipedia/atheism, and you'll probably discover yourself to be wrong. 2. Actually read the rest of the OP, which addresses...
Science can reasonably indicate objective goal states or purposes. Whichever standards are predicted to approach said goal states, may perhaps be cons...
The thing is, purpose is not solely within the realm of religion; religion does not have monopoly on purpose. In fact, the only valid types of purpose...
You seem to be ignoring that teleonomy concerns quite quantifiable features, that can contribute to a framework for predictions, regarding species. Sc...
The OP concerns an objective/scientific process. Remember, Science tends to not care about the feelings of individuals, i.e. Science tends to aim to r...
1. Oh, but Science can contact matters of "purpose". It seems you completely ignored the "teleonomy" label, and that's expected, since it's not a wide...
You may not have known about teleonomy, but teleonomy, a scientific/atheistic concept, shows that religion does not have monopoly on purpose. They nee...
Have you heard of teleonomy? It is teleology evolved. Teleology was left behind after the scientific revolution. Wikipedia Teleonomy: "Teleonomy is th...
Comments