You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

RegularGuy

Comments

I am not interested in the abortion debate per se, but are there not facts in criminal cases and laws broken? It seems that that is analogous to moral...
January 25, 2019 at 17:36
Do you have any pets? If not, I might recommend getting a six week-old kitten. It would rely on you for all of its needs would grow to love you and yo...
January 25, 2019 at 03:32
Is that humility coming from a Randian? There may be hope for you yet! :)
January 24, 2019 at 18:53
hahaha! It’s been a long time since I heard that.
January 24, 2019 at 18:41
Magic mushrooms. Seriously. They’re doing research on it for depression (at Harvard I think) and it seems to work wonders.
January 24, 2019 at 18:25
I am an INFP personality. It sounds like you may be as well. The number one recommended occupation for someone with this personality profile is poet. ...
January 24, 2019 at 18:05
Exactly
January 24, 2019 at 17:45
You’re 20 and just discovered Ayn Rand, and I made the mistake of taking you seriously yesterday. lol
January 24, 2019 at 17:14
It sounds like you may have clinical depression. Have you thought about seeking help for that?
January 24, 2019 at 15:29
Well, I don’t have a problem with atheism qua atheism. I do have a problem with atheists telling me what the meaning of life is and that faith that Go...
January 23, 2019 at 22:29
That is a case of a Christian fundamentalist. Faith isn’t the problem. This is what Christian Scientists believe. Faith that God exists isn’t the prob...
January 23, 2019 at 22:21
I shouldn’t have been a dick to you. My delusions of reference at work. You may have a point.
January 23, 2019 at 22:10
If the purpose of life is simply to live, then it doesn’t follow that people can’t have faith in some things. How is faith in God, as in believing tha...
January 23, 2019 at 22:01
Your conclusion that life has an objective meaning doesn’t follow from the premise that we have reason. That God doesn’t exist doesn’t necessarily fol...
January 23, 2019 at 21:35
A sound argument has true premises and a conclusion that necessarily follows. You have miserably failed to argue anything.
January 23, 2019 at 21:32
erik2 has seen hard times. We have not. He has grown into an enlightened individual. We have not. Now if we could only get him to learn proper spellin...
January 23, 2019 at 21:30
Ayn Rand would hold the billionaires as virtuous, not some young buck who just read “Atlas Shrugged” for the first time and thought he was one of thei...
January 23, 2019 at 21:10
Well said
January 23, 2019 at 19:22
Just what we need: another asshole on the forum. Except this one worships Ayn Rand as well.
January 23, 2019 at 18:02
This sounds like a “only the strong will survive and prosper” or “only the strong achieve happiness” voice as opposed to a “the gentle will inherit th...
January 21, 2019 at 18:05
Just wondering what category you are because from your previous comments, you seem to have this voice as well.
January 21, 2019 at 18:00
A lot of people have an inner fascist, a voice in their heads. Some people absorb that value judgment as something to live by, some get beaten down by...
January 21, 2019 at 17:49
Anything by Kurt Vonnegut.
January 19, 2019 at 19:25
Shit on the floor! Lol
January 19, 2019 at 19:19
I’m confused. What is the contradiction? That something can exist outside the universe? Obviously you never saw “Rick and Morty”. Rick created a mini-...
January 19, 2019 at 19:15
Other universes could be outside our universe. Angels are just inter dimensional beings. God is a programmer(s) who created our simulated universe to ...
January 19, 2019 at 18:59
I believe I can clear up some confusion. S is saying that “God exists” or “God doesn’t exist” are metaphysical issues. You are making them epistemic i...
January 19, 2019 at 18:27
S and Terrapin Station are right. You haven’t made your case, and I’m afraid there is no rational argument based case to be made on matters of faith. ...
January 19, 2019 at 18:21
Maybe. I’m not sure. AJ Ayer only accounted for the necessary a priori (analytic truths) and the contingent a posteriori (synthetic truths). Kripke ad...
January 19, 2019 at 18:00
If the actual world determines everything, then all actual states of affairs would be necessary truths. But we can still speak of counterfactuals some...
January 18, 2019 at 04:40
All this. It’s difficult for me to parse.
January 18, 2019 at 04:25
Forgive me if I am misunderstanding you, but your language and grammar are difficult for me to follow. That’s probably my fault, not yours.
January 18, 2019 at 04:23
The possible worlds thing is just a modal logic language game. You shouldn’t take them as actually existing literal possible worlds. It’s meant to hel...
January 18, 2019 at 04:19
Like I said, the laws of nature are stipulated or assumed to hold in all possible worlds where Noah exists.
January 18, 2019 at 04:17
All what seems like hand-waiving?
January 18, 2019 at 04:15
Kripke holds that something is necessary if you can’t logically conceive of it being otherwise.
January 18, 2019 at 04:09
What do you mean by “accessibility”?
January 18, 2019 at 04:08
If by accessibility you mean that they are human life supporting, then they are possible worlds. If they are not, then the meter stick wouldn’t exist ...
January 18, 2019 at 04:02
Possible worlds are stipulated. We stipulate the counterfactuals. So, we would have to stipulate that the laws of nature are the same or different.
January 18, 2019 at 03:48
I fail to see how any of those things would improve my life (and I should include the caveat that it shouldn’t harm others as well). Believing things ...
January 18, 2019 at 03:27
I don’t believe it because I wish it. I believe it because I can’t imagine why matter should form into life and become conscious without God. And I do...
January 18, 2019 at 02:20
And what do you know about truth?
January 18, 2019 at 02:08
I don’t have to opt for the pleasure machine. I’m not a miserable lout. Lol
January 18, 2019 at 01:26
You refuse to try. You can always try. I’m not asking you to try, though. I couldn’t care less about assholes, God bless them! Lol
January 18, 2019 at 01:22
It depends what you mean by “reasonable”. I believe it is reasonable to believe something that improves your life. If being a skeptic improves your li...
January 18, 2019 at 01:16
I have yet to pin you down on any belief, as you refuse to give one. If or once you do, then I’m sure I can show it is a matter of faith. If the jury’...
January 18, 2019 at 00:55
Whoah! Whoa! I NEVER argued that there were sound God proofs or irrefutable religious arguments. I hold that religious belief is a matter of faith, bu...
January 18, 2019 at 00:41
What I am saying about String “Theory” and M “Theory” is that they are no better than me saying there is a universe where I am king of the world. My l...
January 18, 2019 at 00:17
Furthermore, internal consistency in mathematics may not refer to anything in reality. M theory may be mathematical fantasy.
January 18, 2019 at 00:08
No. They are unprovable, untestable hypotheses. There are no CONCEIVABLE experiments to test their validity. This was not the case with the Higgs Boso...
January 18, 2019 at 00:05