1. Actually an experience that is not expressed or formulated through thought or memory and translated into word or action is effectively formless. I ...
If an axiom is self aware, to some degree, does it need an independent observer to exist? If one axiom observes another what determines the relativist...
1. All definitions are defined according to the frameworks built around them. "Time" may have one meaning in a x philosophy with there being many phil...
1) There is not a strict definition to a line, or anything for that matter, except through the framework built around it. 2) A line can be both compos...
My apologies if I came off as rude or short earlier, and further apologies for a post which must become necessarily long. Keep in mind, you may want t...
Will address when have more time but in very simple terms, all axioms exist as limits which replicate to further limits, with this replication allow a...
Yes and No are relative to context of the definition, considering one may defined observation to means several different things relative to certain pr...
You have to be joking if you think that is a lot or even deep, or if you set the standard for sanity which is a debatable subject in itself. Thinking ...
An axiom, such as A or B is "self-evident truth" A self-evident truth: 1) Is both "subjective" (self) and "objective" (evidence as the cancelation of ...
The axioms of mathematics are still subject to the fallacies observed, thus negating them as a single stand alone quality with the exception of the pr...
A is an axiom. A as an axiom cannot exist on its own terms unless it exists through other axioms. A must project to further axioms, as A on its own te...
If A is defined through B(A,A) as C(A,A,A). 1. A is separated through B where A not just projects to a further defintion, but in this projection separ...
Mass is with out form. It is measured according to its resistance to acceleration (accelation occurs through direction as an object cannot accelerate ...
The definitions you argue are correct under standard axioms of mathematics. The problem, as axioms, is that they are subject to a multitude of fallaci...
I am fully aware it is a ratio, but this does not negate it from being a line as well. All lines exists as x length relative to the lines the are comp...
And what is matter but mass (formlessness), volume (form as formlessness being directed) and density (volume and mass interwoven)? The matter paradox,...
Definition occurs through the separation and connection of phenomena, by the phenomena directing away from its origins into a new phenomena (seperatio...
Space is the foundation for everything. From these terms we can equate all phenomenon, both abstractions and physical phenomenon, as spatial. The ques...
I will address at some other time considering some restraints, but Equivocation is not an issue of language, but measurement and definition that lends...
True, We are left with God as the third variable of this dualism, being/nonbeing, as existing as both and neither. God as both takes on a nature of sy...
If God is both being and none being, with God being the equivocation of being and non being, the by default God is defined as equivocation. We are lef...
1. The radius is the center point of the circle to its circumference. 2. Dividing the circumference by pi results in the diameter 3. It would be equiv...
The Nature of the Monad is reflected in Pythagoreanism most likely due to his travels rumored towards India, however the evidence for this is controve...
Actually, all arguments are variations of the same argument, they are determined by definition which is a progressively expanding circle. No argument ...
View it this way: 1 is a function through the line, hence 1 is a equivalent to a process of directed movement where the line and 1 are the same throug...
I understand long posts are not smiled upon, however your point is not entirely accurate. Point 8 specifically deals with the nature of the line and 0...
The application of a number, which in turn forms reality, observes the number shaping reality, hence having a degree of existence in the empirical res...
Yes and No. The point projecting to a point as point results in a 1d point. For example if projected in one direction it becomes a 1 directional line....
I agree with much of the above stated, with this nature of matter being of relatively significant value in the face of the materialistic society we li...
true words. In regards to the premise post in thread: One should seek both happiness and non happiness. Suffering is pointless on its own terms, so is...
Part of logic is attaching an inherent symbolism to concepts with the quantity and quality of the symbols determining the nature of not just the reaso...
While that "logic" may be wrong to the outside civilization, it will still exist as a framework which determines the movements of that community. Or t...
I apologize for the long post ahead of time, however in this case it may be a necessary "evil". We see "number" in the universe relative to the symbol...
If a number exists, due to empirical sense (where I see an orange and apply "1" or "2" as a quantity to it), what I am observing is the phenomena bein...
The quantification of all empirical phenomena, where the nature of number is dependent upon empirical sense, necessitates the number existing as direc...
The question I pose is "proof is?" (with it being posed in such a way considering "what" makes the question irrational by leaving out who,when,where,h...
It still requires a form of negation if perspective is the premise point of the argument. Perspective requires the negation of non-perspective. The ne...
That is actually a legitimate and fair question: Does an ignorant person know they are ignorant? Yes and No. My argument: 1) We all are aware that we ...
To accuse someone of a word salad is to project ones own ignorance. First, you have no argument of value as evidence in the last post. If you do not l...
Comments