The most satisfying response, in my opinion to the problem of petitionary prayer, is an attack on premise 1. Why do we characterize God as omnibenevol...
While I generally agree with the conclusion that this argument comes to, I strongly disagree with one of the more foundational premises. I think you w...
You still haven't shown why God must be omnibenevolent to be God. If God is not omnibenevolent I think I could still argue that God is worthy of prais...
Getting back to your main question, I don't think there could be. One reason being that many conceptions of God are contradictory. For example, if the...
I'm not convinced that your equation shows a contradiction in the idea of the GCB. I can think of a being that is omnipotent. I can conceive of a bein...
I don’t think I agree with your first premise; I don’t see why a monotheistic God must be omnibenevolent. That’d be great, of course, but I don’t see ...
I'm right there with you, except that this is not a debate between evidence and evidence, this is a debate between two (supposedly) equal ideas theism...
I think there’s a major problem with your interpretation of the argument. Another way to formulate the argument is: If God is omniscient, then God wou...
Pascal’s wager has nothing to do with popularity, if it did we could just say that since most of humanity has believed in some kind of deity all throu...
I’m not arguing for the existence of God, I’m arguing for the presumption of theism. Insofar as Pascal’s wager is used as an argument for God I agree ...
Comments