You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

DingoJones

Comments

Well, it is a sort of semantic game but I think it is the believer who makes it that way, by calling “disbelief” a belief. The goal is to create a fal...
December 11, 2018 at 22:47
Yes, but relevent and existing are not the same thing.
December 11, 2018 at 20:05
...irreconcilable and they coexist?
December 11, 2018 at 20:02
I would say that the information does still exist, it just exists in an encrypted state.
December 11, 2018 at 19:30
“There is no god” and “i lack belief in god” are not the same thing. If someone claims god exists, the person who lacks belief is still is waiting on ...
December 11, 2018 at 19:28
Why wouldnt they?
December 11, 2018 at 18:44
Only our perception of them needs a mind. They can exist without our minds.
December 11, 2018 at 18:42
Google “Russels Teapot”. That will put you on the right track.
December 11, 2018 at 18:39
This is like saying “t-shirts are not clothes though, they are t-shirts. You violate the law of identity if you say t-shirts are clothes” and in the c...
December 11, 2018 at 18:17
It is because generally speaking animals are not ethical creatures, they are not moral agents. You are basing morality off of suffering, rather than m...
December 11, 2018 at 15:42
Not really. The suffering of the humans if I ate their kid or sibling is real, and a moral consideration. Likewise with the pet. You just think that i...
December 11, 2018 at 14:49
It would be wrong because of the emotional attachments other humans (the only creatures human morality applies too) have to this severly mentally subn...
December 11, 2018 at 13:31
See that makes no sense to me. Old enough to consent to sex with all that might entail (babies mostly) but not drink alcohol?
December 11, 2018 at 01:49
That it was intended to create a distinction between the one proceeding cause and all the proceeding relevant causes. Lol, I suppose the answer should...
December 10, 2018 at 21:33
Am I just reading into your use of “immediately”?
December 10, 2018 at 20:38
That is what “temporal” means, the “immediate” implies a distinction between the one proceeding cause and all the relevent proceeding causes. That is ...
December 10, 2018 at 13:53
Ya, you are right. Some sort of standard age needs to be established, but at least we should be consistent on that age of adulthood. Old enough to vot...
December 10, 2018 at 13:42
I know too many 22+ year olds who make stupid decisions and vote for poor reasons or even cant handle alcohol. I know 14 year olds who could handle dr...
December 10, 2018 at 07:36
Lol, mic drop. Well said.
December 10, 2018 at 06:57
Lol, oh. I should have caught that. Still, “immediately temporal” implies the same thing.
December 10, 2018 at 06:45
It should be judged according to the individual, whether or not they can handle say, drinking alcohol. So who decides? Id say parents until they feel ...
December 10, 2018 at 06:21
You used a 17 year old in your example so I was answering based on that. I think other laws cover your concerns, a 9 year old drinking as much booze a...
December 10, 2018 at 00:49
Impressive, now go and google anti-theist and agnostic.
December 10, 2018 at 00:26
Their parents? Would we need a law for that?
December 09, 2018 at 22:35
Why temporarily? Are you looking to create some sort of distinction between causal chains/events?
December 09, 2018 at 22:29
I find it useful to always make a distinction between a belief in god and a belief in religion, its an efficient means of parsing what exactly a perso...
December 08, 2018 at 15:42
Not at all. Do you not undestand what parameters are? I admit that “preferential parameters” is a bit clumsy but im always happy to clarify if you ask...
December 08, 2018 at 15:36
How do you know that this isnt the best god could do? If god wants a universe with free will, or any other preferential parameters, why cant this be t...
December 08, 2018 at 04:52
Its not ambiguous in the least, its actually quite simple. Also, neither agnostic or anti-thiest cover what the word atheist means, they each are dist...
December 08, 2018 at 00:51
No, Ive never read the questionnaire, just the results and some data breakdown. I remember articles stating the study “concluded” that high atheism co...
December 08, 2018 at 00:35
Saying that Correlation doesn't mean causation doesn't end the story. As it says on Wikipedia/Correlation does not imply causation, one can extrapolat...
December 07, 2018 at 23:20
The UN Happiness Report and World Happiness Index indicate this trend, the least religious countries tendung to be the happiest. Correlation doesnt me...
December 07, 2018 at 21:06
Right, in the same sense other made up things are “outside” science, like astrology, magic, witchcraft, teapots in space, spaghetti monsters, etc etc....
December 07, 2018 at 07:23
No, the subject of the sentence is not a reference to itself. The rain isnt raining. Your question has been answered, the subject of that sentence is ...
December 05, 2018 at 02:26
If it is ethical to clone people at all, then it would be ethical to clone those people. What is it about these particular people or types of people t...
December 04, 2018 at 15:32
Um, all of it? I didnt deny that the brain develops until 25. What I said was, and amazingly you quoted me and still got it wrong, is that you do not ...
December 04, 2018 at 15:30
Yes, in theory.
December 03, 2018 at 22:26
Wait, time out. Where did I say or imply I saw no value in science?
December 03, 2018 at 18:43
Ok, so anecdotal. Fair enough.
December 03, 2018 at 18:34
I dont think a brain needs to be fully developed in order for a person to have good judgement. Under 25 isnt the same for everyone, so doesnt it make ...
December 03, 2018 at 16:37
Ok so the former. So what are you basing that on? Obviously niether of us is aware of all the cases but it seems to me that a person could justify sui...
December 03, 2018 at 16:33
Just to clarify, you are saying its never arrived at that way, or that its not possible to arrive to it that way?
December 03, 2018 at 16:15
You dont think that someone can arrive at the decision to kill themsevles rationally and/or logically? (In situations where they arent terminal or suf...
December 03, 2018 at 15:57
I like that sentiment. It seems draconic to test for voting like that but ignorance or stupidity causes real damage, is it wrong to defend ourselves b...
December 03, 2018 at 07:16
I dont have the time to respond to the points made to other people another time with you, nor to tediously respond to your cherry picked portions (aga...
December 03, 2018 at 02:38
Im saying that when they can have a basic understanding of the impact on their own lives. They may not have the same depth of understanding as they ma...
December 01, 2018 at 18:40
It is the latter, ethical standards cannot be applied to creatures/things which cannot comprehend ethics. There may be other, practical reasons to tre...
December 01, 2018 at 17:26
Im not sure they do, how mentally disabled are we talking about? If they cannot understand right and wrong...
December 01, 2018 at 15:50
I think the bolded portion conflates practices of humans with human moral sphere. Ergo, you cannot sneak animals in by starting with their involvement...
December 01, 2018 at 09:59
I would just call gods existence a fiction of the bible, or religion. That is the way god exists. That seems like more direct phrasing to me.
December 01, 2018 at 02:39