You are viewing the historical archive of The Philosophy Forum.
For current discussions, visit the live forum.
Go to live forum

DingoJones

Comments

This isnt a question of not worrying about what you cannot control. You are really not concerned about say a pedophile spying in your kids? Spying its...
November 05, 2025 at 05:00
Why would you not be fine with strangers tracking your children?! Are you serious? What an absolutely mad question to even ask! And you’re comfortable...
November 03, 2025 at 04:09
How does Vegan fit in? Vegan is…scientific?
October 29, 2025 at 05:18
You might as well, it doesnt look like your going to make any headway with Praxis.
October 10, 2025 at 04:17
I think your opposition would say the same about you. I guess Im less interested in whose right or wrong and more interested in the two sides actually...
October 09, 2025 at 18:01
You made a point earlier about Christians claiming to be Christians but aren’t actually Christians. Its just like that. Woke principals include equity...
October 08, 2025 at 22:10
That would be item #9 on the regressive agenda. 9. If someone brings up a problem, pivot to talking about a non-problem.
October 08, 2025 at 19:25
It can be. As I told Praxis you are using a broad brush here. Your points about problematic woke land with me (See my previous post about the regressi...
October 08, 2025 at 19:21
Well, I think woke has some good principals. Equity is good, racism and sexism are bad, traditional values need to be updated…those all seem good in p...
October 08, 2025 at 15:00
Back before woke became a popular it was called “regressive left” by some. Fitting I always thought, given the very obvious but very ignored double st...
October 07, 2025 at 22:53
Im not. Apparently mistaken, but not dishonest.
October 07, 2025 at 04:34
It was my summation of your view not a direct quote. I followed up by offering apologies if that wasnt your view.
October 07, 2025 at 00:13
Ive been following along.
October 06, 2025 at 23:43
Ok. Inaccurate..sure, a broad stroke rather than nuanced. Skewed by Maga rhetoric? A broad stroke. Its possible to express opinions that overlap with ...
October 06, 2025 at 23:24
That there is nothing to what Fire is saying but dishonest Maga talking points. If Im wrong about that view then apologies.
October 06, 2025 at 22:08
It was a commentary on your denial not your politics. I was being cheeky, this thread could use some levity. Maga anti left hate mongering is standard...
October 06, 2025 at 22:01
We know you are Praxis, but he’s trying very hard to get you not to be.
October 06, 2025 at 20:02
Thanks I think? I would say this is an example of woke over reach not necessarily woke itself. That was the point I was getting at by starting with a ...
October 04, 2025 at 23:18
A suggested definition of woke that should satisfy left/woke folk. Then if I may suggest the task then becomes discussing what parts of the spectrum t...
October 04, 2025 at 20:25
Pretty obvious to me Boethius is the disingenuine (and likely mentally ill imo) one here. How could a question so simple be impossible to answer? Inst...
September 15, 2025 at 21:14
That would be an analogy of the irony of a gun guy getting shot, sure.
September 11, 2025 at 17:36
It is the same in the “sacrifice” regard. The trade off of lives is analogous, not the reasons why or even what those lives are traded for. We are wil...
September 11, 2025 at 03:21
I see. Honestly Im not really buying your broader premise here. Im not even a fan of Kirks but Im not going to pretend him and gaza have anything pert...
September 11, 2025 at 03:05
Cars are not analogous to guns when it comes to necessity, I agree. Thankfully for my point I am not making an analogy about necessity. Im making an a...
September 11, 2025 at 02:59
Im honestly not sure what you mean here.
September 11, 2025 at 02:46
Nope, it may well turn out to be them or any number of other motives…but I doubt you’d wanna bet much money on it :wink: If it turns out to be a jilte...
September 11, 2025 at 02:40
No idea how Kirk would react to an angel. That is not the trade off I stated I was referencing your direct quote not your non-sequitur hypothetical sc...
September 11, 2025 at 02:38
Can we not appreciate the irony AND be disgusted by the reaction to a political assassination? One shot from a sniper position. Primary suspicion of m...
September 11, 2025 at 02:07
Not reasonable statement? Replace “guns” with “cars”. Still unreasonable? The irony isnt lost on me, but I think Kirk would 100% include his own death...
September 11, 2025 at 02:00
So you are arguing or asking if the assassination of Charlie Kirk was justified? Youre a mod? Thats pretty fucked up.
September 11, 2025 at 00:33
In: Faith  — view comment
I am not. Ive spent a lot of time talking to those folks and learning but I don’t seem to be built that way. Where I stand depends on what the claim i...
August 24, 2025 at 04:14
In: Faith  — view comment
The point of disagreement is “reasoned choice”. Obviously it depends on the specific belief or claims but in general I think a lack of belief can be r...
August 23, 2025 at 16:14
In: Faith  — view comment
As we should with all things reduced to “mystery” as a description. I disagree here. I would call it need rather than preference. Some people seem to ...
August 23, 2025 at 07:10
In: Faith  — view comment
Not beyond Cartesian doubt obviously, but It think we can be reasonably certain….but it sounds like you believe no one has any knowledge about god, fr...
August 22, 2025 at 20:06
In: Faith  — view comment
Unless the god in question could/would/should stop or curb that evil. The fact that there is no intervention, even just a quick “do not kill in my nam...
August 22, 2025 at 05:11
In: Faith  — view comment
In the sense that a god of certain traits (all good being my example) would not allow that/those traits to be represented by followers. Since the trai...
August 21, 2025 at 21:03
In: Faith  — view comment
Well there ARE bible literalists, so some people do believe a cartoonish thing. Of course it is also low hanging fruit as you say, the easiest attack ...
August 21, 2025 at 20:35
In: Faith  — view comment
Im curious what the cartoon account is in your view. Are you seeing any of that in Paulas posts or do you mean in general?
August 21, 2025 at 14:54
Well, its a good thing you’ve brought this to this forum. Once its in the hands of an obscure philosophy forum there is no end to the help such a high...
August 13, 2025 at 14:00
God, holy spirit, jesus. Water, ice, steam. Same substance, different form.
August 08, 2025 at 19:43
One is just as justified to say life is eternal joy as saying life is eternal suffering. I wouldnt say either is accurate though becuase obviously bot...
July 28, 2025 at 18:14
Fair enough.
July 09, 2025 at 14:28
I think we’ve seen enough failed predictions about Trump to see how the people you speak of react. Most of what they say now they said about his first...
July 09, 2025 at 01:44
Thank you
June 26, 2025 at 17:26
Odd, this thread isnt showing up in any of the forum catagories…
June 26, 2025 at 17:11
Test
June 26, 2025 at 17:10
It is enough to achieve your goals though, in fact its all you can do. It seems to me the hidden problem for you is the timetable. You cannot achieve ...
June 26, 2025 at 13:52
If you pay taxes you are addressing a lot of those. The answer to your question is to be more involved in the institutions which it seems like you do....
June 25, 2025 at 22:58
Some gems in there, thanks Bob.
January 11, 2025 at 21:55
You don’t need to know the future to rationally conclude something is a temporary problem. You can assess outcomes based on previous cases, scientific...
December 27, 2024 at 18:23