By the way, please feel free continue debating, but l've decided to quit the forum, forums are too addictive and l've got a hideous and unfair workloa...
By the way dude, please continue debating, but l've decided to quit the forum, forums are too addictive and l've got a very addictive personality, and...
OK first let me address an error l made. I said materialism = anything beyond 1. Yet the infinity of an infinite God = beyond 1. So l said, okay, mate...
I demonstrated why war is the only possibility, by asking you to lower your guard and live in harmony with me as a fellow deity. Then evilly smirking ...
An infinite quantity that is tangible to our senses e.g. infinite energy. Omnipresent would mean infinite latent energy which would mean omnipotent. E...
I don't know if you count the Islamic concept of God, but it is part of the system of Abrahamic religions. So, incorporating that, l would say: - The ...
Ethics = ground-level morality, a sort of secular morality. There are big differences that come to light in some situations e.g. when people say "sure...
Hi there, I have not gone off topic, l have tackled your query (re: can there be multiple omnipresent beings?) head on and resolved it through reason,...
Few people wold fit your definition of atheist, because it conveys a certainty that most would consider unwarrantable. I agree it seems unfair doesn't...
Hi again there bro' fro' ano' mo', it's cool that you disagree as you're accompanying it with reasoning. So anyway: You said: Changing the definition ...
Sorry, i've really tried to understand you, but l cannot due to either something being left out of your sentences and/or the sentence structure. Goodb...
Hi there, I believe my redefinitions are anything but vicious, l have explained their merits, i.e.: - They encourage profession of belief after reason...
I believe it's contradictory because in my scheme: Agnosticism = either way, l cannot decide, though l've tried to Atheism = I've considered the optio...
Hi this is a separate debate entirely. Also l'm not even sure what you are talking about. I believe you are telling me l cannot prove God exists. Howe...
It solves the following (as per the OP): - We have many different, often contradictory viewpoints in mind. These view points are often changing in the...
I am redefning the meanings, to bring clarity to a vast body of debate. You are replying that l am a deviant and l should get back with orthodoxy. We ...
Hi there, it is black and white and your analogy is false. Space contains things such as what we call space, plus dust, plus stars, planets, and so on...
Hi i'm sorry but your reply to my reply either contains no counter reason (e.g. where you say a finite universe is NOT crazy, it just isn't crazy, wit...
My redefinitions work better. They are more elegant, hence l proposed them and explained them in great detail. I need not learn anytihng, maybe you co...
"Ok, within that context what's the problem with objectively aknowledging the difference between one's beliefs and knowledge?" What? Let me explain ag...
When l say Atheists know that they cannot scientifically dismiss God, l mean in the context of falsifiability, they cannot dismiss God. The scientific...
Hi there, theism is theism, no? And atheism is atheism. So, an agnostic new atheist with nasal embolism is just a person that exists along a lot of di...
Lacking a belief either way, sans any dialogue, is apathy. It is beyond the discussion. For example, a tree is not agnostic, it would merely have apat...
Please keep it civil, and understand that the same could be said of your words. Also note that Appeal to Authority is a logical fallacy. I suspect you...
The omnipresent would be the omnipotent, e.g. because of the amount of latent energy present (infnite energy). Omnipresent + omnipotent = infinite act...
Hi there, l refute the two arguments in the OP: * Can't reach infinity, so actual infinity is impossible Answer: impossible for you to attain to yes, ...
Comments